Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 11 posts
0 votes

Tate (my analysis)


Posts: 1331

his rise to fame was amazing actually if you look at it. he is also pretty smart and witty. his curse eventually was that ANDREW TATE became bigger than himself and rather than acknowledging that he tried subconsciously to fill the shoes of his own imago resulting in a false self. 

Posts: 32915
0 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)

Actually, the real mastermind behind him is Iggy Semmelweis. Much like Roger Stone with Trump as a pairing after seeing television success, Tate became the figurehead for Iggy's work after Big Brother. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 21
1 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)

his rise to fame was amazing actually if you look at it. he is also pretty smart and witty. his curse eventually was that ANDREW TATE became bigger than himself and rather than acknowledging that he tried subconsciously to fill the shoes of his own imago resulting in a false self. 

 It’s sad I got excited thinking this was going to be a good thread, but it was not a very thorough analysis. Aren’t you like a therapist or something?

You know what you just wrote was a conclusion and not an analysis, right?

To analyze someone, is to go through their actions and potentially their stated feelings and draw conclusions about why they may have acted or felt those ways, based on what you know from whatever source, such as counseling or behavior types or whatever, and its correlation or lack there of, to the person’s activities and possible stated feelings.

I saw only a single conclusion and no discussion of the what or the why of any activities, that taken together, would suggest the conclusion you provided. Is that what you do for your patients? I’d ask for my money back if I were them.

Lame bro 😎 

Posts: 1331
0 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)

his rise to fame was amazing actually if you look at it. he is also pretty smart and witty. his curse eventually was that ANDREW TATE became bigger than himself and rather than acknowledging that he tried subconsciously to fill the shoes of his own imago resulting in a false self. 

 It’s sad I got excited thinking this was going to be a good thread, but it was not a very thorough analysis. Aren’t you like a therapist or something?

You know what you just wrote was a conclusion and not an analysis, right?

To analyze someone, is to go through their actions and potentially their stated feelings and draw conclusions about why they may have acted or felt those ways, based on what you know from whatever source, such as counseling or behavior types or whatever, and its correlation or lack there of, to the person’s activities and possible stated feelings.

I saw only a single conclusion and no discussion of the what or the why of any activities, that taken together, would suggest the conclusion you provided. Is that what you do for your patients? I’d ask for my money back if I were them.

Lame bro 😎 

 Hello,

Did you forget how I battered you into submission in the past? Do you need it again?

Posts: 101
0 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)

his rise to fame was amazing actually if you look at it. he is also pretty smart and witty. his curse eventually was that ANDREW TATE became bigger than himself and rather than acknowledging that he tried subconsciously to fill the shoes of his own imago resulting in a false self. 

 It’s sad I got excited thinking this was going to be a good thread, but it was not a very thorough analysis. Aren’t you like a therapist or something?

You know what you just wrote was a conclusion and not an analysis, right?

To analyze someone, is to go through their actions and potentially their stated feelings and draw conclusions about why they may have acted or felt those ways, based on what you know from whatever source, such as counseling or behavior types or whatever, and its correlation or lack there of, to the person’s activities and possible stated feelings.

I saw only a single conclusion and no discussion of the what or the why of any activities, that taken together, would suggest the conclusion you provided. Is that what you do for your patients? I’d ask for my money back if I were them.

Lame bro 😎 

 Hello,

Did you forget how I battered you into submission in the past? Do you need it again?

 Revisionist history with wishful thinking.

Posts: 101
0 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)

his rise to fame was amazing actually if you look at it. he is also pretty smart and witty. his curse eventually was that ANDREW TATE became bigger than himself and rather than acknowledging that he tried subconsciously to fill the shoes of his own imago resulting in a false self. 

 It’s sad I got excited thinking this was going to be a good thread, but it was not a very thorough analysis. Aren’t you like a therapist or something?

You know what you just wrote was a conclusion and not an analysis, right?

