Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Same over Delora potentially, they both have racing thoughts days over different subject matter that I feel they can't always help on their own. 

Opening the floor to discussing it, seems like opinions are all over the place. 

 i volunteer to start condensing my own threads on my own of all same topic after a 24 hour period with a one hour grace period.

please do not condense my threads yourself, i would find it degrading. if it gets to the point where you feel my threads must start being condensed, please let me do it instead. 

but i dont want to be REQUIRED to condense my own threads right away, but i would like the ability to. 

i only want to be REQUIRED to do it if things get really bad. and you can send me a private message in the chat telling me to do it if you feel it gets that bad and i will.

but i would also like the ability to name condensed threads as well when i make them so people know what topic it is.

please consider being lenient with me, in the sense that you only consider condensing my threads if all else fails.

if i ever ruined the usability of the site i am sorry, and feel guilty, because i genuinely love this website and i would never do something to fuck it up on purpose. 

i am also sorry for claiming you were trying to be a "snake" as i have no way of knowing what is going on in your head and i cannot read your mind. 

i am used to being treated differently or having my intentions misunderstood, and it makes me angry when people treat me different and i was lashing out.

thank you for reading.

Delora said: 

Good said: 

Delora said: 

 yeah a lot of people keep calling posting a lot spam, but i dont think that shits true at all. its like peach says its only spam if its the same thing over and over. and if its different points on the same topic? honestly i would go further and say thats not spam either. only if its the exact same thing being said over and over. for example if one post said "bob suspected of black face?" and then there is a following post "bob exposed: proof for blackface" thats an update and updates should be their own thread.

 I would disagree, it is clearly on the same topic as the first thread and should be a post in it.

 i mean your the owner so, im not going to push it to hard. but thats just my take but since the website belongs to you im not going to start harping at you how to run your site.

If I ran this place without user input, it would be much more different, so you should explain it in a civil and constructive manner.

Delora said: 

Turncoat said: 

Same over Delora potentially, they both have racing thoughts days over different subject matter that I feel they can't always help on their own. 

Opening the floor to discussing it, seems like opinions are all over the place. 

 i volunteer to start condensing my own threads on my own of all same topic after a 24 hour period with a one hour grace period.

please do not condense my threads yourself, i would find it degrading. if it gets to the point where you feel my threads must start being condensed, please let me do it instead. 

but i dont want to be REQUIRED to condense my own threads right away, but i would like the ability to. 

i only want to be REQUIRED to do it if things get really bad. and you can send me a private message in the chat telling me to do it if you feel it gets that bad and i will.

but i would also like the ability to name condensed threads as well when i make them so people know what topic it is.

 

please consider being lenient with me, in the sense that you only consider condensing my threads if all else fails.

if i ever ruined the usability of the site i am sorry, and feel guilty, because i genuinely love this website and i would never do something to fuck it up on purpose. 

i am also sorry for claiming you were trying to be a "snake" as i have no way of knowing what is going on in your head and i cannot read your mind. 

i am used to being treated differently or having my intentions misunderstood, and it makes me angry when people treat me different and i was lashing out.

thank you for reading.

You care too much, idk why, but you shouldnt. Its just some posts.

Anyway, to make it possible for you to do it yourself means I have to develop complicated rules and tools which I really do not want to do... for one person.

edit: + no changes are in effect yet, it will be a few weeks before that happens, if anything happens, in my estimation.

Good said: 

Delora said: 

Turncoat said: 

Same over Delora potentially, they both have racing thoughts days over different subject matter that I feel they can't always help on their own. 

Opening the floor to discussing it, seems like opinions are all over the place. 

 i volunteer to start condensing my own threads on my own of all same topic after a 24 hour period with a one hour grace period.

please do not condense my threads yourself, i would find it degrading. if it gets to the point where you feel my threads must start being condensed, please let me do it instead. 

but i dont want to be REQUIRED to condense my own threads right away, but i would like the ability to. 

i only want to be REQUIRED to do it if things get really bad. and you can send me a private message in the chat telling me to do it if you feel it gets that bad and i will.

but i would also like the ability to name condensed threads as well when i make them so people know what topic it is.

