Sociopath Community

Blue_Jay said: 

I looked into what you did not Emily.

You'll be at high risk of getting something called Brucellosis if you have intercourse with a dog.

On a side note my ex roommate who I'm a friend of his family is a homosexual, and he had a dog he named Bruce. ( I'm not making this up). Funny thing he would go to bed at 10PM, and he'd call Bruce for Bedtime, but Bruce never wanted to go, he wanted to stay with me instead. Roommate had to come and drag him to his room then he shut the door. That was the regular routine. To top it off he's round and has a small penis ( I once saw a picture of his penis for accident, it was a tiny round thing with a head ) and he isn't very attractive ( repulsive if you ask me) and is single and really fruity. So who knows what he did with Bruce while knowing the potential of getting Brucellosis.

.

Without reading the whole damn book on it I gather..

People with brucellosis may develop fever, sweats, headaches, back pains, and physical weakness. In severe cases, the central nervous system and the lining of the heart may be affected. One form of the illness may also cause long-lasting symptoms, including recurrent fevers, joint pain, and fatigue.

 On rare cases it is fatal, and only 100-200 cases are reported a year... Of course if someone got ill from banging their poodle they may not want that one on their record, or maybe they just obtain the antibiotic.

Biblically speaking, it's been written if someone lies with an animal they will be put to death, and by that they mean beastiality.

Also. Don't let God's forgiveness incentivise you to sin. He's far from stupid and he'll judge you accordingly. 

additionally, do you know how many other sins God had given the "death penalty" on in the Old Testament ?  umm,  let's see  rape,  being rebellious against your parents  and so on  have you ever been rebellious against your parents Spatial ?  :p  https://www.gotquestions.org/death-penalty.html

The Old Testament law commanded the death penalty for various acts: murder (Exodus 21:12), kidnapping (Exodus 21:16), bestiality (Exodus 22:19), adultery (Leviticus 20:10), homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), being a false prophet (Deuteronomy 13:5), prostitution and rape (Deuteronomy 22:24), and several other crimes. However, God often showed mercy when the death penalty was due. David committed adultery and murder, yet God did not demand his life be taken (2 Samuel 11:1-5, 14-17; 2 Samuel 12:13). Ultimately, every sin we commit should result in the death penalty because the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23). Thankfully, God demonstrates His love for us in not condemning us (Romans 5:8).

When the Pharisees brought a woman who was caught in the act of adultery to Jesus and asked Him if she should be stoned, Jesus replied, “If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her” (John 8:7). This should not be used to indicate that Jesus rejected capital punishment in all instances. Jesus was simply exposing the hypocrisy of the Pharisees. The Pharisees wanted to trick Jesus into breaking the Old Testament law; they did not truly care about the woman being stoned (where was the man who was caught in adultery?) God is the One who instituted capital punishment: “Whoever sheds man’s blood, by man his blood shall be shed, for in the image of God He made man” (Genesis 9:6). Jesus would support capital punishment in some instances. Jesus also demonstrated grace when capital punishment was due (John 8:1-11). The apostle Paul definitely recognized the power of the government to institute capital punishment where appropriate (Romans 13:1-7).

How should a Christian view the death penalty? First, we must remember that God has instituted capital punishment in His Word; therefore, it would be presumptuous of us to think that we could institute a higher standard. God has the highest standard of any being; He is perfect. This standard applies not only to us but to Himself. Therefore, He loves to an infinite degree, and He has mercy to an infinite degree. We also see that He has wrath to an infinite degree, and it is all maintained in a perfect balance.

Second, we must recognize that God has given government the authority to determine when capital punishment is due (Genesis 9:6; Romans 13:1-7). It is unbiblical to claim that God opposes the death penalty in all instances. Christians should never rejoice when the death penalty is employed, but at the same time, Christians should not fight against the government’s right to execute the perpetrators of the most evil of crimes.

