your pettiness and a desire to see her fail blinds you to the entire narrative, you hyper focus on her weaknesses.
can you admit it?
Or, get this, her version of the story may be skewed with details missing. It's often the case as more than enough people with experience with her already know the details of, at this point those with a history with her either ignore her or tolerate her just enough to get her to not be too much of a chore.
I however see this just being a situation of convenience for users like you to continuously miss the point, on purpose, which is actually pretty mean towards people like Delora who can't read sarcasm and will instead take such a thing as genuine. How much has been said though doesn't really need further elaboration when it's moreover known details that those who care already know (and have known for years), and me defending my position here is largely redundant.
TLDR; Support's good and all, but when you've seen the entire narrative it's messy asf. Past a point it'd be more mean to pat her on the back for it, and now she sounds like she's going to drag a child into it. 😨
your pettiness and a desire to see her fail blinds you to the entire narrative, you hyper focus on her weaknesses.
can you admit it?
I think we've all learned by now that Turncoat is not in the business of admitting fault.
In this case though, me "admitting to fault" would be me either lying or deceptively minimizing my own position in the argument to try to back out of the conversation. Unlike others who have grown tired of dealing with Delora, as an honest person I'm not the sort to commit to fake lip service (even for a joke or a moment's peace).
Effectively you're asking me to accept a blatant inaccuracy, or even further you'd ask me to lie about it. You either don't know her history and won't bother to look into it or that's the way you aim to portray yourself, so I guess this is where we stop. The whole 'playing dumb' game you do as a dishonest person gets pretty slow and boring past a point.
