It didn't just seem like it was pro-pedo. It was pro-pedo. Because it had pro-pedo threats.
And I did know people were not pro-pedo, but they were pro the pro-pedo threats.That is not hypocritical, because if you ban him for doing the same, it is an expected outcome. And when you do it, it should be expected as well.
Anyone that DMs invites to another server gets banned, on any server, this is the standard.
He is not exempt from this rule.
You just have different rules, where no one gets banned for it. You fail to see it from the other person perspective.Like it was and like I had said, the easiest way to overcome that was simply to ban him instead of debating whether you should or shouldn't. I wasnt for a popularity contest but tc made it one so you could have gone that route instead of just dramatically shutting it down. And it wasn't pro-pedo, it was literally one retard, and people stopped participating because of that retard. So it seemed pro-pedo but wasnt but keep twisting it to fit that justification.
If the forum tolerates it, it is pro-pedo. Because... there is pro-pedo content on it??
No one tolerated it...what exactly did you want the forum to do? The only ones with mod tools were you, inq and Turncoat so is it fair to say that you were pro-pedophilia?
Only blanc said something about it.
No...plenty of others had said things about it.
No they had not.
Yes, they did.
The website's been rehosted now, why not link or quote it?