I mostly see you trying to justify your stance by presuming that I must be brainwashed.
I mostly just see you making excuses and trying to justify shit.
Should we resume this talk another time?
No because I already know how you're going to respond. There's no point in talking to you at all because you'll only be like "well from my perspective" instead of addressing what people are saying
I don't see how I'm supposed to account for that which I was not there for, especially when what I've been there for otherwise provides an explanation.
When there's been a pattern of misconceptions where even Inquirer's had to correct MC before over it when we "Oh really"-ed over it, or even just seeing how the rumor mill twists and turns on the forum here, it'd need to be a bit more than "She said I sent peanuts to Fae and warned two people about me".
I don't see how I'm supposed to account for that which I was not there for, especially when what I've been there for otherwise provides an explanation.
When there's been a pattern of misconceptions where even Inquirer's had to correct MC before over it when we "Oh really"-ed over it, or even just seeing how the rumor mill twists and turns on the forum here, it'd need to be a bit more than "She said I sent peanuts to Fae and warned two people about me".
She literally lied but okay dude
I don't see how I'm supposed to account for that which I was not there for, especially when what I've been there for otherwise provides an explanation.
When there's been a pattern of misconceptions where even Inquirer's had to correct MC before over it when we "Oh really"-ed over it, or even just seeing how the rumor mill twists and turns on the forum here, it'd need to be a bit more than "She said I sent peanuts to Fae and warned two people about me".She literally lied but okay dude
About which, the peanuts?
I don't see how I'm supposed to account for that which I was not there for, especially when what I've been there for otherwise provides an explanation.
When there's been a pattern of misconceptions where even Inquirer's had to correct MC before over it when we "Oh really"-ed over it, or even just seeing how the rumor mill twists and turns on the forum here, it'd need to be a bit more than "She said I sent peanuts to Fae and warned two people about me".She literally lied but okay dude
About which, the peanuts?
Her telling Inq she(and you because apparently she speaks for you) thought it was me that sent the peanuts (recently nov.2020) when you both knew i hadn't. She lied about me calling her family and lied about me doxing her.
I get that you don't actually give a fuck tho even if other people say she did a thing you will try to spin it in any direction you can to fit with your belief.
Is there much point in arguing with you about it? Not really.
I don't see how I'm supposed to account for that which I was not there for, especially when what I've been there for otherwise provides an explanation.
When there's been a pattern of misconceptions where even Inquirer's had to correct MC before over it when we "Oh really"-ed over it, or even just seeing how the rumor mill twists and turns on the forum here, it'd need to be a bit more than "She said I sent peanuts to Fae and warned two people about me".She literally lied but okay dude
About which, the peanuts?
Her telling Inq she(and you because apparently she speaks for you) thought it was me that sent the peanuts (recently nov.2020) when you both knew i hadn't.
Without being able to see that for myself I have nothing to go on. With her and I's talks about it the peanuts were presumed to be over another.
She lied about me calling her family and lied about me doxing her.
As far as I know it's just been subtle threats based on your research, more of a potential to do it than having actually done it with reason to avoid people being over the room to post it in response.
I get that you don't actually give a fuck tho even if other people say she did a thing you will try to spin it in any direction you can to fit with your belief.
I do care, but so far those trying to sell the case keep trying to couch it as a faith statement rather than trying to prove it.
So far, save for a few cases, each past case has been a misconception where time granted it room to clear up, and I think you're asking me to make a big conclusion off of very little.
Is there much point in arguing with you about it? Not really.
If your means of arguing is to think it is impossible if they don't just take you on your word alone, then yeah, not really much point.
I can only argue from my own point of view, and from what I've seen it's appeared otherwise. Even before now it's been easy to see weird unprecedented claims appear on the forum here that were cleared up overtime, and with that model in place it's hard to not see this as more of the same without more to go on.
Her being mostly gone from this place for years seems to have done some nutty things to her reputation, so much of her's like a ghost narrative on here now with tons of maybe's and questions. She's even been mixed up for other older users in discussions here without interruption.
Made a thread about her suicidal BF while flirting with another dude
Other than some self-deprecation over how I was in general at that timeframe and mentioning that she'd been drinking with her snark-flirts being directed at Jim, I've got nothing.
It was pretty shitty, but by the time we'd discussed it and made up over it the forum was locked on the stuff pre-that. Since then this is brought up as the common example of her misdeeds or whatever, which doesn't really resonate much on it's own and has otherwise lost impact over the years through sheer repetition.
If this kept happening, that would have been another story.
