Sociopath Community

Xena said: 

Lenalee said: 

Xena said: 

 lol my point is that sugar is a worse stalker than med ever was.

Never was

So med never was a stalker.

Thanks for finally admitting it.

How are Sugar and Med even remotely similar? You keep trying to tie them together but I just don't see it, the logic's super weird in this tangent. 

And sugar stalked and doxx'd multiple people on this forum.

Yourself included.

Nope

So who doxx'd Turncoat, then?

Pretty sure it was sugargirl.

I just said Sugar didn't do it. 

lol Idgaf about the old posts.

I found it absolutely idiotic the way that stupid bitch followed me to every effing post I made for most of 2016, misquoting the fiction I wrote. And then again every time I popped in here to say hello to somebody else.

That is stalker behaviour waaaay beyond anything med was ever guilty of.

And hell no. I would never want that crazy cunt to love me lol

She'd probably be 10x more annoying

So in short, you're like "I don't know Med very well, so she's at least neutral compared to others" as a reason to try to weigh them against eachother, rather than actually learning more about who Med is first. You then acted like being told to learn about her was offensive, then continue to talk like you have a stake in this race. 

You're defending a blurry archetype, not a person. Sug and I are not coolsies but your logic is wiggy here. 

Xena said: 

Lenalee said: 

Xena said: 

Lenalee said: 

Xena said: 

Turncoat said: 

Xena said: 

She said smthg like "this does make my ass look better"

I think you got socially phished, if the story is as it's been presented here then I'm pretty sure this was Jim linking a rando to see how you'd respond. 

Xena said: 

Lenalee said: 

 lol anybody who can say these things about med while defending sugar... smh

Apples and Oranges dawg, not even related to one another. 

 lol my point is that sugar is a worse stalker than med ever was.

Never was

So med never was a stalker.

Thanks for finally admitting it.

 

She's also made up/twisted/fabricated/misquoted some vile rumours about people.

That bitch is like Rita Skeeter on acid.

You not liking people throwing your old posts at you does not a Rita Skeeter make. 

I found it absolutely idiotic the way that stupid bitch followed me to every effing post I made for most of 2016, misquoting the fiction I wrote. And then again every time I popped in here to say hello to somebody else.

 

And hell no. I would never want that crazy cunt to love me lol

She'd probably be 10x more annoying

 Oh was it fictional the same way that CS claimed it was fictional what she admitted here? It's not stalking behavior if she's quoting your posts. Med literally had to be escorted from Chapos job because she was trespassing 

 

 

Um... yeah, it kind of is stalking if she does it literally hundreds of times in 2 years.

Especially if she misquotes my posts. 

 

Doesn't Chapo work in a restaurant?

So prove med was stalking him. Get me surveillance cam footage  :D

I know you people.

If it actually happened, you film it and you post it.

So do it. 

 You could just ask Chapo. And no it's not stalking to quote your posts. If it was i would be considered a stalker as would many people on this forum. 

Xena said: 

Socially phished lol

Jim got nothing out of me.

Not even a reaction.

So the replies here today don't count as a reaction? 

@ Lena: Well yeah, you were following me around for the first 9 months, too. 

January to Septemberish of 2016

What makes you different from sugar is that you stopped after a few months.

Sugar never did, even after the truth came out.

I wish I could have seen her face when I told her that 90% of everything I've ever written here was fiction and that Ed tied myself and Mee as the 2 members with the most puppets lol

Turncoat said: 

Xena said: 

Socially phished lol

Jim got nothing out of me.

Not even a reaction.

So the replies here today don't count as a reaction? 

 No.

They're relevant to the thread.

I wouldn't have thought about it if you hadn't mentioned Peach's pics.

Xena said: 

Turncoat said: 

Xena said: 

Socially phished lol

Jim got nothing out of me.

Not even a reaction.

So the replies here today don't count as a reaction? 

 No.

They're relevant to the thread.

Yeah, but they show that you've held onto it, and other things you've said since then may have given that away as well. 

Xena said: 

@ Lena: Well yeah, you were following me around for the first 9 months, too. 

January to Septemberish of 2016

 

What makes you different from sugar is that you stopped after a few months.

Sugar never did, even after the truth came out.

I wish I could have seen her face when I told her that 90% of everything I've ever written here was fiction and that Ed tied myself and Mee as the 2 members with the most puppets lol

 

 I don't believe your "truth", the whole everything is fictional thing. CS has tried this too. If it was it simply means you are not an honest person and i cannot trust anything you say hence no reason to believe the "everything i wrote was fictional"

Lenalee said: 

Xena said: 

@ Lena: Well yeah, you were following me around for the first 9 months, too. 

January to Septemberish of 2016

 

What makes you different from sugar is that you stopped after a few months.

Sugar never did, even after the truth came out.

I wish I could have seen her face when I told her that 90% of everything I've ever written here was fiction and that Ed tied myself and Mee as the 2 members with the most puppets lol

 

 I don't believe your "truth", the whole everything is fictional thing. CS has tried this too. If it was it simply means you are not an honest person and i cannot trust anything you say hence no reason to believe the "everything i wrote was fictional"

 Why, yes  :)

The same way I can't trust anything you or sugar say bc you lie and twist the things other people say until they barely resemble the original statements anymore.

Not just the things I say. You've done this to more than one member's words.

And no, I'm not honest when I'm in the company of liars.

When I'm here, I'm a mirror, cupcake.

Nothing more  :)

Turncoat said: 

Xena said: 

Turncoat said: 

Xena said: 

Socially phished lol

Jim got nothing out of me.

Not even a reaction.

So the replies here today don't count as a reaction? 

 No.

They're relevant to the thread.

Yeah, but they show that you've held onto it, and other things you've said since then may have given that away as well. 

 

 What? I don't recall mentioning it.

This is the first time I've thought of it since the day Jimmy posted it.

I'm not like you people lol

When I leave SC and hit the off switch, it's like turning off an episode of "Friends" or smthg.

I forget quickly. You dumb dumbs don't leak over into my real life the way the evening news does.

Xena said: 

Lenalee said: 

Xena said: 

@ Lena: Well yeah, you were following me around for the first 9 months, too. 

January to Septemberish of 2016

 

What makes you different from sugar is that you stopped after a few months.

Sugar never did, even after the truth came out.

I wish I could have seen her face when I told her that 90% of everything I've ever written here was fiction and that Ed tied myself and Mee as the 2 members with the most puppets lol

 

 I don't believe your "truth", the whole everything is fictional thing. CS has tried this too. If it was it simply means you are not an honest person and i cannot trust anything you say hence no reason to believe the "everything i wrote was fictional"

 Why, yes  :)

The same way I can't trust anything you or sugar say bc you lie and twist the things other people say until they barely resemble the original statements anymore.

Not just the things I say. You've done this to more than one member's words.

 

And no, I'm not honest when I'm in the company of liars.

When I'm here, I'm a mirror, cupcake.

Nothing more  :)

 Yes, you're a liar lying about past events being fictional. Good talk!