Tryptamine said: 

don't see how male dogs could be harmed or why they'd feel negative emotions. sometimes people will do things to keep the dog erect; that's probably unpleasant for them. female dogs might find the experience unpleasant if a human penetrates them—there's a large phallus difference (no pun intended)

From an older topic on the same thing: 

JesusistheKing said: 

also as I mentioned in the past I am not really a dog or horse fan,  I mostly love cats and small dogs and puppies  so there is just genuinely no emotional or psychological connection for me

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

don't see how male dogs could be harmed or why they'd feel negative emotions. sometimes people will do things to keep the dog erect; that's probably unpleasant for them. female dogs might find the experience unpleasant if a human penetrates them—there's a large phallus difference (no pun intended)

From an older topic on the same thing: 

JesusistheKing said: 

also as I mentioned in the past I am not really a dog or horse fan,  I mostly love cats and small dogs and puppies  so there is just genuinely no emotional or psychological connection for me

OH,  I meant that I am not sexually interested in cats and small dogs and puppies,  because I love them and see them as "cute"

but that I am sexually aroused by erect big dogs and horses,  and it is because I do not emotionally or psychologically connect with them so there is no drama or stress and I can just indulge myself

I should be careful about how I word some of this stuff lol  because some people like having sexual intercourse with people they consider cute and that they love in that innocent vanilla type of way  (which I have personally never experienced)

I think that I can let go into some super deep nasty primal orgasm stuff a little more with a dog licking me than a man,  because I am not concerned with what the dog is thinking of me if that makes sense  :p

but to be honest,  Michael brought out these urges in me as well  they do call him "the beast"............  maybe he is not fully human either Idk  obviously Satan is not fully human too soo  yeah I have a kink  :p

Related topics: 

sometimes I watch dog cumming in women porn no trolling

why would consensual beastiality trigger people more than pedophilia

hating and unforgiveness are sins

confession I humilated myself because I wanted to give Michael power

lol I am giggling uncontrollably bc of telling ppl that I let dogs

Pretty sure this isn't all of them. 

JesusistheKing said: 

Empath said: 

So, the main thing i think most people are thinking about as why this is wrong, is because of the idea that it seems impossible for an animal to give consent because we can't literally ask them.

In your scenario of how a male dog could fuck a human out of its own free will, and i think you are implying that it is consenting in that scenario, one problem with that shows when comparing it to human males.

Sometimes when men are raped, the perpetrator says that he wanted it because he was erect and even ejaculated--therefore he consented--but this is wrong. A physiological response is not consent. Women too often have positive seeming physical responses during rape like being wet and even reaching orgasm, but that has nothing to do with consent or how the experience will psychologically effect the person after. 

I would even go as far to say that if someone took advantage of a man's sex drive, by putting him in a situation to be able to have sex with them when they know he is super horny, even if he would have said no if they asked him before hand, and he has sex with them. I'd say that is a very grey area of consent. Not clear consent.

So that whole scenario with presenting yourself to a horny male dog to let them "choose" to fuck you already is not clear consent at all to me.

 

And that is all before getting into the part where a human and dog cannot be on the same intellectual level. There are things you know that the dog can't know. The dog can't know even if you explain it to them, because they can't talk.

That unequal ground is the same reason that children cannot consent to sex. Even if they say they do. The unequal ground that the two participants stand on makes true consent impossible.

 

 Another example like the one I gave above, would be presenting yourself to a young male child who is aroused, and allowing them to have sex with you. You could say the same thing in that situation, that they have free will. But it breaks consent. 

 

I understand this,  but since dogs are not human,  do you think that it actually traumatizes them ?  I mean,  comparing dogs to a human child-   just because some humans like to think of dogs as their children,  does not in any way shape or form mean that adult male dogs have a similar psychology to children like at all,  In my opinion  humans are just weird and try to personify dogs from my perspective  but....  They're dogs

 

 

 I understand that dogs are not actually equivalent to human children. But one thing that they share is that they are both not on the same intellectual grounds as an adult human, which is what causes the consent issue.

And because we cannot literally ask a dog yes or no, nor do they even understand the question, means they can never give 100% true consent. 

I think that your question is worth asking for the sake of thinking about it though.

