and to put it in better context, lena means that out of all family murders, 91% of time its the man doing it, which makes sense, since a woman probably cant.
Knives exist.
To clarify my point here, KNIVES EXIST. If a woman wants to harm or kill a man, they can do it. Many incels and soibois become school shooters for a reason, rather than punching people, so why couldn't a woman take up arms as well, or plan how to take down her assailant to even half the degree that weak men obsess over a future encounter?
Women don't see violence as the immediate solution, while men often have to resist the urge to act that way in order to explore other answers. It is not a matter of physical prowess when we have weapons and cunning to account for, it is a predisposed mentality that affects decision making.
Men need to be held accountable for their impulses.
I thought your argument was too stupid, again naive of me, so i didn't respond
whatever a woman can do, a man can do + extra physical strength
That doesn't stop the pointy end from going stabby-stabby.
The problem here is not one of brawn, but one of impulse. This is why Testosterone is becoming increasingly problematic.
Yes, it does, because if u fail to do a lethal wound as a woman or even a crippling one, you are likely to die. If I am angry, a knife won't even deter me. Esp in a woman. I am not super strong, but I am stronger than pretty much all women in my life (irl). A knife will just piss me off more. Her pleas for mercy are far more likely to stop me than a knife. Clearly, if she has a lucky hit it will work, but it's more likely to be an unlucky hit.
If a man fails to 1 hit kill her, the consequences of that are far less troublesome.
so a woman with a knife still has to fight a man that can use a knife too.
Then she gets a gun? Poisons his sammich or his beer when he demands one? Learns how to do a proper nut-buster with a knee strike?
I don't really see your point here, being a tougher opponent has nothing to do with if they choose to act on it or not. The problem here is moreover how quickly violence or other, quick-release actions are the go-to for men, while women tend to think things through more and resort to violence when other avenues have already been considered. We can even see this in Suicide trends between the sexes, with Men being more prone to crashing a car or shooting themselves compared to women aiming for something like Pills.
I have mentioned you are a smooth brain before, so it is not your fault you don't get my point.
What if she misses? Or doesn't cripple or kill with the first shot? She is in mortal trouble. Obv some men will be afraid. But if they are not, thats where the difference is.
What if a man misses? Woman is gonna run and hide, or if she is not afraid and attacks, he can just bitch slap her, that's where the difference is.
If a woman learns all that to kill her family, she is far more psycho than a man that just does it out of emotion. She is a calculated killer. In fact, most women who do kill are far worse than their male counterparts, because they have to be smarter, they need an edge greater than that of the male killers to pull the same thing off.
Do you know why a man's response is violent and a woman is not? Because for men it works and for women it does not.
In suicide, men are better at it, because they are not pussies. Suicide is kind of a pussy move to begin with, but it requires some courage to actually do it. Shooting your brain is 100% death, unlike pills.
Men crash cars, because they are less fearful of taking risks.
Keep arguing with me and you will make women look like second-class citizens, even tho I do not believe it. The truth is that they were second-class citizens because men took more risks and had more strength and used it to take control. It is not a woman's fault she has less strength, so while we, men, can still take control like in the old days, we are civilized enough to value other characters more than physical strength and to give all people a chance based on their personalities. Taking risks comes from having less fear of the consequences. This is why men die like retards a lot more than women, but also why we are better at suicide. Taking calculated risks is much better and I feel like women are better at it, but I have no real data, it's just a feeling, in general risks are worth taking, however.
the moment you go on this road as a woman, you have set up to fight a tougher opponent. While as a man, you just need to dispose of people(ur wife and children) with seriously inferior strength, it is child's play, for the average man vs woman.
school shooters are children. am i naive for thinking that I do not have to explain further on this point?
School shooters are boys, not boys and girls.
Either way you can't deny how much more violence is committed by men, and how many of those men aren't strong.
Girls choose to kill themselves instead of taking revenge on their bullies because they are afraid of confrontation.
Men are better at certain things and women are better at other things.
Welcome to the real world.
