Proof of misogyny!
Horrified but not surprised to have spotted misogyny, she noted that men publicly abused and trolled online women who were also in the movement. Lois Shearing then spoke to a woman who was formerly in the far right, but now aligns her views with Lois Shearing, this previously wrong women said she had experienced harassment and sexual violence during her time in extremist circles. Which proves how the far right men are all misogynistic. Lois Shearing says some female far-right members believe women must be subservient and submissive to men and that their biology predisposes them to be so, but that the women allow for this because it means they can have power as white people.
Lois Shearing is alarmed and warns that there has been a rise in women being “the faces of far-right movements”. They are exploited by fellow members to “add this veneer of respectability” and make their extremism appear more approachable. “The far right can say ‘we don’t hate women – we have women’”
Women are in it for the money
Another argument heard from this aisle is that they are in it for the money. Although both sides offer similar revenue. To say that women with a different viewpoint only have that viewpoint because they’ve been bought is not only extremely ignorant but they miss the mark by far of the reasons as to why the opposing side has a different view than them. It is a desperate attempt to smear the other side instead of hearing what they are saying. Feminism used to fight for women, women have been dismissed for their views for centuries with various excuses of them not being intelligent enough, them being too emotional, hysterical, easily influenced, and now feminism adds that they do it because they’ve been bought, or because of their skin color etc. Feminism has turned on the very cause they fought. I guess not even feminism could stand against the patriarchy and join the machine.
“And there is the money” Lois Sheaning writes, “female far-right influencers are profiting from hatred” – adding that ‘“they have carved out a niche for themselves to make money by posting offensive content on platforms that reward engagement”. She goes so far as to say “they are just grifters”. She concludes that “the way that social media is set up, wherein stuff that is rage bait tends to go more viral or get shared and promoted more, means that they are rewarded for spreading this kind of bigotry and hatred.”
She further thinks that “these women, if they could make the same amount of money doing fitness influencing or makeup blogging, they would have, but those are very saturated markets and it’s harder to make money”.
To conclude the feminist take on far right women: Women don’t have their own opinions, they are only radicalised, in it for the money and exploited for it.
I think this is highly problematic coming from a movement claiming to lift up women, but only does so with those that submit themselves to their cause and align their opinions with them. When trying to understand women with opposing views they rely on harmful slander of women that they claim to fight.
Reference:
The article "Pink pilled"
Hey Missy, I read all of this, did you?
It doesn't make a point, and it says nothing. Are you trolling by sharing this without reading or actually sub 90 iq? I am sorry I am asking this as respectfully as I can, because the author simply describes some irrelevant instances, failing to explain anything, and spouting words for the sake of spouting words.
This entire debacle can be summarised as. There is a far right movement and some women take part in it. There was a woman that stopped taking part of it. Maybe it was because she felt empowered by being white despite this far right movement discriminating against her and looking down on her in a way? Some other women are preaching it because its financially beneficial to them.
It fails completely at explaining what this is. You can replace far right with "group A" and it maintains all meaning.
Like jesus fucking christ this is some dumb shit, and a waste of time. What the fuck are you on about?
As a psychological portrait, you are simply virtue signaling the kind of group you want to be a part of. Brainwashed bimbo. I spit on you. Don't try to pretend you're educated ever again.