 

please consider being lenient with me, in the sense that you only consider condensing my threads if all else fails.

if i ever ruined the usability of the site i am sorry, and feel guilty, because i genuinely love this website and i would never do something to fuck it up on purpose. 

i am also sorry for claiming you were trying to be a "snake" as i have no way of knowing what is going on in your head and i cannot read your mind. 

i am used to being treated differently or having my intentions misunderstood, and it makes me angry when people treat me different and i was lashing out.

thank you for reading.

You care too much, idk why, but you shouldnt. Its just some posts.

Anyway, to make it possible for you to do it yourself means I have to develop complicated rules and tools which I really do not want to do... for one person.

 

edit: + no changes are in effect yet, it will be a few weeks before that happens, if anything happens, in my estimation.

 okay. although i do think threads all of the same topic should be condensed rather than random threads, and that the threads condensed should be named after said topic

Good said: 

Delora said: 

Turncoat said: 

Same over Delora potentially, they both have racing thoughts days over different subject matter that I feel they can't always help on their own. 

Opening the floor to discussing it, seems like opinions are all over the place. 

 i volunteer to start condensing my own threads on my own of all same topic after a 24 hour period with a one hour grace period.

please do not condense my threads yourself, i would find it degrading. if it gets to the point where you feel my threads must start being condensed, please let me do it instead. 

but i dont want to be REQUIRED to condense my own threads right away, but i would like the ability to. 

i only want to be REQUIRED to do it if things get really bad. and you can send me a private message in the chat telling me to do it if you feel it gets that bad and i will.

but i would also like the ability to name condensed threads as well when i make them so people know what topic it is.

 

please consider being lenient with me, in the sense that you only consider condensing my threads if all else fails.

if i ever ruined the usability of the site i am sorry, and feel guilty, because i genuinely love this website and i would never do something to fuck it up on purpose. 

i am also sorry for claiming you were trying to be a "snake" as i have no way of knowing what is going on in your head and i cannot read your mind. 

i am used to being treated differently or having my intentions misunderstood, and it makes me angry when people treat me different and i was lashing out.

thank you for reading.

You care too much, idk why, but you shouldnt. Its just some posts.

Anyway, to make it possible for you to do it yourself means I have to develop complicated rules and tools which I really do not want to do... for one person.

 

edit: + no changes are in effect yet, it will be a few weeks before that happens, if anything happens, in my estimation.

 this website made my life so much better. 

Delora said: 

Good said: 

Delora said: 

 i volunteer to start condensing my own threads on my own of all same topic after a 24 hour period with a one hour grace period.

please do not condense my threads yourself, i would find it degrading. if it gets to the point where you feel my threads must start being condensed, please let me do it instead. 

but i dont want to be REQUIRED to condense my own threads right away, but i would like the ability to. 

i only want to be REQUIRED to do it if things get really bad. and you can send me a private message in the chat telling me to do it if you feel it gets that bad and i will.

but i would also like the ability to name condensed threads as well when i make them so people know what topic it is.

 

please consider being lenient with me, in the sense that you only consider condensing my threads if all else fails.

if i ever ruined the usability of the site i am sorry, and feel guilty, because i genuinely love this website and i would never do something to fuck it up on purpose. 

i am also sorry for claiming you were trying to be a "snake" as i have no way of knowing what is going on in your head and i cannot read your mind. 

i am used to being treated differently or having my intentions misunderstood, and it makes me angry when people treat me different and i was lashing out.

thank you for reading.

You care too much, idk why, but you shouldnt. Its just some posts.

Anyway, to make it possible for you to do it yourself means I have to develop complicated rules and tools which I really do not want to do... for one person.

 

edit: + no changes are in effect yet, it will be a few weeks before that happens, if anything happens, in my estimation.

 okay. although i do think threads all of the same topic should be condensed rather than random threads, and that the threads condensed should be named after said topic

You could just make less topics overall, seems like the path of least resistance. 

Turncoat said: 

Delora said: 

Good said: 

You care too much, idk why, but you shouldnt. Its just some posts.

Anyway, to make it possible for you to do it yourself means I have to develop complicated rules and tools which I really do not want to do... for one person.

