Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 33414
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?
Good said: 

I am a dude and I wouldn't bang med. She is too crazy and not my type. Maybe if she pays me.

I've stuck my dick in crazy and still wouldn't bang Med. 

What would your price be though? She might be able to afford you. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?
Good said: 

I am a dude and I wouldn't bang med. She is too crazy and not my type. Maybe if she pays me.

I've stuck my dick in crazy and still wouldn't bang Med. 

What would your price be though? She might be able to afford you. 

I am not sure. I guess it would depend on what she wants. Minimum 1000 dollars ofc. She probably can afford it. But I am not going to travel for less than 10k, 5k if its in europe.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 3965
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?

do you want to fuck med tony

 Sug. I'm a dude. If circumstances were different I'd bang Med, but I don't make it a priority or anything. 

 

 ok, so i don't think she wants to bang you.

Posts: 298
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?

do you want to fuck med tony

 Sug. I'm a dude. If circumstances were different I'd bang Med, but I don't make it a priority or anything. 

 

 ok, so i don't think she wants to bang you.

 Sug. I'm a guy. Rejection is a part of manhood, and like most men I don't simply chase after who I would bang if circumstances were different. 

Without any detail, the answer to your question is no, I don't want to bang Med. Though not wanting to doesn't mean it wouldn't be enjoyable.

This is male logic. We're different than women when it comes to the mating rituals, and while women tend to have more options, the man's human experience means we're on alert when our duty to procreate calls.

If a woman's logic were the same, we would've populated like mice in a small cage and failed as a species long ago.

 

Posts: 33414
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?
Canary said: 
Though not wanting to doesn't mean it wouldn't be enjoyable.

Yikes. 

This is male logic. We're different than women when it comes to the mating rituals, and while women tend to have more options, the man's human experience means we're on alert when our duty to procreate calls.

If a woman's logic were the same, we would've populated like mice in a small cage and failed as a species long ago.

In theory, if women were to take up this model you're presenting they'd still only get pregnant once every 9+ months, and with parenting priorities depending on the comfort of their setting that could be another four or five years before it's a viable option again. 


Women actually do have strong procreative urges though, but I guess they don't display like that around you. Once they hit their 30s the whole "Biological Clock" trope starts up even, and the half-week to a week leading up to their period... many prove to be hornier than any man could hope to keep up with. 

Thankfully with birth control and contraceptives, women don't have to wait gaps of time before going at it again. Overtime we are becoming more like the lions that eat their young to ensure more sex, which is perfectly natural. 


Edit: Also, not sure if you noticed or not, but we kinda are doing the overpopulated small cage thing. We at the very least at this scale constitute an Invasive Species, which is why Population Control can be a good thing if we're to be responsible about our place on this planet. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 1/27/2023 6:03:52 PM
Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?
Canary said: 
Though not wanting to doesn't mean it wouldn't be enjoyable.

Yikes. 

So let me get this straight. Enjoying sex is a problem now ?

 

This is male logic. We're different than women when it comes to the mating rituals, and while women tend to have more options, the man's human experience means we're on alert when our duty to procreate calls.

If a woman's logic were the same, we would've populated like mice in a small cage and failed as a species long ago.

In theory, if women were to take up this model you're presenting they'd still only get pregnant once every 9+ months, and with parenting priorities depending on the comfort of their setting that could be another four or five years before it's a viable option again. 

Pregnant every 9 months ? No. But if that were the case, it would be normal for women to give birth every year for 20+ years. That's a big family too big unless you're super rich.

 


Women actually do have strong procreative urges though, but I guess they don't display like that around you.

My girlfriend does. She also laughs at all my jokes and for anyone who knows her, it's obvious how she feels about me just by observing her.

Other than that, no I don't have a whole lot of women chasing after me. Isn't that normal Nathan ? 

 

Once they hit their 30s the whole "Biological Clock" trope starts up even, and the half-week to a week leading up to their period... many prove to be hornier than any man could hope to keep up with. 

Even so, women set high standards for who they have sex with.

Men on the other hand not so much. There is BBW porn featuring morbidly obese women and it makes mad money. Other way around, nope.

Guys don't give a shit if she's smart. If she's super hot that's only preferable.

 


Thankfully with birth control and contraceptives, women don't have to wait gaps of time before going at it again. Overtime we are becoming more like the lions that eat their young to ensure more sex, which is perfectly natural. 

Male lions kill a cub to make a statement to the others. 

A woman who is like the male lion is unattractive and obtuse, major red flag. 

