Sociopath Community

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Evidence if presented without context means nothing. 

 That hasn't been the case with any of our subjects here.

Howso? 

lol at this point to claim there's a lack of context is laughable. 

It would be a waste of time to assist you.

I was only responding to this point: 

Maninist said:

For some, evidence just isn't enough. Maybe one day evidence won't hold any weight in a court of law.

I'm glad you agree you need more than just evidence alone. 

 You'd find sarcasm agreeable. Off into delusion you go.

So you really think evidence doesn't need context? 

You just appealed to context being in this topic though. 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Evidence if presented without context means nothing. 

 That hasn't been the case with any of our subjects here.

Howso? 

lol at this point to claim there's a lack of context is laughable. 

It would be a waste of time to assist you.

I was only responding to this point: 

Maninist said:

For some, evidence just isn't enough. Maybe one day evidence won't hold any weight in a court of law.

I'm glad you agree you need more than just evidence alone. 

 You'd find sarcasm agreeable. Off into delusion you go.

So you really think evidence doesn't need context? 

I don't recall saying there is evidence without context.

You just appealed to context being in this topic though. 

 I'll repeat. You'd find sarcasm agreeable. Deluded you go. And as usual, pointless. 

Maninist said:

I don't recall saying there is evidence without context.

Then you admit to agreeing to transsexual logic? 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said:

I don't recall saying there is evidence without context.

Then you admit to agreeing to transsexual logic? 

 Transsexual logic is make belief. 

'Make belief' that you've over the course of a page agreed with by your own terminology. 

Checkmate. 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Evidence if presented without context means nothing. 

 That hasn't been the case with any of our subjects here.

I would like to point out that nobody thus far has claimed that evidence holds no weight, either.

For some, evidence just isn't enough. Maybe one day evidence won't hold any weight in a court of law.

I would rather say that, for some, insufficient evidence is insufficient, while sufficient evidence is sufficient. This has been the case in court of law thus far. Like how we weight witness testimonies differently from hard evidence like dna samples from a crime scene. There are some who claim evidence holds no weight, as a blanket statement, but this is an extreme minority.

If you're spouse is kinda broken, fellas, record the encounters.