Sociopath Community

You're both slave to your egos. Neither of you appear interested in discussion, just 'winning' and performing for the 'audience' which makes this place a bit of a bore, tbh. One-up-man-ship and weasel word twisting as an attempt to validate a self-perception of superior intelligence. Tc nitpicks, judges and assumes motivations without seeking to know and understand, while Applegenius stumbles around trying to score 'gotchas' autistically focusing on semantics, thinking himself oh so clever while never seeming to form any connections here. Fascinating. 

Med said: 

I’d like to challenge you that the reverse of your statement is true, what you are calling “binary logic”. I had a short crash course in formal logic for the lsat, and given consideration to the sufficient statement (the if X statement) and the necessary statement (the then Y statement), the reverse is not true. The logic flows only one way from sufficient to necessary. This is calling on what little I remember.

You're right about what you say, but I think you misread what I wrote. I'm not claiming that X->Y implies that Y->X, or that the reverse of X->Y  must be true if X->Y is true. Only X->Y is implied.

The statement is: If X is true, then Y is true. I.e., assume that X=true implies Y=true.

The next proposition is: Is Y true, if X is true? The proposition assumes that X is true. Therefore, another way to state the position is: "Does X=true imply that Y=true?"

It does, tautologically, if X=true implies that Y=true.

Theox said: 

You're both slave to your egos. Neither of you appear interested in discussion, just 'winning' and performing for the 'audience' which makes this place a bit of a bore, tbh. One-up-man-ship and weasel word twisting as an attempt to validate a self-perception of superior intelligence. Tc nitpicks, judges and assumes motivations without seeking to know and understand, while Applegenius stumbles around trying to score 'gotchas' autistically focusing on semantics, thinking himself oh so clever while never seeming to form any connections here. Fascinating. 

Well, setting the performance aside, I'm quite angry at Turncoat for being such a little bitch and for pretending to be my friend. I really want him to eat glass and die a death fitting to someone like him, shitting blood on a hospital bed, surrounded by nobody. I defended him for so long and bought into his bullshit, while he manipulated me like a dog to do his bidding and then started attacking me and my wife when his interests weren't served anymore. You have no clue how disgraceful and selfish a person TC is and how far he's willing to take things for the sake of a few peanuts and laughs. You know that I lent him money, right?

AppleGenius said: 

Well, setting the performance aside, I'm quite angry at Turncoat for being such a little bitch and for pretending to be my friend. I really want him to eat glass and die a death fitting to someone like him, shitting blood on a hospital bed, surrounded by nobody. I defended him for so long and bought into his bullshit, while he manipulated me like a dog to do his bidding and then started attacking me and my wife when his interests weren't served anymore. You have no clue how disgraceful and selfish a person TC is and how far he's willing to take things for the sake of a few peanuts and laughs. You know that I lent him money, right?

 I didn't know...  How much did you lend?  Were you paid back?

Buttered Toast said: 

How much did you lend? 

898.9 USD

Were you paid back?

No. But then again I said this:

04:14 Legga: Ok I made the transfer, sugarpups. If you can't pay back, don't worry about it.
04:16 Turncoat: omg! thanks!!

And then the hoe ran with my money. Can you imagine?