Like, with all that I've said, does that mean a mute person cannot consent? They could communicate a yes through writing. But what about a person so disabled they cannot give clear communication through any means. But if they are an adult and have sexual desires, would it be wrong to take aware their freedom to have sex? That seems tricky to me. Because they cannot communicate consent, it would always be in a grey area. Say they had a partner who jacked them off whenever the disabled person was physically aroused, and they never showed signs of discomfort in their face (which they would be able to do in this context). Its just such a grey area.

Reminds me of the story of the woman who i think got arrested because she was jacking off the dolphin who fell in love with her or something?

JesusistheKing said: 

but that I am sexually aroused by erect big dogs and horses,  and it is because I do not emotionally or psychologically conne t with them so there is no drama or stress and I can just indulge myself

^ This is pretty much the message I was trying to get across to him, but yeah I can see how that'd be unclear. 

Tryptamine said: 

don't see how male dogs could be harmed or why they'd feel negative emotions. sometimes people will do things to keep the dog erect; that's probably unpleasant for them. female dogs might find the experience unpleasant if a human penetrates them—there's a large phallus difference (no pun intended)

 I did a search on zoophilia, and aside from a Wikipedia, most of it was porn, so I did an image search, and in most of the images, the animal seemed to be doing all the work. Mostly dogs and some white girl.

It seems like women are into this, while there doesn't seem to be too many cases of men having sex with animals. I haven't seen any in my search but it happens I'm sure. 

From what I gather, female animals seem to be getting raped, no idea what's going through their head, while the male side of their species seems turned on so they go for it. With that, it's most likely animal abuse if a man *shudders* you know.

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

don't see how male dogs could be harmed or why they'd feel negative emotions. sometimes people will do things to keep the dog erect; that's probably unpleasant for them. female dogs might find the experience unpleasant if a human penetrates them—there's a large phallus difference (no pun intended)

From an older topic on the same thing: 

JesusistheKing said: 

also as I mentioned in the past I am not really a dog or horse fan,  I mostly love cats and small dogs and puppies  so there is just genuinely no emotional or psychological connection for me

 

OH,  I meant that I am not sexually interested in cats and small dogs and puppies,  because I love them and see them as "cute"

 

but that I am sexually aroused by erect big dogs and horses,  and it is because I do not emotionally or psychologically connect with them so there is no drama or stress and I can just indulge myself

 

I should be careful about how I word some of this stuff lol  because some people like having sexual intercourse with people they consider cute and that they love in that innocent vanilla type of way  (which I have personally never experienced)

 

I think that I can let go into some super deep nasty primal orgasm stuff a little more with a dog licking me than a man,  because I am not concerned with what the dog is thinking of me if that makes sense  :p

 

but to be honest,  Michael brought out these urges in me as well  they do call him "the beast"............  maybe he is not fully human either Idk  obviously Satan is not fully human too soo  yeah I have a kink  :p

 

 

bump  I elaborated even more to help you out turncoat  :p

This topic threatens to ruin all our search histories...  Maybe some more than others.

While the topic makes me a bit squeamish, it's appreciated that you're asking questions more than trying to project or assert anything about it.  This is a better approach with such a topic.

Psychologically, I can understand the...appeal, maybe.  And while you do claim that forgiveness is for the taking, your behavior was at some points not seemingly interested in that, but more an excuse to indulge.  I think you're starting to explain yourself better here.

You have to still want and ask for forgiveness, right?  It didn't seem like that was part of your thinking.

JesusistheKing said:

 

please forgive me for fornication with and lusting after sexual intercourse with male dogs Jesus  🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊✝️

 

 It appears like you're doing so here.

And other times you seem to regress or get bratty about it.  Not really asking for some sort of break down, but certainly more consistent contrition would show less (what looks like) hypocritical behavior.

I just hope this isn't something to explore continuing to find an excuse or acceptance in doing this kind of thing.  You've done this before.

Blue_Jay said: 

It seems like women are into this, while there doesn't seem to be too many cases of men having sex with animals. I haven't seen any in my search but it happens I'm sure. 

The farm is a... lonely place, both genders do these things. 😬

One of the Darwin Awards was given to a man who hooked up a car battery to a cow heart before sticking his dick into it.