 

edit: + no changes are in effect yet, it will be a few weeks before that happens, if anything happens, in my estimation.

 okay. although i do think threads all of the same topic should be condensed rather than random threads, and that the threads condensed should be named after said topic

You could just make less topics, seems like the path of least resistance. 

 that makes less sense the entire point of sc is that people can express themselves freely.

i agree with peach. same topics should go in condensed threads. it condenses without a form of censorship and even makes the condensing beneficial to the user. 

when i looked at emilys posts it was like i didnt know what i was looking at. and her most recent topics will be at the bottom of that condensed thread. 

although TO BE FAIR when i look at her posts i never know wtf im looking at anyway.

although mind you props to you for condensing them and doing SOMETHING because her shit was spamming the forum more than anyone elses. 

Delora said: 

Turncoat said: 

Delora said: 

 okay. although i do think threads all of the same topic should be condensed rather than random threads, and that the threads condensed should be named after said topic

You could just make less topics, seems like the path of least resistance. 

 that makes less sense the entire point of sc is that people can express themselves freely.

As Meta mentioned though, your two topics in your example could have just been one. 

We can compare your argument with Turquie's recent topics: 

when i looked at emilys posts it was like i didnt know what i was looking at. and her most recent topics will be at the bottom of that condensed thread. 

although TO BE FAIR when i look at her posts i never know wtf im looking at anyway.

The text being beyond your comprehension makes it okay to condense them if you don't like the person? Should Turquie not have the same freedoms just because you don't like her? 

I can follow her posts personally, should they not be condensed? 🤷 

although mind you props to you for condensing them and doing SOMETHING because her shit was spamming the forum more than anyone elses. 

If you check The Turquie Index, there's only been a few problem days. The main day I saw people complaining about the front page being littered in her topics actually was after you bumped a bunch of them in rapid succession.
 

Turncoat said: 

Delora said: 

Turncoat said: 

You could just make less topics, seems like the path of least resistance. 

 that makes less sense the entire point of sc is that people can express themselves freely.

As Meta mentioned though, your two topics in your example could have just been one. 

maybe they could be. its better than randomization so i'll give you that. just as long as a topic thread title can be updated. 

 

We can compare your argument with Turquie's recent topics: 

when i looked at emilys posts it was like i didnt know what i was looking at. and her most recent topics will be at the bottom of that condensed thread. 

although TO BE FAIR when i look at her posts i never know wtf im looking at anyway.

The text being beyond your comprehension makes it okay to condense them if you don't like the person? Should Turquie not have the same freedoms just because you don't like her? 

I can follow her posts personally, should they not be condensed? 🤷 

its harder to follow em when they are disorganized and random. its harder to follow anything that way. maybe for turq it doesn't matter since her stuff is meaningless but its a bad model for everyone. 

although mind you props to you for condensing them and doing SOMETHING because her shit was spamming the forum more than anyone elses. 

If you check The Turquie Index, there's only been a few problem days. The main day I saw people complaining about the front page being littered in her topics actually was after you bumped a bunch of them in rapid succession.

 and who had previously bumped them before me TURNCOAT? just because i want to reply does not mean i want the bumping side effect. you know you reply to her posts or "bump" her posts way more than i do.

anything is in succession including "bumping" when someone is currently active on the site.

if you don't like every new update being at the top of the page change your model.

Delora said: 

its harder to follow em when they are disorganized and random.

They follow a consistent structure and pattern with revisited themes that work out for her like personal tropes. 

I can follow her just fine. 

its harder to follow anything that way. maybe for turq it doesn't matter since her stuff is meaningless but its a bad model for everyone. 

Honestly I see her content as having a lot going on, and if you tried harder rather than demanding she be censored you might be able to keep up with her. 

although mind you props to you for condensing them and doing SOMETHING because her shit was spamming the forum more than anyone elses. 

If you check The Turquie Index, there's only been a few problem days. The main day I saw people complaining about the front page being littered in her topics actually was after you bumped a bunch of them in rapid succession.

 and who had previously bumped them before me TURNCOAT?

In rapid succession to flood the front page with her topics? 

No one actually, rather than bumping her own stuff she usually just makes a new topic. 

just because i want to reply does not mean i want the bumping side effect. you know you reply to her posts or "bump" her posts way more than i do.

It was bumps, a long stream of them, and then people complained about her posts filling the front page.