Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Blue_Jay said: 

Turncoat said: 

Blue_Jay said: 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

LiYang said: 

Leave it to a drug addict to trade his country's freedom for drugs, sad.

This is exactly what they want, you on drugs, weak and beholden to their medical tyranny.

 Cannabis is a medicine with positive effects, not a drug.

While I agree its helpful for people, it's also a plant you burn to get intoxicated. 

The effects it has on areas like motivation aren't super promising either,

Untrue.

We were painting a friend's house once and later on we decided to break for the day.

While reclined buddy whips out a blunt, so we pass it around. Next thing you know we're at it again. I was painting with Joy and I've noticed I've become really skilled with a paint roller.

I'm doing the wall by the stairs and my boy is coming through with a brush doing the lower wall by the stairs, I legit felt proud as my arms were numb from being in held up too long. We ended up finishing the job that night.

Whatever you set your mind on while baked is well done, whether it's hard labor, or creative activities it's done with finesse. If you're an ass that too will be done with finesse.

That's the short term effects of it, I'm referring to people who use it every day. It also depends on how that batch was cultivated for said short term effects, but chronic use is another story. 

Denied. 

I know people who do it daily. Personally I can't. Sometimes it scares me, especially when I think about my vitals. 

What fucks people up is alcohol and other drugs.

Do you not understand where the Stoner stereotype even came from? 🤣

Television.

but legalizing it makes sense for trying to pacify populations. 

It was legalized so the government can make billions of dollars, not to pacify us lol. Bruh, we're Canadians. We don't even riot on Black Friday.

According to Delloitt since the 2018 legalization, Canada has made 43.5 billion from cannabis and that's just 12% of the economic flow, which is impressive considering how small our population is.  It created 90,000 jobs too.

Making this legal was smart. Othereise people will do it anyway.

Why couldn't it be both profit and pacification? 

 Why would it be considered pacification ? Were there angry mobs burning down the place and rioting for it, in Canada ?

So goes Canada, so too must the world? 🙄

I don't really know much about Canadian politics, but the effects of the drug are undeniable. Considering how it was big business interests that kept it from legalizing in the first place, that has me inclined to figure that those in power have found a reason that they figure they'd benefit for it's distribution. It always would have turned a profit, so why now? 

 Big business mostly fears hemp. It's too freaking strong.

It has over 5,000 known use cases.

The first production car is the Ford Model T. If you're lucky enough to see one you'll see the body work has no rust. That's because the body works is a material made from hemp that's stronger and lighter than steel. And doesn't rust.

It goes agsinst corporate interests to sell things that don't seem to break. Hemp concrete is superior for building a house foundation on too. It won't crack or leak.

We also could've produced biofuel with hemp.

I shit you not, we can build rockets and go to the moon and beyond with hemp. It can build a cleaner sustainable future. 

Corporation wants to sell disposable items.

As for hemp's resident cannabis, it makes us think deeply about everything. Governments don't like it when the masses are free thinkers. Despite alchol and tabacco killing people, it made more sense to market that instead of materials and goods that's more sustainable and drives us to be more independent with less problems.

Why now ?

People know about cannabis these days and it cannot be ignored. Justin is also young at heart, hence his maturity level. Not like he's the first to let it rip.

In the Philippines, they'll execute anyone who possess it. Such progress.

Blue_Jay said: 

LiYang said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

LiYang said: 

Leave it to a drug addict to trade his country's freedom for drugs, sad.

This is exactly what they want, you on drugs, weak and beholden to their medical tyranny.

 Cannabis is a medicine with positive effects, not a drug.

The reasons why it was made illegal would shock you.

.

It's also still better to live in Canada than the US.

You're not getting it.

Your drug faction should be able to exist without medical tyranny.

Define medical tyranny ?

See where I live, any ass on the street, ( if they're legal) could get brain surgery, and if it can't be done here, we'll be flown anywhere in the world to get it. 

