Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

It's more that I tend to disagree with the majority of what you say, as would many the layman if confronted with the same information. 

AppleGenius said: 

Turncoat said: 

It's more that I tend to disagree with the majority of what you say, as would many the layman if confronted with the same information. 

It's more that you tend to disagree with everything anyone says once you've made up your mind that you want to disagree with them. 

So you agree with Turquie's premises on religion and love? 

Turncoat said: 

AppleGenius said: 

Turncoat said: 

It's more that I tend to disagree with the majority of what you say, as would many the layman if confronted with the same information. 

It's more that you tend to disagree with everything anyone says once you've made up your mind that you want to disagree with them. 

So you agree with Turquie's premises on religion and love?

Depends on what they are. I wouldn't evaluate them based on who says it, and there are certainly some statements that Turquie has made in the past that I agree with. I don't disagree with everything she says, if that's what you're getting at.

AppleGenius said: 

Turncoat said: 

AppleGenius said: 

Turncoat said: 

It's more that I tend to disagree with the majority of what you say, as would many the layman if confronted with the same information. 

It's more that you tend to disagree with everything anyone says once you've made up your mind that you want to disagree with them. 

So you agree with Turquie's premises on religion and love?

Depends on what they are.

I don't see how you could miss it when she's like half of the front page most days. 

As long as you continue to be ignorant of Turquie's content, we have nothing to discuss in this topic really. 

Turncoat said: 

I don't see how you could miss it when she's like half of the front page most days. 

I'm more busy than you are.

AppleGenius said: 

Turncoat said: 

I don't see how you could miss it when she's like half of the front page most days. 

I'm more busy than you are.

You're on here more than often enough to notice her content, but if you don't even know the material then you are wasting my time. 

Turncoat said: 

You're on here more than often enough to notice her content, but if you don't even know the material then you are wasting my time.

Your time isn't that valuable, lol, no offense.

AppleGenius said: 

Turncoat said: 

You're on here more than often enough to notice her content, but if you don't even know the material then you are wasting my time.

Your time isn't that valuable lol.

Noted. 

JesusistheKing said: 

he is the one being ignored now that I got out everything that I wanted to say,  I personally do not care if he reads it either way what feels good is to vent and release onto him  his reaction to it does not matter to me lol

Until he blocks you anyway, which is part of why this is unusual. 

You've at this point admitted to having multiple accounts hit this way over doing this, and if blocked again you'll just make yet another account. 

AppleGenius said: 

Turncoat said: 

It's more that I tend to disagree with the majority of what you say, as would many the layman if confronted with the same information. 

It's more that you tend to disagree with everything anyone says once you've made up your mind that you want to disagree with them. After that, it's like talking to a brick wall, because you mostly care about the process of annoying people as opposed to getting to something approximating the truth. I mean, there are times you've even gotten to the point of rejecting binary logic just because you are horrified by the thought of having to admit you're wrong. She's not the only one who has pointed this out.

 

Here is you refusing to acknowledge binary logic:

If you’re an engineer or a chemist I am wrong.

Suppose he says he's wrong, if I am a chemist or an engineer. Does it mean that he's wrong, if I am a chemist or an engineer?

Turncoat said:

All he really said is 'science is hard', arguably by the words alone this even leaves fields like medical open to interpretation.

But he didn't say science is hard. He said he is wrong if I am an engineer or a chemist.

Turncoat said:

Do you only go by what is said, or by what is meant?

Do you think your saying you're one of those two jobs has him now suddenly humbled to the point of thinking you his superior?

I only think that he is wrong if I am an engineer or a chemist, going by what he said.

Turncoat said:

Isn't the point of these debates to try to appeal towards your opponent and the surrounding audience? If you just sit there being like "Well, by the words he said I get to feel like I'm right", then why even reach out in relation to your opponents in the first place when you could just smuggly pat yourself on the back?

But he literally just said he's wrong if :

If you’re an engineer or a chemist I am wrong.

Turncoat said:

He's not a computer.

Suppose he says he's wrong, if I am a chemist or an engineer. Does it mean that he's wrong, if I am a chemist or an engineer?

Turncoat said:

We can't prove if you are or aren't one of those things is the problem, which could just as easily make your answers as if it were the case a cowardly dodge, a lie of convenience. As such, in your shoes I'd be seeing the real victory be present from winning the argument regardless of what your job is, in lieu of you doing something stupid like presenting us your IRL qualifications.

So you don't think that he is wrong if I am an engineer or a chemist, despite that he says this:

If you’re an engineer or a chemist I am wrong.

?

The answer to the question: "If X is true, then Y is true. Therefore, is Y true, if X is true?" is yes. It's binary logic.

 
 I’d like to challenge you that the reverse of your statement is true, what you are calling “binary logic”. I had a short crash course in formal logic for the lsat, and given consideration to the sufficient statement (the if X statement) and the necessary statement (the then Y statement), the reverse is not true. The logic flows only one way from sufficient to necessary. This is calling on what little I remember.