Sociopath Community

So many topics here.

Japanese women being railed by white people..

Colonialism...

Birth rates..

How people dress...

I guess I'll keep my answers short:

Japanese women being railed by westerners: Amen, this is as it should be. The only problem is when Japanese women realise that sex with westerners doesn't equal marriage and a house, after crashing their dating market value. Tragic. They are fucked both figuratively and literally by western bastards.

Colonialism: Japan was kind of butt fucked after WW2 and forced to westernize.

Birth rates: We could assign women to mandatory breeding service if they don't get married until the age of 25. It's an extra incentive to get married with someone you like, and for the geeks it'll be nice because they don't need to jerk off to hentai anymore.

How people dress: The left wing view is that conforming to stylistic rules, eg, wearing a suit, makes you a supporter of a class society. They essentially want to deny the primal instinct to judge people. The problem is that it's a primal instinct. The right wing on the other hand encourages and celebrates that primal instinct. You could say that the left is delusional and the right is ape-like.

Jada said: 

So many topics here.

Japanese women being railed by white people..

Colonialism...

Birth rates..

How people dress...

I guess I'll keep my answers short:

Japanese women being railed by westerners: Amen, this is as it should be. The only problem is when Japanese women realise that sex with westerners doesn't equal marriage and a house, after crashing their dating market value. Tragic. They are fucked both figuratively and literally by western bastards.

Colonialism: Japan was kind of butt fucked after WW2 and forced to westernize.

Birth rates: We could assign women to mandatory breeding service if they don't get married until the age of 25. It's an extra incentive to get married with someone you like, and for the geeks it'll be nice because they don't need to jerk off to hentai anymore.

How people dress: The left wing view is that conforming to stylistic rules, eg, wearing a suit, makes you a supporter of a class society. They essentially want to deny the primal instinct to judge people. The problem is that it's a primal instinct. The right wing on the other hand encourages and celebrates that primal instinct. You could say that the left is delusional and the right is ape-like.

 I think both you and the right are delusional and ape like. I also think essentially, you are the same and it only becomes more obvious with your "ape-like" call for arranged marriages. The true geeks are not going to be fall for your little charade.

You're kind of predictable. Even if youre younger than me, it would be nice if one of you people entertained me by saying something witty for once. It's so dull.

Am I really so much more intelligent that there's nothing you could say that would surprise me? Surely you're not trying seriously. Can you try to be intelligent for 1 or 2 posts so I can see if it makes a difference, or if you're genuinely this unimpressive.

Does none of you ever try to be better than you are now? Are you all just content?

You might be intelligent, but it's wasted on liberal theory bullshit. It actually makes me sad. I think you just can't seek the truth where it would deny your practice of seeming intelligent because of how much liberal philosphy makes it easy to philosphically and intellectually wax.

Where would it be better utilised?

Liberal bullshit is one of my hundred hobbies. I'll move on eventually.

I'm also talking about fundamental/classical liberal theories you tend to entertain (free speech, trickle down economics etx.). In my view you hop from conservative to socially progressive talking points as a way to seem emgaging instead of wanting for a straightforward and tangible viewpoint.

Because if you just want to intellectually wax, then why not just disprove trickle down economics instead of enable a socially accepted yet wrong theory in a site already vocally conservative/liberal or enabling of them?

You have the exact same neo colonial positions they do when you do assert an opinion.

"Seem" is the wrong word. I'm sharing questions I consider interesting, because I like to solve problems. There's no particular reason I'm sharing both views except to demonstrate that at least I understand both viewpoints. And if I don't, maybe there's room to grow.

I'm not trying to portray any image. This is like that time I was accused of using fancy words to "seem intelligent" as opposed to using precise language to describe what I wanted to say. I'm quite literally speaking what's on my mind.

I would say I'm bored with how easy Physics is to me, so as a past time hobby I analyse things that I can understand from a mathematical viewpoint. I see free market in terms of game theory, as an analog to markov chain monte Carlo, with Bayesian players, and in terms of instability theory. It's interesting from that viewpoint because it offers tangible benefits and I can see how the free market as a foundation is close to an optimal solution to the problem of economic growth.

I don't however condone the byproducts of the free market, even if I see the benefits of free markets. What I find interesting is that if you view the free market as a global optimization process and the individuals and structures that emerge as individual players that optimize locally, the socialist solution to economy is not scalable economically, by virtue of requiring structure to maintain it. So while I agree with, say, most socialist values and end goals, I find the problem of how to build a system similar to the free markets in a socialist setting very challenging.

I guess my hobby now is trying to figure out if there is a local economical instability that could be induced in a socialist economy, similar to the instability we see in the free market economy. Then the arguments in favor of free markets would no longer have any foothold. So far I see no similar instability but instead a highly inefficient system that will kill itself with bureaucracy.

To address what you said though:

Why do you say that the free market theory I laid out there in the other post is wrong? As a foundation, it seems rather solid. The problem is that it needs patchwork. But the foundation is on pretty solid ground.

There's also significant evidence of the economical benefits of a free economy. I could cite them if you wanted. If you want to test a theory, take a look at the evidence. The free market experiment has been run already. Look at the enormous success and wealth.

I do want to "dismantle" the foundation of the free market economy. But it's not possible to "disprove" it. You can't disprove that Earth is round. It fucking works. There's no question about it.

This is why the right thinks the left is delusional. Facts cannot be disproven just because they inconvenience you.

It's hard to even discuss this, because the term "free market" is a loaded term with obvious bias right out of the gate. Also it's not consistent how you switch the phrase free market for free economy all of a sudden. Words matter.

I have an idea of what you are talking about, but it's still bunk, and it's proven that socialism has a lot of positive impacts on the economy. And high gdp does not even equal the benefit going to workers or citizens. This is why you've recently had to justify "trickle down economics" to yourself lately, to rationalize what you're saying right now with the authoritarian capitalist talking points... because capitalist libertarianism is a falsehood in every way, no matter if you claim the exact label of libertarian.

Summary, your "facts" are colonialist bullshit.

The strong has discipline and heart. Courage. Real courage, not shameful behavior for some cause. 

The strong gives peace a chance as the woke agenda isn't the agenda of the strong. It's been tollerated while the majority doesn't favor radical ideology, the woke agenda's position will be demoted and reserved for the subhuman to enjoy as their own culture, while the majority doesn't celebrate sodomy.

As it's always been the strong survives. This is also true mentally as the weak kill themselves from lack of resilience.

In the culture war, the blessed will have the last laugh, while the radical opposition drowns in their own wickedness. And yes, it's very laughable.

Good bye Justin. While your Canadian Liberal party manages to get you to resign and take power without an election, we'll be having an election anytime between April and October, and like many many many other nations these day, Canada too will return to Conservativtism, and we'll once again prosper as a politically wiser civilization. 

Mmmhmmm.