Sociopath Community

Xadem said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Xadem said: 

Tony can u stop lumping TC and me in with the cp posters 

You call it that, but you were the straw that broke the camel's back Xadem. 

 No I was not, it was a group effort. Besides, even if I were it would only mean that I was the final element in a long series of elements.

Absolutely. And you were.

And you haven't addressed what I said, I would like the clear distinction to be made that TC and I are not cp posters. M'kay. 

 I never said I had to mop up your shit.

But as far as TC, Cawk and Jim are concerned, I had to, as I clearly stated.

https://antisocial.boards.zone/ 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Just because I never accepted an opinion this time, doesn't mean I never do.

What's your process? 

 I'm not sure I understand the question.

Plain and simple. I know the truth and I stand by it.

But how do you know the truth, what do you do to verify or test it's validity? 

lol TC.

I know it's the truth simply because I seen it for myself.

You can't have made it this far with just judgement statements in place of problem solving skills. 

All you're selling me with your inability to answer a structural question in place of a data one is that you can't do it. 

When shown a spade, we all say it's a spade. 

I know you also know better, because you have the capacity to record data and use it at a later date in your grand schemes.

Stop toying with me.

I'm asking about how you think and process things instead of what you think and process. The how is significantly more important. 

Did I have to clean up after you ? Yes.

Did I have to clean up after Cuc ? Yes.

Did I have to clean up after Jim ? Yes.

This is memory. "Memory" <<<< Your answer.

Do you remember when I said you have to be at a certain level to debate me cause I like to move forward ?

Well it's very backward for me to have to explain "how I process things" over something painfully obvious.

Spatial Mind said:

This is memory. "Memory" <<<< Your answer.

Do you remember when I said you have to be at a certain level to debate me cause I like to move forward ?

Yeah, a low one who doesn't know the praxis. 

Well it's very backward for me to have to explain "how I process things" over something painfully obvious.

I was asking in general. 

You've gone way off topic here.

Asking me how thinking works lol.

Science is still trying to figure out how the brain works TC.

Spatial, I can't figure out 80% of your word salad.

Spatial Mind said: 

You've gone way off topic here.

Asking me how thinking works lol.

I asked that a while back though, I want to see how you find "truth" so that I can attempt to relate to you. 

So far I've picked up that you think the world works one way, your way, and that others who don't see it are actively practicing denial. 

Science is still trying to figure out how the brain works TC.

But you can still narrate your process as you understand it. 

Also lol at your talking about me with Sug' in Discord. 

It's not that it works my way.

Like If it worked my way, then we would not have CP.

I adopt nothing but the truth, and how do I know ?

It's difficult to explain to you, because you TC, live a life of smoke and mirrors. I'm talking about your mental condition.

I do believe my eyes when I see things happen. You struggle with that.

Explaining to you how I see the truth, is like explaining what colour looks like to the blind. << You force me to say things along the lines of something everyone heard before.

.

.

.

Why not explain to me how do you know to delete CP, Nate ? 

I think it's "ignorance" which is synonymous with stupidity, as you're not going to conjure up or rationalize anything better than the truth itself. And you do it for the sake of argument.

The only reason I keep going, is because I've not quite given up and saving you from yourself.

Spatial Mind said: 

It's not that it works my way.

Like If it worked my way, then we would not have CP.

I adopt nothing but the truth, and how do I know ?

It's difficult to explain to you, because you TC, live a life of smoke and mirrors. I'm talking about your mental condition.

The entire field of psych and many facets of Eastern philosophies express that everyone's in their own mirror maze with paths shrouded in a fog of their own making. To say your view is itself "truth" without a basis beyond "because I saw it" is youthful ignorance of your own lack of validity in relation to the universe at large and a lack of bothering to dig into the components that comprise the pillars of existence. 

Seeing should not solely be believing. I mean what, do you believe magicians are actually magic or something when you don't have an explanation for their tricks? No, you understand that it's a trick by the very nature of it, and in the same fashion people's thought heuristics can be handled humbly in the same way, both directed towards others and the self. 

If we see that the majority of people are "wrong" in a vast and varied number of ways, what makes us any more right relatively? What entitles you to taking yourself more seriously than you take others? What puts you above the mistakes and shortcuts of your fellow man? 

I do believe my eyes when I see things happen. You struggle with that.

Explaining to you how I see the truth, is like explaining what colour looks like to the blind. << You force me to say things along the lines of something everyone heard before. 

As I've said many times, common sense is an illusiory strawman that lends to a human template norm that no one specifically conforms to. It alludes to a different sum of values between each and every person, and largely serves as a statement that projects their lives onto the believed lives of the majority, a perceived notion of an ingroup unconsciously believed to be modeled off of yourself instead of the other way around. In short, "common sense" is only "common" for the illusion of the shared beliefs more so than the actual matching of them. 

I'd also probably make the earnest effort to try to describe color through synesthetic language. Even if I don't succeed it sounds like a good discussion that'd lend experience to not only what makes senses hard to communicate, but also his rationalizations of my attempts would grant me more data in relation to how the blind might think. 

Why not explain to me how do you know to delete CP, Nate ? 

What in like, historical context terms or how my thought process went? 

I think it's "ignorance" which is synonymous with stupidity, as you're not going to conjure up or rationalize anything better than the truth itself. And you do it for the sake of argument.

Do you figure those who do not share your truth are ignorant, or knowledgeable in things you don't take seriously? 

How could you ever hope to be diplomatic if you cannot even visit another's perspective? 

The only reason I keep going, is because I've not quite given up and saving you from yourself.

Yeah that notion tends to keep me on the line as well with a lot of people, but that's some mentor ego shit that for myself I've been trying to drop. While much might be in their benefit from doing so, it's an expression of the need for control. 

It's cool, you can try to save me and stuff, whatever keeps the chatter flowing. Something about me makes holy people think I need saving.