We have no idea what co-pay is, we're not afraid of illness destroying our nests or bringing us to poverty.

Also. Voting is multiple-choice. I voted agsinst Trudeau once already and last time I had no one so I never voted at all. Every nation needs a Trump, but that only happens once in a dozen lifetimes.

 

True free countries allow peaceful factions to exist within.

That's what we doing. We're making Space cookies in peace damnit. What else should I have ?

 

Don't vote in some tyrant dangling a carrot of drugs. Vote in freedom to have the local laws in your faction not bound by Government. The power is in the people.

 Easier said than done.

The thing about this, people love to hate. When it comes to Trudeau, he's always been hated for his insufferable virtue signaling, and endless apologetic whinning toward the natives. BLM or whatever crap comes out of the US he's all about in an effort to stay in power.

He used to enjoy life, but the world has gone bitter and everyone's past is a threat. Justin has his head in the clouds and sheds tears when the world tells him he's offensive. He really lacks balls, and even the Saudi's are on the verge of bullying Canada cause Trudeau had to comment on how women are treated over there right after the Prince took a step and let women drive over there.

I'm all for people having the right to peacefully protest, but get the fuck off the road. I always hated that shit, especially when the crowd does it. Sadly Trudeau thought he was doing the right thing, even though the health minister made it clear how we needs to know the risks when getting vaccinated.

I'm also a communist at heart. Democracy is only good while we don't have our way. Everyone is a communist tbh.

One part of medical tyranny is not being able to get access to a needed drug. Or having drugs forced or coerced on to your body.

If you can't vote in a drug locally with your own representatives you are living under medical tyranny.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/3261642-tennessee-senate-passes-bill-to-allow-over-the-counter-sales-of-ivermectin/

"NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WJHL) – A local lawmaker has co-sponsored a bill that would allow ivermectin to be sold over the counter in Tennessee without a prescription. On Wednesday, the bill co-sponsored by Sen. Rusty Crowe (R-Johnson City) was passed by the state Senate.

Senate Bill 2188 was introduced by Sen. Frank Niceley (R-Strawberry Plains) on Jan. 31. Crowe became one of the bill’s co-sponsors as it made its way past committees in the Senate. It passed in the Senate with a vote of 23-6."

Blue_Jay said: 

Why now ?

People know about cannabis these days and it cannot be ignored.

It could have very well been, people liked weed arguably just as much before. What was keeping it from public consumption was a big business decision, and it would have always turned a profit, so it's worth wondering what really changed that made it suddenly permissible. 

Come on now, this isn't a "Will of the People" situation like Prohibition was, this is them giving people permission to smoke and it's likely over a larger reason that has not been disclosed. Canada at least took to it a few years after the legalizing trend hit the US, so it's easy enough to presume they are merely imitating their neighbor, but why would the US choose the 2012 to 2016 range to try to reintroduce it rather than any earlier? 

Blue_Jay said: 

Turncoat said: 

Blue_Jay said: 

Turncoat said: 

That's the short term effects of it, I'm referring to people who use it every day. It also depends on how that batch was cultivated for said short term effects, but chronic use is another story. 

Denied. 

I know people who do it daily. Personally I can't. Sometimes it scares me, especially when I think about my vitals. 

What fucks people up is alcohol and other drugs.

Do you not understand where the Stoner stereotype even came from? 🤣

Television.

So you think there's no reality to the origin of Stoner behavior..? Do you not often encounter them or something? 

Next you'll tell me alcohol doesn't make people drunk. 

 

Why couldn't it be both profit and pacification? 

 Why would it be considered pacification ? Were there angry mobs burning down the place and rioting for it, in Canada ?

So goes Canada, so too must the world? 🙄

I don't really know much about Canadian politics, but the effects of the drug are undeniable. Considering how it was big business interests that kept it from legalizing in the first place, that has me inclined to figure that those in power have found a reason that they figure they'd benefit for it's distribution. It always would have turned a profit, so why now? 

Big business mostly fears hemp. It's too freaking strong.

