Well my point is that the time on my end was spent over suspecting another, having me wonder if you or he are mistaken if not a conversation I was not privy to over it having taken place.
The talks on my end were not over suspecting her over that stuff, merely over what her potential is based on past actions.
Lmao
Thinks i sent her peanuts
It wasn't you.
I know it wasn't me, it's the fact that she's made others believe it was me.
I think Fae was mistaken over what I'd guess was Crow not saying the name of who did it, then her presuming it must have been you.
Why would Fae guess me out of the blue TC, think a little.
In response to how she was already mad at you over unrelated things, you're asking me to use Fae as a credible enough witness to finger Crow out for lying about you.
Come on now, this one's a reach. Knowing the peanuts story itself and who it did involve I see no reason for Crow to claim you did it.I'm so upset that i cannot post screenshots of this conversation but you are literally wrong.
So you're telling me that Crow's gone out of her way to sell to Fae that you were the one who sent the peanuts?
I'm saying she went out of her way to tell someone other than Fae.
Who'd she go out of her way to try to convince that you sent her peanuts?
I can't post screenshots but it's more or less recent,
As for above, fuck you for being such a coward.
idk but Inq told me someone sent stuff to her house, called her parents, made fake bios and comments in her name.
I know of what you're referring to, but that was not Alena.
What time I spent discussing it with her was over a different suspicion.The point being she told someone other than Fae that she thought i sent her peanuts recently-ish
News to me, she and I never spoke as if it were the case, and when Fae brought it up we went with it being Fae mixing things up. As things are now I don't really see a motivation, smart or oversighted, to say it was you rather than either saying the person more likely involved with it or neglecting to say a name at all.
A lot of these situations keep sounding like the third to fourth degree of separation from the source are the ones left to report 'the facts', and so far each of those when led to their rightful conclusion has come out more reasonable than the prior presumption. Without more to go on it keeps so far looking like telephone game errors and heresay.
BT and inquirer were both told by crow that she was being harassed by certain people turns out it's a blatant lie but you still try to defend it
Did she say who?
Thinks i sent her peanuts
It wasn't you.
I know it wasn't me, it's the fact that she's made others believe it was me.
I think Fae was mistaken over what I'd guess was Crow not saying the name of who did it, then her presuming it must have been you.
Why would Fae guess me out of the blue TC, think a little.
In response to how she was already mad at you over unrelated things, you're asking me to use Fae as a credible enough witness to finger Crow out for lying about you.
Come on now, this one's a reach. Knowing the peanuts story itself and who it did involve I see no reason for Crow to claim you did it.I'm so upset that i cannot post screenshots of this conversation but you are literally wrong.
So you're telling me that Crow's gone out of her way to sell to Fae that you were the one who sent the peanuts?
I'm saying she went out of her way to tell someone other than Fae.
Who'd she go out of her way to try to convince that you sent her peanuts?
I can't post screenshots but it's more or less recent,
As for above, fuck you for being such a coward.
idk but Inq told me someone sent stuff to her house, called her parents, made fake bios and comments in her name.
I know of what you're referring to, but that was not Alena.
What time I spent discussing it with her was over a different suspicion.The point being she told someone other than Fae that she thought i sent her peanuts recently-ish
News to me, she and I never spoke as if it were the case, and when Fae brought it up we went with it being Fae mixing things up. As things are now I don't really see a motivation, smart or oversighted, to say it was you rather than either saying the person more likely involved with it or neglecting to say a name at all.
A lot of these situations keep sounding like the third to fourth degree of separation from the source are the ones left to report 'the facts', and so far each of those when led to their rightful conclusion has come out more reasonable than the prior presumption. Without more to go on it keeps so far looking like telephone game errors and heresay.
You're such a spineless coward, I literally feel so bad that you don't even recognize what you're doing
I can think of people who have harassed her is the thing, and examples where people did some shitty things in relation to her, but my defense in this topic in particular are over the specific accusations being brought up.
Out of those, unless we throw in more things to talk about, the only one left with room to discuss it is the peanuts.
I mostly see you trying to justify your stance by presuming that I must be brainwashed.
I mostly just see you making excuses and trying to justify shit.
I can think of people who have harassed her is the thing, and examples where people did some shitty things in relation to her, but my defense in this topic in particular are over the specific accusations being brought up.
Out of those, unless we throw in more things to talk about, the only one left with room to discuss it is the peanuts.
Literally very pathetic