To analyze someone, is to go through their actions and potentially their stated feelings and draw conclusions about why they may have acted or felt those ways, based on what you know from whatever source, such as counseling or behavior types or whatever, and its correlation or lack there of, to the person’s activities and possible stated feelings.

I saw only a single conclusion and no discussion of the what or the why of any activities, that taken together, would suggest the conclusion you provided. Is that what you do for your patients? I’d ask for my money back if I were them.

Lame bro 😎 

 Hello,

Did you forget how I battered you into submission in the past? Do you need it again?

 I only submit to people who earn it and I have yet to submit to anyone but God. 

Posts: 32915
0 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)
Just said: 

 It’s sad I got excited thinking this was going to be a good thread, but it was not a very thorough analysis. Aren’t you like a therapist or something?

You know what you just wrote was a conclusion and not an analysis, right?

To analyze someone, is to go through their actions and potentially their stated feelings and draw conclusions about why they may have acted or felt those ways, based on what you know from whatever source, such as counseling or behavior types or whatever, and its correlation or lack there of, to the person’s activities and possible stated feelings.

I saw only a single conclusion and no discussion of the what or the why of any activities, that taken together, would suggest the conclusion you provided. Is that what you do for your patients? I’d ask for my money back if I were them.

Lame bro 😎 

 Hello,

Did you forget how I battered you into submission in the past? Do you need it again?

 I only submit to people who earn it and I have yet to submit to anyone but God. 

Aren't women in your backwards religion supposed to submit to men? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 161
0 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)

The guy trains daily and is jacked up. 

Kickboxing champion in multiple classes. 

Owns and operates multiple businesses, last I looked they were making 13 million a month, not including any of their other ventures, just their online course. ( "They" as in the Tate Brothers and not some fake pronoun ) So he's indeed rich as hell. I mean really, they amassed an impressive amount of wealth. 

Is very sharp. A Chess Master. 

Talks to men about becoming the best they can be. ( Nothing wrong with this )

Has respect for his teachers mentors and elders.

Woke people dislike him and find him offensive.

These guys certainly made their dreams come true. 

His curse is the WEF. They have an agenda to depopulate the world so they do so by pushing the woke narrative that men can be women, teach children to be queer from young, pit men against women which destroys dating, they encourage women to take on men roles and be like men, and that having traditional families is uncool, even though the nuclear family is were good mental health comes from and of course make men out to be toxic.

The woke narrative, or straight up, homosexuality, and radical left leaning policy is the reason why Rome fell. It's a narrative that weakens a nation and depopulates our species. Tate basically tells men to get sexy and rich, have children, be healthy, lead, which goes against the woke narrative. A nation filled with weak men is also easier to manipulate and control. 

When asked, I'd reckon Andrew Tate is who he claims to be. I'd also suggest to any man who's about to meet those guys. Don't bring your girl around them as they showcase everything a woman desires in a man to such a high degree while being superstars, plus women are hypergamous. She'll blush whenever they're mentioned.  

Posts: 32915
0 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)
It's really a matter of repeating these things like mantras, huh? 

I guess that's pretty typical for religions and cults. 

Owns and operates multiple businesses, last I looked they were making 13 million a month, not including any of their other ventures, just their online course. ( "They" as in the Tate Brothers and not some fake pronoun ) So he's indeed rich as hell. I mean really, they amassed an impressive amount of wealth. 

His networth has decreased to $12 million according to the Celebrity Networth Database. 

Dude's losing steam, he's become old news after the sex trafficking shtick. Other than you I don't really see people bringing him up that often anymore, his relevance has been shot. He's basically just taken as a meme of a Right Wing Hobbyist now with opinions everyone's now already heard before. He's become increasingly and redundantly old hat as a relic of a former timeframe, and I'm thankful for his continuing loss of relevance. 

His curse is the WEF. They have an agenda to depopulate the world so they do so by pushing the woke narrative that men can be women, teach children to be queer from young, pit men against women which destroys dating, they encourage women to take on men roles and be like men, and that having traditional families is uncool, even though the nuclear family is were good mental health comes from and of course make men out to be toxic.

