Sociopath Community

Tryptamine said: 

What problems do middle children have?

They seem oddly self-absorbed and defensive, likely a chip on their shoulder over how their eldest sibling got the best of everything. 

I guess that's inevitable when they have to feel like they're competing for everything at a pre-existing disadvantage, even something as simple as getting attention. By comparison, the eldest child and only children both seem much more well-adjusted to having time alone, and are generally less compromising over how they were allowed to live a life closer to how they wanted to with less distractions. 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

What problems do middle children have?

They seem oddly self-absorbed and defensive, likely a chip on their shoulder over how their eldest sibling got the best of everything. 

I guess that's inevitable when they have to feel like they're competing for everything at a pre-existing disadvantage, even something as simple as getting attention. By comparison, the eldest child and only children both seem much more well-adjusted to having time alone, and are generally less compromising over how they were allowed to live a life closer to how they wanted to with less distractions. 

 Single child thinks he knows better than a real middle child.

I also thought it was funny when you tried to make yourself out to be anything like a middle child, while you have no siblings.

You can read about all this shit online. Writers themselves have siblings and various "studies" all fence with one another and generalize on the dynamics between siblings and they all change.

While older siblings assume some position of power, that doesn't mean the subject for every case is worthy, or good for that position. In my experience the older sibling came from a place of insecurity. I'm even the good looking one and today I'm the richest maybe the richest of all our known cousins now. Self taught with crazy skills. 

It sounds bad to say, but quite literally my older Brother has nothing on me. My late Father used to say that, and our older half sibling sees it too. I don't compete with any of them.

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

What problems do middle children have?

They seem oddly self-absorbed and defensive, likely a chip on their shoulder over how their eldest sibling got the best of everything. 

I guess that's inevitable when they have to feel like they're competing for everything at a pre-existing disadvantage, even something as simple as getting attention. By comparison, the eldest child and only children both seem much more well-adjusted to having time alone, and are generally less compromising over how they were allowed to live a life closer to how they wanted to with less distractions. 

 Single child thinks he knows better than a real middle child.

I just know that I've spent a surprising amount of time seeing "Middle Children" band together to exclaim why they are superior. 

It has to be compensation. 

I also thought it was funny when you tried to make yourself out to be anything like a middle child, while you have no siblings.

I was just being fecetious over the use of the word "middle", there has since then been nowhere to poke at it over. 

While older siblings assume some position of power, that doesn't mean the subject for every case is worthy, or good for that position. In my experience the older sibling came from a place of insecurity. I'm even the good looking one and today I'm the richest maybe the richest of all our known cousins now. Self taught with crazy skills. 

I can definitely tell from your older narratives alongside how you bring him up in this topic that you have a chip on your shoulder over your older brother, hence you lapping at his tears when you hear that he is now just another middle child, like you are. 

It seems so petty to me, an only child. 

It sounds bad to say, but quite literally my older Brother has nothing on me.

He has so much real estate in your head that he ought to rent it out. You even when angry begin conflating him with me, and Satan. 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

What problems do middle children have?

They seem oddly self-absorbed and defensive, likely a chip on their shoulder over how their eldest sibling got the best of everything. 

I guess that's inevitable when they have to feel like they're competing for everything at a pre-existing disadvantage, even something as simple as getting attention. By comparison, the eldest child and only children both seem much more well-adjusted to having time alone, and are generally less compromising over how they were allowed to live a life closer to how they wanted to with less distractions. 

 Single child thinks he knows better than a real middle child.

I just know that I've spent a surprising amount of time seeing "Middle Children" band together to exclaim why they are superior. 

It has to be compensation. 

I don't know about them. There are weak ass middle children out there, but strong ones too. You want to generalize.

It's been reported that the 2nd born is more athletic. I saw this with my friends too. The 2nd born was strong as an ox and was more handsome. I resonated with that.

In my case I have a more interesting education that's been put to use, I'm a sick guitarist. A rare one at that. I'm taller. Stronger. I never had to boast about these things but on topic I'd be the first to know.

Without siblings, you REALLY believe, that your parents couldn't possibly make someone more gifted than you are ( which you aren't ) and I can tell that would cross you.

I also thought it was funny when you tried to make yourself out to be anything like a middle child, while you have no siblings.

