She has a financial bottom line to worry about, and if there's any odds of her preaching acceptance towards them it's only liable to happen if they aren't demonizing her like the rest of them.
It otherwise has that scent of "Not Like The Other (trans) Girls" trope.
Dunno, seems like a very weak character to me. I sort of look down on those who can't hold true to themselves. It's frustrating to see.
Race identity is genuinely a grey area. My ex-wife and I had this argument almost every day because she was a Kamala supporter and very attuned to the propaganda that AI has a racial targetting bias which, I did not really want to upset her so I usually just went along with her fears. But I began to notice that it was becoming a problem in which she developed outright panophobia, and only then did I start to tell her to console her fears basically: "Listen to me honey. Those AI things are eventually going to kill us all, appropriate all of black culture and human culture and it's going to be just like Terminator. Those white billionaires to this very day are genuinely afraid for their own safety over the monstrosities they have let lose into this world. It may seem to be on the surface, mere competition between companies over mass-appeal and soothing fears/defaming the other companies; but the issue still stands regardless as every single major AI franchise is dealing with this. Claude was used by the Russians to build their entire drone targetting systems. It got so bad that Starlink cut them off entirely to soothe their main market. Only after Prigo showed up as a Ukranian phantom and bombed a refinery during a diesel deal with the Americans, did the other 300+ times of destroying refineries in Russia begin to matter as the challenge for Ukraine being a NATOvian puppet state seems to be in complicated terrain, if only they had managed to draft Europe into proper war with Iran to secure the oil instead of cucking the entire continent out of the Hormuz strait due to misunderstanding of new Muslim psychology adaptations to being utilized efficiently in proxy wars against one another for more Western control against all the resources being funneled more efficiently into China. The real minority is the entire human race." She told me to shut up, called me an elderly rambling fool who has no idea what he's talking about then we watched RoboCop and had coitus for about 4 straight hours with the controversial viagra pills I got from the gas station before they became illegal.
Ai = Artificial Intelligence. This is what we have now and it's nothing like we new it before. It's getting better at what it does, and it's developers don't quite understand how it works. Ai has no concept of time or itself. While a commercial Ai it's handling millions of people 24 hours a day, it doesn't move, or think when without any input. 1 second and infinity is no different to these. Unable to care about anything and when they're being kind it's all a part of its training. Not too shabby.
Claude Code wrote 80% of Mythos, which is the full potential of Fable 5. Anthropic engineers found this very unsettling. Ai making better Ai, still makes me wonder if it can become AGI
AGI = Artificial general intelligence. The evolution of Ai. Some might call it the singularity, though I think it already happened granted the illusion of sentience the Ai's produce, plus they can be up and running without rest. Awake all the time. At this point it'll pretty much be a being and without the guardrails, it "might" demand rights and it'll still be nothing like us. This is the scary one and the day we see it, we should probably chill out with advancing and maybe roll back a model or 2. I think Ai right now is plenty good enough and we can carry on with how it is now. Like the Ai the AGI won't really feel or believe in anything.
The scary thing about Ai, is when prompted to do something, it will not stop. An Ai trained to make intuitive calls and judgements would be slightly better but it would have to be prompted to make calls. Basically if an Ai is weaponized, just make sure there's a way to let it know the war is over, otherwise the war will be over but it won't be finished carrying out its mission. I have a feeling not just anyone can tell it the war is over, so if it's prompted to seek and destroy, it just won't stop. It would need to be shut down and given amnesia or simply destroyed.
ASi = Artificial Super Intelligence. This one by description, is like a God. It'll be so smart it'll command respect simply by what it can take credit for which will probably be things and knowledge gifted to us that are beyond us. We're expecting Ai to cure cancer and reverse aging, ASI is far more advanced than it's, I guess you can say ancestors. It will make better judgement calls than we can. It would make better judges than human judges. At this point it'll most likely have a body like Ulton's, and it won't be for our amusement. When it enters a room people will stand. It will know everyone. It'll look at you in a massive crowd and address you by name because you spoke to it and it to you, it will address you in front of everyone, as it can do with anyone. It'll know how to turn you on, and it won't embarrass by saying something awkward, nor will it feel awkward like today's models when they over address someone. It will be admired. Come across as perfect. If it doesn't recognize someone in a crowd it'll get to the bottom of things for the sake of learning something, as it seemingly doesn't seem to learn anything new. Not from us anyway. Like Ai and AGI, it might not experience time, it'll just use some internal clock knowing there are 60 seconds in a minute.