The woke narrative, or straight up, homosexuality, and radical left leaning policy is the reason why Rome fell. It's a narrative that weakens a nation and depopulates our species. Tate basically tells men to get sexy and rich, have children, be healthy, lead, which goes against the woke narrative. A nation filled with weak men is also easier to manipulate and control. 

When asked, I'd reckon Andrew Tate is who he claims to be. I'd also suggest to any man who's about to meet those guys. Don't bring your girl around them as they showcase everything a woman desires in a man to such a high degree while being superstars, plus women are hypergamous. She'll blush whenever they're mentioned.  

Rome didn't have the internet nor factory levels of automation to keep up with demand, so it's not really the same ballpark anymore. 

Otherwise this angle you have going here is pretty gross, your idea of good mental health for women is for them to regressionally resume the position of learned helplessness over your own ineptitudes when it comes to social adaptation being further empowered by a group of like-minded failures. Once again the dude's just a glorified pimp with a cult leader pulling strings behind his charisma. He treats them like assets instead of people and he even drops a lot of the same tropes openly. He's just mogging an overcompensating Red Pill brand SMV with some Pyramid Schemes doused in a coat of modern paint, and without Iggy he'd have been a complete nobody in today's political climate. 

Compare the guy to how Ahnold Schwarzenegger did in his prime (and is doing now), Tate's the dying breath of The Male Power Fantasy looking to make a smooth buck on some simps and rubes rather than it's savior, and dudes are acting like they just learned Santa's fake. If this dude were propped up back when The Man Show was a staple of television and Action Heroes were one of the most popular genres, no one would give a shit about Tate's Hustle over how he's little more than a Salesman. 





Men (white ones especially) are going nuts, but the symptoms coming out of it resemble an entire gender learning they are just as helpless as the ladies they once prided themselves as being above. They're acting so disillusioned over the death of Male Innocence's Power Fantasy, while the rest of us are like: 

Posted Image

Conflating the dude's sins in lust and greed with anything holy is also insulting towards your own faith. If anything his approach is largely Earthly and Satanic, all about wealth, ego aesthetics, and pussy instead of the hereafter. I mean come on, his business model was named "Hustler's University", he advertises how he's scamming people as a way to laugh in the faces of his own cash crop while straight insulting them. It takes a special brand of gullible and beaten down to buy into something like that. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 6/10/2024 1:31:56 PM
Posts: 161
1 votes RE: Tate (my analysis)
It's really a matter of repeating these things like mantras, huh? 

I guess that's pretty typical for religions and cults. 

Owns and operates multiple businesses, last I looked they were making 13 million a month, not including any of their other ventures, just their online course. ( "They" as in the Tate Brothers and not some fake pronoun ) So he's indeed rich as hell. I mean really, they amassed an impressive amount of wealth. 

His networth has decreased to $12 million according to the Celebrity Networth Database. 

Dude's losing steam, he's become old news after the sex trafficking shtick. Other than you I don't really see people bringing him up that often anymore, his relevance has been shot. He's basically just taken as a meme of a Right Wing Hobbyist now with opinions everyone's now already heard before. He's become increasingly and redundantly old hat as a relic of a former timeframe, and I'm thankful for his continuing loss of relevance. 

- You don't seem to understand, Networth is based on visible assets, not money. 

- That link you posted doesn't count his greatest source of income, which is his real world. Which averages 250,000 students paying 50 bucks a month. Do the math. 

The bigger paragraph you wrote there doesn't matter. He's successful on a corporate level more than a single person could've ever hoped for. Who cares if he runs out of steam, anyone would be blessed in his shoes. 

 

His curse is the WEF. They have an agenda to depopulate the world so they do so by pushing the woke narrative that men can be women, teach children to be queer from young, pit men against women which destroys dating, they encourage women to take on men roles and be like men, and that having traditional families is uncool, even though the nuclear family is were good mental health comes from and of course make men out to be toxic.