 



Edit: Also, not sure if you noticed or not, but we kinda are doing the overpopulated small cage thing. We at the very least at this scale constitute an Invasive Species, which is why Population Control can be a good thing if we're to be responsible about our place on this planet. 

There's a debate when it comes to overpopulation. Of course you'd drink the overpopulation kool-aid cause you're a treasonous degenerate following orders, but there is also the concern of underpopulation while there's been a decline in our growth for 60 years. 

Cities, and only cities are crammed and they have their rush hours, but they are also plentiful. We can eat any fresh produce anytime of the year without any shortages, even when we consume the most which is in December. Life goes on.  

Also change your avatar, it's a disgusting representation for you.

Posts: 32
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?

He's full of shit how do you not want sex and have it be enjoyable. A bunch of gibberish if you ask me in his self-congratulatory post.

Furthermore I would never think about sleeping with Spatial and I am being kind in my word choice here.

Posts: 3137
-1 votes RE: what's the deal with med?
Itsmed said: 

He's full of shit how do you not want sex and have it be enjoyable. A bunch of gibberish if you ask me in his self-congratulatory post.

I can have sex whenever I want already.

That doesn't mean having sex with someone else wouldn't be pleasant either.

 

Furthermore I would never think about sleeping with Spatial and I am being kind in my word choice here.

 Maybe so, but I'm still the best deal in town lol. 

Posts: 32
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?

BARF

Posts: 33414
0 votes RE: what's the deal with med?
Canary said: 
Though not wanting to doesn't mean it wouldn't be enjoyable.

Yikes. 

So let me get this straight. Enjoying sex is a problem now ?

You seem to think nonconsensual sex would still be enjoyable for you. 

It's not the same energy at all. 

Women actually do have strong procreative urges though, but I guess they don't display like that around you.

My girlfriend does. She also laughs at all my jokes and for anyone who knows her, it's obvious how she feels about me just by observing her.

Other than that, no I don't have a whole lot of women chasing after me. Isn't that normal Nathan ? 

Mostly saying it reflects how much you don't seem to know about women over how few you talk to. 

Once they hit their 30s the whole "Biological Clock" trope starts up even, and the half-week to a week leading up to their period... many prove to be hornier than any man could hope to keep up with. 

Even so, women set high standards for who they have sex with.

Is that how you cope with your aforementioned Rejection that you've externalized as the human condition? 

People like sex, men and women are both people, it's not that complicated. 

Men on the other hand not so much. There is BBW porn featuring morbidly obese women and it makes mad money. Other way around, nope.

It's a fetish, there's women into fat dudes too. 

Most of what you're seeing is a marketing thing. 

Guys don't give a shit if she's smart. If she's super hot that's only preferable.

Gross, I tend to need mental stimulation personally. 

Thankfully with birth control and contraceptives, women don't have to wait gaps of time before going at it again. Overtime we are becoming more like the lions that eat their young to ensure more sex, which is perfectly natural. 

Male lions kill a cub to make a statement to the others. 

No, they do it to get the female open to having sex again. 

It be about fucking, my dude. 

A woman who is like the male lion is unattractive and obtuse, major red flag. 

Female lions are far superior to male ones, and lions overall show us that killing one's own young can be natural. 

Edit: Also, not sure if you noticed or not, but we kinda are doing the overpopulated small cage thing. We at the very least at this scale constitute an Invasive Species, which is why Population Control can be a good thing if we're to be responsible about our place on this planet. 

There's a debate when it comes to overpopulation.

Population numbers ought to be enough of a clue before even looking into living conditions as a result of overcrowding. 

If we were to spread those people out onto untouched land, we'd still be pretty crowded, and at the rate we're going it'll sprawl even further.

When you consider how much land needs to be left undisturbed to grow crops and raise livestock, even within Greenhouse and Factory Farm conditions, you start to see space running out. 

Of course you'd drink the overpopulation kool-aid cause you're a treasonous degenerate following orders, but there is also the concern of underpopulation while there's been a decline in our growth for 60 years. 

Cities, and only cities are crammed and they have their rush hours, but they are also plentiful. We can eat any fresh produce anytime of the year without any shortages, even when we consume the most which is in December. Life goes on.  

There has to be untouched land for cultivation, if every square inch is filled we're fucked. 

Considering the planet is like 71% water, and the water levels are rising, this ought to be concerning to you even if it does not hurt us in our lifetime. While global warming and cooling is a natural phenomenon, at the speed it originally went it allowed for the life on Earth to adapt to it. With people speeding that transition up however we're going to see less adaptation and more extinction. 

Also change your avatar, it's a disgusting representation for you.

Glad you like it..?

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 1/28/2023 12:13:58 AM
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.