Sociopath Community

AppleGenius said: 

Canary said: 

The narcissistic transgender ideology seems to have this pattern of bullying other people into compliance.

Lol that you're trying to make it seem like your method is peaceful and conflict-averse while the opposition is an angry bully is hilarious. You're the bully, and they do to you only in response to what you do to  them.

It is peaceful. You claim to be a female here for what ? A week or so now, and on the first sign on disagreement you start foaming at the mouth.

The narcissistic transgender is sensitive, and we see it happening often enough.

A man who fails to control his emotions will have a short fuse.

For example Legga chooses to believe that addressing me as a female will hurt me, so he does it, because I don't change my mind about him. A taste of my medicine he might think, while I insist to be speaking the truth about him without being spiteful. 

So basically you think I'm bullying you because I'm misgendering you? But you're not bullying others by misgendering them. Lmfao whatever you say, lady Tonella. The hypocrisy is strong with this one.

To be clear. Your spitefulness is likened to a fly trying to pass through tempered glass, and I don't feel anything. It kinda makes me laugh when you resort to pettiness over me denying your "new" claim. That's very narcissistic.

Your anger is the mark of thought policing.

In the modern world's terminology, gender is about identity while sex is what they are born with. Not to nitpick but what you're going on about would be her sex, rather than her gender.

In less words, gender is social while sex is genetic.

Bingo. The gender is by definition a social construct.

But I'd argue that I am also biologically a woman, something that Spatial will never accept.

 lol.

Dude....

- You are a Father.

- You produced semen and impregnated your ex wife.

- If you had sex when you were in a gay relationship ( this year) that would've been homosexuality.

- Penis.

Social constructs are made up, and this one is the work of evil. You do NOT meet the definition of female or woman at all.

There's some kind of hypnosis going on here. You've always been so easily programmable Legga, and now this and your ego is hard defensive about it.

You shouldn't be a scientist cause science cannot be makebelief. It seeks to prove itself wrong in search of something better. You argue to be a biological woman and you're so far gone, you don't see how you're defending a lie.

.

.

.

They call this progressive. It's a mental disorder. NPD. Some people will play along when men wear makeup and dresses and "act" while others aren't acting. 

If it upsets you that not everyone will change their mind about your sex like you did, then you're spoiled. The world won't revolve around you.

AppleGenius said: 

Turncoat said: 

AppleGenius said: 

In the modern world's terminology, gender is about identity while sex is what they are born with. Not to nitpick but what you're going on about would be her sex, rather than her gender.

In less words, gender is social while sex is genetic.

Bingo. The gender is by definition a social construct.

But I'd argue that I am also biologically a woman, something that Spatial will never accept.

You would, but it wouldn't be accepted even by many of the LGBTQ+, unless the terminology meant to split gender and sex changes again anyway. 

Even the term 'Sex Change Operation' has been changed into 'Gender Confirmation Surgery' to try to prevent any confusion.

What part of me is not biologically a woman?

Your sex. 

Dove said: 

Social constructs are made up, and this one is the work of evil. 

I don't know if I'd consider the normalization of an aesthetic disability 'evil', it seems more evil to me to demonize people for it rather than practice tolerance and acceptance of an issue that, otherwise, doesn't tend to impair their functionality. 

If this were to be made into a productivity answer, wouldn't it make sense to have people be less shocked by what they are seeing by normalizing it alongside having those who feel the need to reconstruct themselves be able to do so to such a point as to improve their confidence in other areas of their lives as well, such as occupational or philanthropic, by being less distracted by feeling like they are in the wrong form? 

Personally I'd prefer a post-genderized society, where men and women can dress as eachother without some construct holding back their fashion choices. If not for the gender divide in aesthetics a lot of this wouldn't even be a problem, and even historically men used to wear high heels, makeup, beauty wigs, and even sported the color pink as a manly color, and women shaving themselves wasn't as commonplace until the 1900s. 

You shouldn't be a scientist cause science cannot be makebelief.

It is Science that is granting hormone replacement therapy to the public. 

They call this progressive. It's a mental disorder. NPD. Some people will play along when men wear makeup and dresses and "act" while others aren't acting. 

Again there's a wide, wide spectrum of people that fall under the trans label. A lot of them aren't narcs, even among those that identify as things outside of the gender binary. 

Dysmorphia can come from a lot of different origins. 

Turncoat said: 

Dove said: 

Social constructs are made up, and this one is the work of evil. 

I don't know if I'd consider the normalization of an aesthetic disability 'evil', it seems more evil to me to demonize people for it rather than practice tolerance and acceptance of an issue that, otherwise, doesn't tend to impair their functionality. 