The woke narrative, or straight up, homosexuality, and radical left leaning policy is the reason why Rome fell. It's a narrative that weakens a nation and depopulates our species. Tate basically tells men to get sexy and rich, have children, be healthy, lead, which goes against the woke narrative. A nation filled with weak men is also easier to manipulate and control. 

When asked, I'd reckon Andrew Tate is who he claims to be. I'd also suggest to any man who's about to meet those guys. Don't bring your girl around them as they showcase everything a woman desires in a man to such a high degree while being superstars, plus women are hypergamous. She'll blush whenever they're mentioned.  

Rome didn't have the internet nor factory levels of automation to keep up with demand, so it's not really the same ballpark anymore.

Rome got tackled by barbarians. 

 



Otherwise this angle you have going here is pretty gross, your idea of good mental health for women is for them to regressionally resume the position of learned helplessness over your own ineptitudes when it comes to social adaptation being further empowered by a group of like-minded failures.

That's your opinion. I'd argue I never made any statements about women's mental health, but rather a strong family foundation being the root of a person's good mental health. 

While I'm at it. Marriage is for the sake of raising a solid family. Though I personally don't believe in it in this day and age. It's been destroyed which is why Islam is going to populate and take over the west eventually. 

 

Once again the dude's just a glorified pimp with a cult leader pulling strings behind his charisma. He treats them like assets instead of people and he even drops a lot of the same tropes openly. He's just mogging an overcompensating Red Pill brand SMV with some Pyramid Schemes doused in a coat of modern paint, and without Iggy he'd have been a complete nobody in today's political climate. 

I don't think you have any evidence of your claim about Iggy.

From what I gather, Tate has a band of men with various talents, Iggy is a part of that.  I think you've came up with a conclusion about Iggy. 

 

 



Compare the guy to how Ahnold Schwarzenegger did in his prime (and is doing now), Tate's the dying breath of The Male Power Fantasy looking to make a smooth buck on some simps and rubes rather than it's savior, and dudes are acting like they just learned Santa's fake. If this dude were propped up back when The Man Show was a staple of television and Action Heroes were one of the most popular genres, no one would give a shit about Tate's Hustle over how he's little more than a Salesman. 

Tate teaches young men not to simp. That's a bad thing. Though some women think it's a good thing, it really isn't. 

Tate's course offers things like marketing. Copywriting Nate, how to copywrite. Cryptocurrency and stocks, Dropshipping, Ai, money and time management. Most young guys don't look into those things, and not all will succeed. For 50 bucks I say it's worth it, though I personally never joined, I learned my craft on my own, though I did join some trading groups along the way and learned quite a lot. 

Coffeezilla did a think on Tate once. He made 3 grand and ended up complaining how the HU never made him rich. If you ask me, if you pay 50 dollars and learned something to make 3k, that's a really good start and it beats hanging out on a forum doesn't it. 

 


Men (white ones especially) are going nuts, but the symptoms coming out of it resemble an entire gender learning they are just as helpless as the ladies they once prided themselves as being above. They're acting so disillusioned over the death of Male Innocence's Power Fantasy, while the rest of us are like: 

I'd argue you're a white man who went nuts. lol Male innocence. Man.

 

 

Conflating the dude's sins in lust and greed with anything holy is also insulting towards your own faith. If anything his approach is largely Earthly and Satanic, all about wealth, ego aesthetics, and pussy instead of the hereafter.

No one is conflating his sins. What's being conflated is his message, what he's doing, what he's selling. Also I don't really believe in faith but since you're talking Christianity, none of that would be an insult to it because Christianity suggests we're all sinners.

 

God gave a man 1 job. That's to spread his seed, and it's why a man in 2024 has to up his game, especially in the land of inflation. 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/u0Fhhn69KfM

10 / 11 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.