It has over 5,000 known use cases.

If you think that's the only reason, then you aren't looking hard enough imo. 

All they would have had to do is prohibit it with a smear campaign like how the Electric Car was handled here in the 2000s, so I am inclined to think with such an impressionable crowd who was already second guessing the substance that there's more than just that going on. 

It goes agsinst corporate interests to sell things that don't seem to break.

This has been shown with things like the Light Bulb, that it's designer obsolescence was done on purpose: 



Either way, I fully believe that they could make Hemp into a worse material to continue the market, and that calling that the reason plainly by itself for why it was banned does not explain why it was then reintegrated into the market later. By comparison, we still do not have light bulbs that never burn out readily available to the public. 

As for hemp's resident cannabis, it makes us think deeply about everything.

"Do I want these chips... or an ice cream sandwich?"

 /hours pass

"Man, like, Brave Little Toaster is, like, actually a really deep film you guys."

Governments don't like it when the masses are free thinkers.

Marijuana does not suddenly craft free thinkers, it just as a drug has them jettison through their stored up passion until it's depleted. 

Much like LSD, if you take it all the time it doesn't continue to do the same things anymore. 

Despite alchol and tabacco killing people, it made more sense to market that instead of materials and goods that's more sustainable and drives us to be more independent with less problems.

You still have not rationalized what then allowed it to hit the markets later, simply the stories as to why they were not allowed once before. 

Something happened to change that. 

LiYang said: 

Leave it to a drug addict to trade his country's freedom for drugs, sad.

This is exactly what they want, you on drugs, weak and beholden to their medical tyranny.

 

 

 Smh. Silly boy.

You're still not getting it.

WE DON'T PAY FOR HEALTH CARE. IT'S ALL 100% FREE.

That includes a good percentage of our medicines, depending on our income level.

Mine is free. 100% free. My sister makes $40k and her meds are 80% covered.

And FOR THE TENTH TIME

WE DON'T HAVE TO GET VACCINATED ANYMORE.

NOT TO TRAVEL, NOT TO GO TO SCHOOL, NOTHING.

The only people who still have to get vaccinated are healthcare workers.

Period.

Xena said: 

LiYang said: 

Leave it to a drug addict to trade his country's freedom for drugs, sad.

This is exactly what they want, you on drugs, weak and beholden to their medical tyranny.

 

 

 Smh. Silly boy.

You're still not getting it.

 

WE DON'T PAY FOR HEALTH CARE. IT'S ALL 100% FREE.

That includes a good percentage of our medicines, depending on our income level.

Mine is free. 100% free. My sister makes $40k and her meds are 80% covered.

 

And FOR THE TENTH TIME

WE DON'T HAVE TO GET VACCINATED ANYMORE.

NOT TO TRAVEL, NOT TO GO TO SCHOOL, NOTHING.

The only people who still have to get vaccinated are healthcare workers.

Period.

 

 

 I am happy you don't have to get vaccinated. ANYMORE. lol That was a close call, needles were out. CCP style.

I never mentioned money, free means nothing when you can't actually get the medicine you need. Can you get ivermectin for covid? Or do you have a tyrannical State that does not allow?

Why does Trudeau look so sick? Something is not right.

Turncoat said: 

Blue_Jay said: 

Why now ?

People know about cannabis these days and it cannot be ignored.

It could have very well been, people liked weed arguably just as much before.

That isn't the point though, and it matters not that people liked it before. We're more knowledgeable about cannabis and less programmed by the propaganda that denounces what it really is.

What was keeping it from public consumption was a big business decision, and it would have always turned a profit, so it's worth wondering what really changed that made it suddenly permissible. 

You're basically repeating what I said.

Come on now, this isn't a "Will of the People" situation like Prohibition was, this is them giving people permission to smoke and it's likely over a larger reason that has not been disclosed.

It's simply so the Canadian government can make more money. On that note, if the people weren't willing then there would be no reason to legalize it. You can argue it isn't the will of the people, though the consumers, the people, got what they wanted.