I was just being fecetious over the use of the word "middle", there has since then been nowhere to poke at it over. 

While older siblings assume some position of power, that doesn't mean the subject for every case is worthy, or good for that position. In my experience the older sibling came from a place of insecurity. I'm even the good looking one and today I'm the richest maybe the richest of all our known cousins now. Self taught with crazy skills. 

I can definitely tell from your older narratives alongside how you bring him up in this topic that you have a chip on your shoulder over your older brother, hence you lapping at his tears when you hear that he is now just another middle child, like you are. 

It seems so petty to me, an only child. 

Of course I have a chip on my shoulder. At 21 I damn near killed him out of anger. Just because I got a Superbike doesn't mean he had to turn everyone at work against me. His friends new it. I never spoke to him for 7 years and when I come back I find all these lies he said against me. He's an insecure little man. When my Father died he tried to rob us, I had to speak to him through a lawyer for 5 years. In the end we won, and that was because my Lawyer started talking to the firm. My Brother's lawyer was the son of the owner of the firm he worked for, and we could've destroyed that firm by suing them and they would've lost their license.

In turn I cannot see my Niece and Nephew, and they cannot see their other cousin. He destroyed the family and he won't change. We know he forged the will to get the business to himself, we didn't really care, he stole gold bars from us and a lot of money. Under his ownership the business went down. Sad but true, it's done for.

No offence but he's a lot like you are. We don't like him.

It sounds bad to say, but quite literally my older Brother has nothing on me.

He has so much real estate in your head that he ought to rent it out. You even when angry begin conflating him with me, and Satan. 

 Is that so. What do you have on me Nate ? Are you talented ? Did you save anyone for the pandemic ?

Yes you are like him. It was amazing how you said I doxxed all those people, which was a lie. Even Chapo had to laugh when you said I doxxed him, when clearly you did that. You gave away his address didn't you. 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

What problems do middle children have?

They seem oddly self-absorbed and defensive, likely a chip on their shoulder over how their eldest sibling got the best of everything. 

I guess that's inevitable when they have to feel like they're competing for everything at a pre-existing disadvantage, even something as simple as getting attention. By comparison, the eldest child and only children both seem much more well-adjusted to having time alone, and are generally less compromising over how they were allowed to live a life closer to how they wanted to with less distractions. 

 Single child thinks he knows better than a real middle child.

I just know that I've spent a surprising amount of time seeing "Middle Children" band together to exclaim why they are superior. 

It has to be compensation. 

I don't know about them. There are weak ass middle children out there, but strong ones too. You want to generalize.

Isn't that in relation to this topic? Rather than call out any individual we are aiming to illustrate differences across the board. 

I keep seeing tons of jealous middle children, it's sad when they can't even escape it into adulthood to your extent. 

It's been reported that the 2nd born is more athletic. I saw this with my friends too. The 2nd born was strong as an ox and was more handsome. I resonated with that.

Weird, I kept seeing firstborns having better sports prowess. 

Could be coincidence, but it seems to go along with the data that talks over how each subsequently born male tends to report lower T-counts. 

In my case I have a more interesting education that's been put to use, I'm a sick guitarist. A rare one at that. I'm taller. Stronger. I never had to boast about these things but on topic I'd be the first to know.

These could just as easily be the traits of your parents comingling into a different end product, rather than you being superior over being the second born. 

Without siblings, you REALLY believe, that your parents couldn't possibly make someone more gifted than you are ( which you aren't ) and I can tell that would cross you.

Oh no I totally think my parents could have made a better child than me, but thankfully such a spawn does not exist. 

 

While older siblings assume some position of power, that doesn't mean the subject for every case is worthy, or good for that position. In my experience the older sibling came from a place of insecurity. I'm even the good looking one and today I'm the richest maybe the richest of all our known cousins now. Self taught with crazy skills. 

I can definitely tell from your older narratives alongside how you bring him up in this topic that you have a chip on your shoulder over your older brother, hence you lapping at his tears when you hear that he is now just another middle child, like you are. 

It seems so petty to me, an only child. 

Of course I have a chip on my shoulder. At 21 I damn near killed him out of anger.

More proof that Middle Children have problems. 

