You go into a topic about defining people comparatively to media characters, to talk about yourself.
Your ego continues to make me sad.
Surprise buttsex!!!
You go into a topic about defining people comparatively to media characters, to talk about yourself.
Your ego continues to make me sad.
It's the cornerstone product that I sell here, and there's not much substance to I that I spoke. Everything that was to be, has been defined. I'm just curious of what movie character I would be, TC come on feed me feeedd meeee I totally need it. (A silly question since I don't even really do anything here other than the same looping retarded meaningless drivel)
My articulation here isn't great when it comes to trying to think of others and who they'd be, not to mention the lack of self-confidence in such decisions. The ego is exaggerated, its not how I act outside of this forum, this is just the way I present myself to this forum. It's impossible for me to try to be personable and actually be one of the members in this community, the closest to such an encounter and maybe contradicting myself, so egotistically, it is ego, since I would talk with Alice about all my dreams and such, and then I started reading Socrates and we would speak on it briefly as she encouraged me to grow my knowledge on it, then we were discussing my shift in life goals and how I'm soon to enter the army, so if me having a conversation with her about my life goals makes me egotistical, then yea.
Otherwise, I just don't really know what to say, I'm out of touch with you guys, and I don't really know how to actually function here due to restraints I refrain from breaking.
All in all, I think I just get to represent another disappointing waste of time side character NPC that inhabits this forum, there is nothing real to obtain from me, when I speak I just wait your time.
You go into a topic about defining people comparatively to media characters, to talk about yourself.
Your ego continues to make me sad.
It's okay for people to post in this thread what they know of that they think would represent an aspect of their own personality in media portrayed as a more glamourized or 'characterized' hollywood version. If anything I think it would be interesting to compare what you believe represents you vs. what other peoples perception entail. Obviously people know themselves better than anyone else does, so what an individual would pick for themselves would be really interesting to see... I'd love it if everyone picked one for themself just for the sake of fun.
I love this idea of everyone being a movie character, and then putting us all together in one giant movie or tv series.
Yea but TC has a point, I tend to fixate on myself. The comparisons I made to myself were merely silly concepts in my head, some depicting some truths about how I wish to be others not so much, I'm curious how people would depict me, but I know TC would probably place me as some fictional narcissist obsessed with himself.
I don't know if I am truly like that, I don't think I am really. I just tend to fixate inwardly when interacting with this forum in a disorganized, repetitive way.
In Chaotik's case, rather than needing to find himself he ought to explore others to develop himself.
He is stagnating because he cannot take others in.
I would say that you, more so than Chaotik, cannot take others in. But who am I to judge.
I just happened to watch Mike Leigh's Naked (1993) and there is one character that reminds me a little bit of Turncoat:
From the plot:
Intelligent, educated and eloquent, Johnny is also deeply embittered and egotistical. He tends to dominate conversations with his aggressive intellectualism and theories about modern culture. His tactics are based on a particular form of intellectual bullying, directed at strangers and intimate partners alike, and summed up in domineering, scholastic barrages drawn from eclectic sources. His overall behaviour is reckless, self-destructive, and at times borderline sadistic, and shows a penchant for aggressive sexual domination at least twice in the film.
A lot of what that guy does is in line with TC:
Johnny seduces Sophie while treating Louise coldly, but soon tires of her. He leaves and walks around central London, expounding his world view at length to anyone who will listen. Among the people he meets are Archie, a young Scottish man looking for his girlfriend Maggie on Brewer Street, and Brian, a security guard who looks after an empty office building at night, which Johnny calls "the most tedious job in England", while planning to move to a seaside cottage in the future.
After pursuing a drunk woman and rejecting her when he notices a skull and crossbones tattoo on her shoulder, Johnny follows a young cafe worker home but is thrown out when she starts crying. He hitches a ride with a man hanging posters around town until the man, exasperated by Johnny's nonstop haranguing, throws him down in the street and kicks him before driving off with Johnny's duffel bag containing his clothes and books. Johnny wanders the streets and is severely beaten by a wandering gang of thugs.
In Chaotik's case, rather than needing to find himself he ought to explore others to develop himself.
He is stagnating because he cannot take others in.
When you say that, it's hard for me to conceptualize what you are exactly saying by that.
I interact with people on the daily, and there are friends I have that I talk to about deep shit and confide in, and such.