Blue_Jay said: 

Turncoat said: 

Blue_Jay said: 

Why now ?

People know about cannabis these days and it cannot be ignored.

It could have very well been, people liked weed arguably just as much before.

That isn't the point though, and it matters not that people liked it before. We're more knowledgeable about cannabis and less programmed by the propaganda that denounces what it really is.

That only happened because of interests bigger than us making that happen. 

I'm curious as to why then, rather than earlier or later. 

What was keeping it from public consumption was a big business decision, and it would have always turned a profit, so it's worth wondering what really changed that made it suddenly permissible. 

You're basically repeating what I said.

Not really, you seem to think everything is going as normal as opposed to it being a symptom of some other agenda. 

Come on now, this isn't a "Will of the People" situation like Prohibition was, this is them giving people permission to smoke and it's likely over a larger reason that has not been disclosed.

It's simply so the Canadian government can make more money.

That would have made them money earlier than when it was implimented, yet you seem content to not ask questions. 

The pacification must be working. 

On that note, if the people weren't willing then there would be no reason to legalize it. You can argue it isn't the will of the people, though the consumers, the people, got what they wanted.

The majority don't even smoke the stuff, and a lot choose not to even with legalization. 

Turncoat said: 

Blue_Jay said: 

Turncoat said: 

Blue_Jay said: 

Turncoat said: 

That's the short term effects of it, I'm referring to people who use it every day. It also depends on how that batch was cultivated for said short term effects, but chronic use is another story. 

Denied. 

I know people who do it daily. Personally I can't. Sometimes it scares me, especially when I think about my vitals. 

What fucks people up is alcohol and other drugs.

Do you not understand where the Stoner stereotype even came from? 🤣

Television.

So you think there's no reality to the origin of Stoner behavior..? Do you not often encounter them or something? 

You asked where the stoner stereotype came from. It was sparked with the 1930's film Reefer Madness, when the economy was switching the inferior products which are more profitable for corporations.

Earlier I mentioned even an ass will do so with finesse. You seem to insinuate a pot smoker will by default act like a loser with no potential to make anything of themselves. 

Next you'll tell me alcohol doesn't make people drunk. 

What I'll tell you next is you've repeated my points here and are now you're inventing excuses to cast ridicule.

When I say you're dim I'm not out to cast insults, I'm being literal.

Why couldn't it be both profit and pacification? 

 Why would it be considered pacification ? Were there angry mobs burning down the place and rioting for it, in Canada ?

So goes Canada, so too must the world? 🙄

I don't really know much about Canadian politics, but the effects of the drug are undeniable. Considering how it was big business interests that kept it from legalizing in the first place, that has me inclined to figure that those in power have found a reason that they figure they'd benefit for it's distribution. It always would have turned a profit, so why now? 

Big business mostly fears hemp. It's too freaking strong.

It has over 5,000 known use cases.

If you think that's the only reason, then you aren't looking hard enough imo. 

I said big business mostly fears hemp.

All they would have had to do is prohibit it with a smear campaign like how the Electric Car was handled here in the 2000s, so I am inclined to think with such an impressionable crowd who was already second guessing the substance that there's more than just that going on. 

The Ford EV1 wasn't prohibited with a smear campaign. It was recalled and destroyed without any explanation. Cannabis already went through that, and quite frankly it was a huge step backward.

A worse material than what ? Gasoline ? Cotton ? What material ?

Hemp is the greatest resource of all. Using it as fuel wouldn't have poisioned the air either.

That would describe someone with low intelligence being high and trying to make the most of snacking and watching children's programming.

In my case I create masterpieces under a different clarity.

It most definitely opens the mind, and whatever we're doing, including thinking, is amplified.

False. I first smoked pot when I was 14 years old. At 44 it has the same effect, the modern strands are even more powerful than ever. When I smoke it, I still roll half a pinners and smoke half and I'm good.