I demonize thought policing. Insisting others address you accordingly, or else is crossing the line. That in itself is dysfunctional. If everyone were that way, we wouldn't make it.

If this were to be made into a productivity answer, wouldn't it make sense to have people be less shocked by what they are seeing by normalizing it alongside having those who feel the need to reconstruct themselves be able to do so to such a point as to improve their confidence in other areas of their lives as well, such as occupational or philanthropic? 

It's being normalized as we speak and what do we see ?

- Mutilated children that grow up in regret. Puberty blockers, poor mental health.

- Sex education teaches reproduction is sex's secondary function, while perversion like anal and oral is taught to be sex's primary function. I'm sorry, but in the grand scheme, sex between men and women is important.

- Mutilated men who regret cutting off their wii

- Men dominating women's olympics

- Degeneracy. ( No offence )

- Drag Queens dressed in adult attire grooming kindergarten children to be queer. 

- Thought policing

- Anti truth ( Anti science )

These are some of the various dysfunctions of transgenderism. It's a burden to the transgrnder themselves to live in fear of discrimination.

The above points I made, without a shadow of a doubt, are uncool.

You shouldn't be a scientist cause science cannot be makebelief.

It is Science that is granting hormone replacement therapy to the public. 

Shut the fuck up. What's anti science is Legga argument he's a biological woman.

They call this progressive. It's a mental disorder. NPD. Some people will play along when men wear makeup and dresses and "act" while others aren't acting. 

Again there's a wide, wide spectrum of people that fall under the trans label. A lot of them aren't narcs, even among those that identify as things outside of the gender binary. 

 That is obvious, but thanks for your effort I suppose.

This is the "Transgender Narcissist" thread. In here we're talking about Transgenders who display severe NPD attributes, like becoming offensive and defensive when others don't agree with them.

In my opinion, normalizing this is basically the world appeasing disorderly conduct, the effects are damaging. Even God finds it to be an abomination, and why isn't it one ?

Dove said: 

It is peaceful. You claim to be a female here for what ? A week or so now, and on the first sign on disagreement you start foaming at the mouth.

The narcissistic transgender is sensitive, and we see it happening often enough.

A man who fails to control his emotions will have a short fuse.

Lol. It's sort of interesting to picture what kind of an imaginary person it is you're fighting. You predicted that my wife has blue hair, has nose piercings etc, like this stereotypical leftist feminist LGBTQ+ girl, and that's why I'm a feminist. She's very conservative. You predicted that I want to look pretty so I want to be a woman. The truth is I couldn't care less, I actually want to be a man, but unfortunately I'm not a man. You think I'm angry at you for misgendering me. The truth is I'm just mirroring exactly what you're doing.

You're so wrapped up in your little bubble.

To be clear. Your spitefulness is likened to a fly trying to pass through tempered glass, and I don't feel anything. It kinda makes me laugh when you resort to pettiness over me denying your "new" claim. That's very narcissistic.

Your anger is the mark of thought policing.

Lol. I mean, I'm just doing what you're doing. So..... I guess you're thought policing?

 lol.

Dude....

- You are a Father.

- You produced semen and impregnated your ex wife.

- If you had sex when you were in a gay relationship ( this year) that would've been homosexuality.

- Penis.

https://vocaroo.com/1eOGXvw8tRal 

Social constructs are made up, and this one is the work of evil. You do NOT meet the definition of female or woman at all.

I'm pretty sure I do.

There's some kind of hypnosis going on here. You've always been so easily programmable Legga, and now this and your ego is hard defensive about it.

You shouldn't be a scientist cause science cannot be makebelief. It seeks to prove itself wrong in search of something better. You argue to be a biological woman and you're so far gone, you don't see how you're defending a lie.

I'm a pretty good scientist. Way better than you ever will be. I mean, I do science for a living.

I think you just can't accept that someone would have different opinions from yours. You're being ludicrous. You think I'm a man, when I've always been a woman.

.

.

.

They call this progressive. It's a mental disorder. NPD. Some people will play along when men wear makeup and dresses and "act" while others aren't acting. 

If it upsets you that not everyone will change their mind about your sex like you did, then you're spoiled. The world won't revolve around you.

I care much less about what you think than you think.

Dove said: 

Turncoat said: 

Dove said: 

Social constructs are made up, and this one is the work of evil. 

I don't know if I'd consider the normalization of an aesthetic disability 'evil', it seems more evil to me to demonize people for it rather than practice tolerance and acceptance of an issue that, otherwise, doesn't tend to impair their functionality. 