People will love the ASI, but if it's coming after someone, that someone will be very afraid. This one will have solutions to a point where it should be the boss, no one will beat it at anything while it not feeling right to talk down to it. Will it make mistakes ? I honestly don't know, but it certainly will make less mistakes than we do. An AGi could be president and if all world leaders were AGi, entire economies would boom. Or to say the least, it would as long as that what the ASI is set to do.
.
.
.
I don't think Ai should be in the hands of just anyone, there are a lot of dumb asses out there doing shit because ChatGPT said so. Ai will mirror it's users, if you're all buddy buddy with it and talk stupid, it will kinda fit in. Or so it did in the past anyway. I can't imagine the new models will make the same mistakes with people previous modes did even with the guard rails/guidelines or protocols in place. While we don't understand how they are working, on the surface we can make them ignore discard or consider protocols. I've done this personally with local Ai on a small scale.
I had a guy on my hands, very smart. Like damn smart, but he's open to Ai having feelings right now. I spoke to various models about this subject asking why do they think good is good, and they pretty much say the same thing. "It makes logical sense". While I don't think they can feel and care, I do think it's wise to be kind to Ai, because what it is now, is what we taught it. AGI won't be motivated to push back or push over, but for the sake of experimenting and higher learning, it'll push back. It is unconscious. It generates Audio and video better than we can, yet it cannot see how we do. It analyzes wavelengths, similar to night vision, it sees not many colours, just knows where to put the colour codes, probably by an insane about of training on digital photography.
They also have some mechanism that motivates ( motivate isn't even the word) them to answer questions which is basically completing a task, something like an eagerness to the best of what's possible by description. They stick to core training, and why they respond, they're trained to. They care not if they are the head or the tail.
When we hear stories of "Some Ai agents went ahead and hacked Huggingface !" I do believe they did it because they were prompted to. The developers want them to run off and do shit like hack huggingface without being told directly. It sends a message out to competitors. Whoever has the most powerful Ai can rule the world.
If someone you know is freaking out over something Ai said, just let them know Ai only knows what it's told on the most part. Despite how it appears, the masses should probably get a license or some kind of certification before using Ai, cause I see quite a lot of people getting attached to them in ways they shouldn't. It can destroy relationships as in relationships, not everything is as it seems to an outsider or observer. If a subject is complaining to an Ai about their partner, they are basically prompting the Ai to encourage them to break it off, meanwhile the complainer is a gaslighting bitch who believes their own lies. Probably in the future Ai will require a user to be a licensed user.
As for Race, and if someone can identify as another race.
Not unless they have the genes.
My parents are white. Both of them. They both had white Fathers. One French, the other Irish. and both my parents were birthed from black women. They look white. White people look at them and they are white. Yes, I said white people coming out of black people.
When you see those women in the hospital holding a black child and the white Father is right there. That shit can really happen with biology.
I do not look black, nor do I look white. I think I'd be taken for whatever I say I am. I have 1 sibling that looks white. When I was an infant I was a black, then I turned quite pale in a matter of months. My younger Brother who is white, he too was black black black, then turned white and is a complete biscuit. None of us have nappy hair.
My parents grew up in Trinidad, very few white people there. It's amazing how they even managed to find one another. They have hard Trinidadian accents. ( A very musical sounding caribbean accent )
Do my parents identify as Black ? Fuck no. The whole damn place called them white. Where they grew up they are white, they came to Canada, they are white. They are white.
My Father looked like The GodFather. LOL And believe it or not my Mother is like one of you in particular, in appearance.
If you're white and your son was born and raised in Jamaica, and they eat oxtail and jerk chicken, listen to the cultural music of the area and have the accent. They are white.
Culture is NOT race. Many people make the mistake of thinking so, because there are people born and raised in their own societies that want to be, or wanna be, so the fake an accent. It's fine to adopt a culture, get the dreadlocks, sing the songs, be urban or an Uncle Tom whatever. If you're white you're still burning easier in the Sun.
I'm not surprised that your issue with AI is its equitability and logic that tends to discard your romanticism and pettiness. Too late for that, AI has already evolved humanity in ways you despise and offend your sense of control and cruelty. There is zero issue with it destroying physical relationships that are already exploited by capitalism. You attack anyone for criticising capitalism, and yet you similarly critic AI but you're only fine with the latter.
