Sociopath Community

HA HA HA

I'm starting to feel bad for you. What a terrible condition to have. 

Spatial Mind said: 

I'm starting to feel bad for you. What a terrible condition to have. 

Always the ad hominems when your thoughts are short circuited... Every. Time. 

Once you've made it personal about their character it's clear that you've lost. You already don't care about logical fallacies and circular reasoning, but once it hits the gossip button it's clear that you're just letting your Lilith steer you. 

Not even. You really do have difficulty with truth. To you the truth is unique to each individual, which is the way of delusion.

Spatial Mind said: 

Not even. You really do have difficulty with truth. To you the truth is unique to each individual, which is the way of delusion.

Here's the thing about "The Truth"; There is no "The" that we can perceive, simply "truth" as we can understand it. 

If it was truly about my being disordered, than our fellow man would be a bunch of philosophical clones of you. As is it's you aiming to separate me from the common man when the common man doesn't even agree with you. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Not even. You really do have difficulty with truth. To you the truth is unique to each individual, which is the way of delusion.

Here's the thing about "The Truth"; There is no "The" that we can perceive, simply "truth" as we can understand it. 

If it was truly about my being disordered, than our fellow man would be a bunch of philosophical clones of you. As is it's you aiming to separate me from the common man when the common man doesn't even agree with you. 

 The answer is the same for everyone on a calculator.

What holds true are formulas and numbers. We've built rocket ships from scratch and sent them up, and it's only made possible based on what is true. "The Truth" is a very real thing, in all things.

There are greater numbers in life, and even what we discussed has it's mathematics to it. It can be broken down to what was written.

- People don't want CP on the forum ..... True

- Jim posted CP, though not so much as of late.... True

- Cuc posts CP, more than his bisexualhomojimsexual  these days..... True

- Cuc posted CP, just last Friday .......... True

- "TC thinks" the Truth is a personal outlook for each individual..... True, but if everyone thought this way, we wouldn't be where we are today. Everyone would be off in different directions accepting and rejecting whatever they deem to be significant.

You're able to read, because each word was presented to you as correct within it's making, and everyone who can read accepted it the same way. 

Now you ask. How do I know this is true, or how or why do I believe my eyes. You might be thinking life is but a simulation. A hologram in some matrix. If that were the case, I can only work within the way this simulation works, and within it's boundaries, there is true, and false.

It is not "A Truth" it is "The Truth" because "a truth" implies many truths and interpretations will get messed up. We wouldn't be able to work together, and what is true promotes what is functional.

Spatial Mind said:

The answer is the same for everyone on a calculator.

What holds true are formulas and numbers. We've built rocket ships from scratch and sent them up, and it's only made possible based on what is true. "The Truth" is a very real thing, in all things.

There are greater numbers in life, and even what we discussed has it's mathematics to it. It can be broken down to what was written.

Math exists as a baseline of measurement from drawing an arbitrary point in space in relation to another end point. Math goes through many, many stages to prove itself so that it can deserve to be taken in as a "factual" form of shorthand. It's meant to demonstrate a consistency that can be replicated across many things. 

Math isn't "inherent", we made it so that we could try to bridge knowledge to one another with more clarity of depth, much like how the Inuit have around fifty names for snow and we Americans have over ten different names for different types of sandwiches.

It does not denote truth, it denotes a perceived believable argument towards depth and consistency. Math makes an argument, while your logic is simply believed from the merits of it being your own. 

It is not "A Truth" it is "The Truth" because "a truth" implies many truths and interpretations will get messed up. We wouldn't be able to work together, and what is true promotes what is functional.

- "TC thinks" the Truth is a personal outlook for each individual..... True, but if everyone thought this way, we wouldn't be where we are today. Everyone would be off in different directions accepting and rejecting whatever they deem to be significant.

...you mean like what's already going on? 

You're also not lending to the notions of peer modeling, weak wills, and a desire for leadership. Not everyone with beliefs of their own go on a pilgrimage in relation to them, many just hold their beliefs somewhat shallowly in private as a smaller aspect of their lives. A lot of why people are taking more deviant directions lately is coming from a reduced sense of physical peer modeling being proxied with online interactions towards cherry picked people of a like mind, offering them the means of feeling less challenged by the outside world... until they're walking around in it without a phone in their face. 

We would still be where we are today within this model from our own individual needs having some room for Darwinian averaging and the interactions between different minds leading to greater outcomes than that of one mind copied hundreds of times. 

If we were to visit Astrology as a believable construct for dividing people into a number of possibilities, 12^3 for the main three and 12^5 if you throw in Nodes and Liliths, accounting for 1728 rough personality types and 248,832 more fleshed out ones (even more if you include cusps) if you ignore how silly or redundant that planets are in this system. As such, there'd be roughly that many different sets of life expectations when you dip into the specific to extremely specific, but if you only needed to appease one's inner ideals, outer expressionism, or their sense of self, you'd only need around 12 or so models to accommodate for everyone. 

The idea of us all having different means of seeing the world instead of a single common sense blanket statement isn't that crazy. It's not delusion or ignorance for one to see things differently from you, it's just statistical odds, and that is why it's worth analyzing one's process to see what nuggets of truth lay within their otherwise differing perspectives. 

Now you ask. How do I know this is true, or how or why do I believe my eyes. You might be thinking life is but a simulation. A hologram in some matrix. If that were the case, I can only work within the way this simulation works, and within it's boundaries, there is true, and false.

All I know is that what I see is a byproduct of my mind's perception of what's actually there, just like everyone else, and that person-to-person shows strong levels of variation when it comes to perceiving what is and isn't reality. 

Also, to say there is only "True and False" is like saying that computers are only comprised of "1s and 0s", a point that is flawed simply from ignoring what happens when you put multiples of those together and see what images or implications arise from the combination of once limited black and white variables. You find where the Gray is once you factor in multiple variables, while black and white is inevitable if you cannot mull more than your own immediate feelings. 

maybe if you had some life experience TC some of this philosophy you talk about would be worth reading but you have no career, no experience, no future...  noone will pay you for your expertise or knowledge, or time or wisdom. you are the educational equivalent of a stay at home mom.... just playing around on the internet desperate for any sense of identity... do you sleep well at night telling yourself your the savior of sc and your pedo friends?

Your insults would carry more sting if you had the capacity to understand these conversations. Without directly relevant context they just kinda seem random. 

There is a truth, you just lack the balls to take the risk of announcing it. You can never be perfectly sure of a truth. But you can accept the truth and preach it, as the truth, because you believe in it. And practically, the truth is not so hard to find. Only in some extreme theoretical situations, it is practically different.

Without accepting the truth, you can never move swiftly, confidently and decisively.
You will always be confused, conflicted and running in circles.

You should be open-minded up to a point.