I demonize thought policing. Insisting others address you accordingly, or else is crossing the line.

What if they don't insist, and only defend themselves when otherwise attacked over trying to dress as or appear as 'the other'? If they weren't being so pushy about forcing you to accept them, would you accept them and would the bullying stop? 

Again I don't push for people to call me one gender or the other, I simply state that which feels right to me and what I've looked into that corroborates with it in either my case or in similar ones. Even from this position of tolerance however I still am met with my fair share of mockery, so what would you ask that I do, say nothing back at them over my stance over how I have the divergent opinion? 

If this were to be made into a productivity answer, wouldn't it make sense to have people be less shocked by what they are seeing by normalizing it alongside having those who feel the need to reconstruct themselves be able to do so to such a point as to improve their confidence in other areas of their lives as well, such as occupational or philanthropic? 

It's being normalized as we speak and what do we see ?

- Mutilated children that grow up in regret. Puberty blockers, poor mental health.
- Mutilated men who regret cutting off their wii
- Men dominating women's olympics
- Thought policing

The early stages of any radical change always will yield extreme results in it's infancy. Weird shit's been happening to people before the 'normalizing' too, and even during it while otherwise lacking context that'd link it to a broader issue. 

- Sex education teaches reproduction is sex's secondary function, while perversion like anal and oral is taught to be sex's primary function. I'm sorry, but in the grand scheme, sex between men and women is important. 

I can more than imagine where your arguments for anal will go, but what's wrong with oral sex? To me it seems more practical than the pullout method, it feels really good, as the one giving it it can be fun too, and sometimes it's just more convenient (especially when outside). It promotes bonding between individuals and primes both partners for further sexual activity, even increasing the odds of conception as the bodies become more adjusted to the habit. The post-orgasmic state is also a prime time for building trust with someone, the brain's juicing in those chems at that time. 

Semen has interesting properties that are only a factor when consumed, even being promoted in the field by some as having antidepressant qualities as well as stress relieving ones. They are even questioning if it helps with going to sleep over being a potential source of melatonin. In time we might find that it is actually beneficial to eat our own sperm. 🤣

- Drag Queens dressed in adult attire grooming kindergarten children to be queer. 

You at most can groom someone to be bisexual, they aren't actively trying to push that they don't accept their other when it comes to gender when they push for general acceptance. They want the options to be understood, so that if one is straight or gay that they don't feel trapped in a closet over it. 

They aren't pulling something out of A Clockwork Orange to condition straight sex into being treated as negative stimuli. 

- Anti truth ( Anti science )

We're seeing that from all sides right now, and I'd say it's more symptomatic of how availably the internet makes alternative facts searchable. 

Dove said: 

You shouldn't be a scientist cause science cannot be makebelief.

It is Science that is granting hormone replacement therapy to the public. 

Shut the fuck up. What's anti science is Legga argument he's a biological woman.

Pretty sure there isn't a form you can file to have your biological sex retroactively changed, at most she could change her gender. Leggasus is pulling your leg with that one. 

I work with text to speech often enough, and I recognize it when I hear it. Try giving your text to speech character.

Liars lie.

I recall back then asking if your ex wife had blue hair and piercings, cause you're so woke I wondered what kind of woman would keep you. She learned the hard way cause now you outdone yourself.

Dove said: 

I recall back then asking if your ex wife had blue hair and piercings, cause you're so woke I wondered what kind of woman would keep you. She learned the hard way cause now you outdone yourself.

In the meantime, your (ex?) girlfriend is cucking you to the point that you feel the need to announce here that the cuck is the strongest man to avoid having your ego shattered or having to break up with your girlfriend. Your girlfriends, according to you, are with you for your money.

I don't think you should lecture me about my relationships.

AppleGenius said: 

Dove said: 

I recall back then asking if your ex wife had blue hair and piercings, cause you're so woke I wondered what kind of woman would keep you. She learned the hard way cause now you outdone yourself.

In the meantime, your (ex?) girlfriend is cucking you to the point that you feel the need to announce here that the cuck is the strongest man to avoid having your ego shattered or having to break up with your girlfriend. Your girlfriends, according to you, are with you for your money.

I don't think you should lecture me about my relationships.

 Lol 

I've never been cucked in my life. And I don't recall lecturing you about relationships. 

I'm simply prepared to be cheated on, and I'm prepared to lose.

In my opinion your ex wife could take a page from my book so she won't lose any sleep when you file for divorce cause you turned gay for a minute.

My mental health is in my hands. Lol that's why I agree with Top G.