By comparison, only children get to live pain-free of such things, having only themselves as their own company. The older sibling, the closest in mindset to the only child, by comparison has to feel dragged down by the lesser born that followed them. 

Just because I got a Superbike doesn't mean he had to turn everyone at work against me. His friends new it. I never spoke to him for 7 years and when I come back I find all these lies he said against me. He's an insecure little man.

Omfg you sound like the insecure little man though. 

Look at the tone it's so petty, clearly only children are superior. 

You gave away his address didn't you. 

Nope, but you're going to keep asking that anyway.

I can say I did it sarcastically and you'd take it as fact, and I could say I didn't do it and you'll say it's a lie. You are not after the truth, you are merely an opportunist. 

Honestly like 90% of parents don't deserve to be. Most of them clearly play favorites especially to the newest one or most successful one. Pure ego and survivalism dealing with mine.

My sisters and I don't have beef, but we have little ib common and we don't socialize with each other. I could see us reaching a point in adulthood where we may only talk at holidays

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

What problems do middle children have?

They seem oddly self-absorbed and defensive, likely a chip on their shoulder over how their eldest sibling got the best of everything. 

I guess that's inevitable when they have to feel like they're competing for everything at a pre-existing disadvantage, even something as simple as getting attention. By comparison, the eldest child and only children both seem much more well-adjusted to having time alone, and are generally less compromising over how they were allowed to live a life closer to how they wanted to with less distractions. 

 Single child thinks he knows better than a real middle child.

I just know that I've spent a surprising amount of time seeing "Middle Children" band together to exclaim why they are superior. 

It has to be compensation. 

I don't know about them. There are weak ass middle children out there, but strong ones too. You want to generalize.

Isn't that in relation to this topic? Rather than call out any individual we are aiming to illustrate differences across the board. 

I keep seeing tons of jealous middle children, it's sad when they can't even escape it into adulthood to your extent. 

Assume what you want. I'm actually experienced on the subject.

The First born was first and for a time things were good, until there was another and attention became divided.

Case after case

It's been reported that the 2nd born is more athletic. I saw this with my friends too. The 2nd born was strong as an ox and was more handsome. I resonated with that.

Weird, I kept seeing firstborns having better sports prowess. 

Could be coincidence, but it seems to go along with the data that talks over how each subsequently born male tends to report lower T-counts. 

Why lie in a place where the truth runs rampid ?

Again and agan.

In my case I have a more interesting education that's been put to use, I'm a sick guitarist. A rare one at that. I'm taller. Stronger. I never had to boast about these things but on topic I'd be the first to know.

These could just as easily be the traits of your parents comingling into a different end product, rather than you being superior over being the second born. 

You're still getting debunked.

Without siblings, you REALLY believe, that your parents couldn't possibly make someone more gifted than you are ( which you aren't ) and I can tell that would cross you.

Oh no I totally think my parents could have made a better child than me, but thankfully such a spawn does not exist. 

Then you contradicted yourself when you claim younger siblings to be disadvantaged to first born.

Like everything else you've written the rest is trash and has already been dispelled. 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Single child thinks he knows better than a real middle child.

I just know that I've spent a surprising amount of time seeing "Middle Children" band together to exclaim why they are superior. 

It has to be compensation. 

I don't know about them. There are weak ass middle children out there, but strong ones too. You want to generalize.

Isn't that in relation to this topic? Rather than call out any individual we are aiming to illustrate differences across the board. 

I keep seeing tons of jealous middle children, it's sad when they can't even escape it into adulthood to your extent. 

Assume what you want. I'm actually experienced on the subject.

You are a single case among many, and you are rife with the bias of being in the middle of it. 

Other middle children are also better off ignoring you as an example, as your problems over your brother keep proving my point. 

The First born was first and for a time things were good, until there was another and attention became divided.

Case after case

Is this motherfucker posting Quora at me as a reasonable resource? 🤣

I see how you can carry on as you do now. 

It's been reported that the 2nd born is more athletic. I saw this with my friends too. The 2nd born was strong as an ox and was more handsome. I resonated with that.

Weird, I kept seeing firstborns having better sports prowess. 

Could be coincidence, but it seems to go along with the data that talks over how each subsequently born male tends to report lower T-counts. 

Why lie in a place where the truth runs rampid ?

Again and agan.

I could ask you the same, this isn't about Testosterone, this is about Sports Success. Even the mini-descriptions don't support your argument. 

It's effectively boiling it down to the increase in Estrogen giving them an edge in learning and them being raised within constraints that tell them they have to try harder, sort of like how Women are beginning to overtake Men. 

Try again. 

Without siblings, you REALLY believe, that your parents couldn't possibly make someone more gifted than you are ( which you aren't ) and I can tell that would cross you.

Oh no I totally think my parents could have made a better child than me, but thankfully such a spawn does not exist. 

Then you contradicted yourself when you claim younger siblings to be disadvantaged to first born.

I already explained how trait comingling between parents can produce unrelated offspring from one another. If the first born took more after a short mother and the second born took more after a tall father than the second child will show taller, potentially stronger traits physically, but if those traits had been born in the opposite order then you'd have seen the first born being even more mighty than the lower-T secondborn. In short, if you had been born before your older brother and you kept to the same trait partitions, you'd be even taller and stronger while he'd likely be a little shorter and notably smarter. 

Part of it is tumbling of traits between both of their lineages, but the other part is as simple as how the mother's womb works. With each subsequent male born (specifically males) the mother's body begins to fight the T-Count being produced from their offspring and women who've had a child before tend to reflect higher Estrogen counts than those who never have. 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Single child thinks he knows better than a real middle child.

I just know that I've spent a surprising amount of time seeing "Middle Children" band together to exclaim why they are superior. 

It has to be compensation. 

I don't know about them. There are weak ass middle children out there, but strong ones too. You want to generalize.

Isn't that in relation to this topic? Rather than call out any individual we are aiming to illustrate differences across the board. 

I keep seeing tons of jealous middle children, it's sad when they can't even escape it into adulthood to your extent. 

Assume what you want. I'm actually experienced on the subject.

You are a single case among many, and you are rife with the bias of being in the middle of it. 

Other middle children are also better off ignoring you as an example, as your problems over your brother keep proving my point.

Untrue. I said some middle children are as generalized, some are not. It's a case to case basis, however the jealousy thing widely happens with the older siblings.

The First born was first and for a time things were good, until there was another and attention became divided.

Case after case

Is this motherfucker posting Quora at me as a reasonable resource? 🤣

I see how you can carry on as you do now. 

It's real people writing about real experiences. A room full of oldest and middle siblings answering the question. That is credible. Also it isn't Wikipedia. What's your source ?

It's been reported that the 2nd born is more athletic. I saw this with my friends too. The 2nd born was strong as an ox and was more handsome. I resonated with that.

Weird, I kept seeing firstborns having better sports prowess. 

Could be coincidence, but it seems to go along with the data that talks over how each subsequently born male tends to report lower T-counts. 

Why lie in a place where the truth runs rampid ?

Again and agan.

I could ask you the same, this isn't about Testosterone, this is about Sports Success. Even the mini-descriptions don't support your argument. 

It's effectively boiling it down to the increase in Estrogen giving them an edge in learning and them being raised within constraints that tell them they have to try harder, sort of like how Women are beginning to overtake Men. 

Try again. 

You said you keep seeing first borns having better sports prowess. I say that isn't the case with myself, what i've seen, and what the public notices.

It's just that simple. You have no resources to back you either.

Without siblings, you REALLY believe, that your parents couldn't possibly make someone more gifted than you are ( which you aren't ) and I can tell that would cross you.

Oh no I totally think my parents could have made a better child than me, but thankfully such a spawn does not exist. 

Then you contradicted yourself when you claim younger siblings to be disadvantaged to first born.

I already explained how trait comingling between parents can produce unrelated offspring from one another. If the first born took more after a short mother and the second born took more after a tall father than the second child will show taller, potentially stronger traits physically, but if those traits had been born in the opposite order then you'd have seen the first born being even more mighty than the lower-T secondborn. In short, if you had been born before your older brother and you kept to the same trait partitions, you'd be even taller and stronger while he'd likely be a little shorter and notably smarter. 

Oh please. Like I would've been even better HAD I been born first, while my older Brother isn't. Shut up.

My younger Brother is also taller than our older Brother. He's also 2nd strongest, and without a doubt brighter than our older Brother. My Older Brother has some redeeming qualities, but sadly he goes the way of the fool.