Sociopath Community

the only thing that I can really think of  (unless you are a male forcing yourself into a dog or a female like rubbing and playing with and sucking the dog's penis,  which is potentially animal sexual abuse)  but letting a dog freewill lick you or ejaculate in you   I do not see how that is harmful to yourself or other people except that you might be putting yourself at risk for contracting a disease

but is this not the same risk that we all have to face whenever we have sexual intercourse with another human being too ?

I apologize if I am offending anyone,  but I am confused about why this kink is such a taboo,  more so than other "fornication and sexual intercourse sins"  🤔😕

please forgive me for fornication with and lusting after sexual intercourse with male dogs Jesus  🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊✝️

I'm not even sure where to start with this topic, good god. 

How about... hm. 

Wouldn't fornicating with dogs count as pre-marital sex, or in your case with your marriage to Jesus wouldn't that be you cheating on Him? 

So, the main thing i think most people are thinking about as why this is wrong, is because of the idea that it seems impossible for an animal to give consent because we can't literally ask them.

In your scenario of how a male dog could fuck a human out of its own free will, and i think you are implying that it is consenting in that scenario, one problem with that shows when comparing it to human males.

Sometimes when men are raped, the perpetrator says that he wanted it because he was erect and even ejaculated--therefore he consented--but this is wrong. A physiological response is not consent. Women too often have positive seeming physical responses during rape like being wet and even reaching orgasm, but that has nothing to do with consent or how the experience will psychologically effect the person after. 

I would even go as far to say that if someone took advantage of a man's sex drive, by putting him in a situation to be able to have sex with them when they know he is super horny, even if he would have said no if they asked him before hand, and he has sex with them. I'd say that is a very grey area of consent. Not clear consent.

So that whole scenario with presenting yourself to a horny male dog to let them "choose" to fuck you already is not clear consent at all to me.

And that is all before getting into the part where a human and dog cannot be on the same intellectual level. There are things you know that the dog can't know. The dog can't know even if you explain it to them, because they can't talk.

That unequal ground is the same reason that children cannot consent to sex. Even if they say they do. The unequal ground that the two participants stand on makes true consent impossible.

 Another example like the one I gave above, would be presenting yourself to a young male child who is aroused, and allowing them to have sex with you. You could say the same thing in that situation, that they have free will. But it breaks consent. 

I looked into what you did not Emily.

You'll be at high risk of getting something called Brucellosis if you have intercourse with a dog.

On a side note my ex roommate who I'm a friend of his family is a homosexual, and he had a dog he named Bruce. ( I'm not making this up). Funny thing he would go to bed at 10PM, and he'd call Bruce for Bedtime, but Bruce never wanted to go, he wanted to stay with me instead. Roommate had to come and drag him to his room then he shut the door. That was the regular routine. To top it off he's round and has a small penis ( I once saw a picture of his penis for accident, it was a tiny round thing with a head ) and he isn't very attractive ( repulsive if you ask me) and is single and really fruity. So who knows what he did with Bruce while knowing the potential of getting Brucellosis.

.

Without reading the whole damn book on it I gather..

People with brucellosis may develop fever, sweats, headaches, back pains, and physical weakness. In severe cases, the central nervous system and the lining of the heart may be affected. One form of the illness may also cause long-lasting symptoms, including recurrent fevers, joint pain, and fatigue.

 On rare cases it is fatal, and only 100-200 cases are reported a year... Of course if someone got ill from banging their poodle they may not want that one on their record, or maybe they just obtain the antibiotic.

Biblically speaking, it's been written if someone lies with an animal they will be put to death, and by that they mean beastiality.

Also. Don't let God's forgiveness incentivise you to sin. He's far from stupid and he'll judge you accordingly. 

Blue_Jay said: 

I looked into what you did not Emily.

You'll be at high risk of getting something called Brucellosis if you have intercourse with a dog.

On a side note my ex roommate who I'm a friend of his family is a homosexual, and he had a dog he named Bruce. ( I'm not making this up). Funny thing he would go to bed at 10PM, and he'd call Bruce for Bedtime, but Bruce never wanted to go, he wanted to stay with me instead. Roommate had to come and drag him to his room then he shut the door. That was the regular routine. To top it off he's round and has a small penis ( I once saw a picture of his penis for accident, it was a tiny round thing with a head ) and he isn't very attractive ( repulsive if you ask me) and is single and really fruity. So who knows what he did with Bruce while knowing the potential of getting Brucellosis.

.

Without reading the whole damn book on it I gather..

People with brucellosis may develop fever, sweats, headaches, back pains, and physical weakness. In severe cases, the central nervous system and the lining of the heart may be affected. One form of the illness may also cause long-lasting symptoms, including recurrent fevers, joint pain, and fatigue.

 On rare cases it is fatal, and only 100-200 cases are reported a year... Of course if someone got ill from banging their poodle they may not want that one on their record, or maybe they just obtain the antibiotic.

Biblically speaking, it's been written if someone lies with an animal they will be put to death, and by that they mean beastiality.

Also. Don't let God's forgiveness incentivise you to sin. He's far from stupid and he'll judge you accordingly. 

It's not about God being stupid, "forgiveness for all sins no matter what" means forgiveness for all sins no matter what,  and God's grace and forgiveness does not incentives me to sin,  my flesh desires incentivise me to sin  I am 100 percent pure and righteous and holy in God's eyes even now in this present moment no matter what and this will never change because I have already accepted Jesus as NY Svaior and his forgiveness of all of my past, present and potentially future sins  this is what you continuously reveal to me that you do not understand and I feel so sad for you

you judge when you should not,  and you do not even understand how God judges  and it is really sad and I wish that you understood the New Testament better :/  This isn't an attack Spatial,  but you are incorrect

and by the way,  I have never had s**ual intercourse with a dog lol I have just watched porn of it  aids and some other stds sounds a lot worse than brucellosis whatever though I'll say that much  :p

Empath said: 

So, the main thing i think most people are thinking about as why this is wrong, is because of the idea that it seems impossible for an animal to give consent because we can't literally ask them.

In your scenario of how a male dog could fuck a human out of its own free will, and i think you are implying that it is consenting in that scenario, one problem with that shows when comparing it to human males.

Sometimes when men are raped, the perpetrator says that he wanted it because he was erect and even ejaculated--therefore he consented--but this is wrong. A physiological response is not consent. Women too often have positive seeming physical responses during rape like being wet and even reaching orgasm, but that has nothing to do with consent or how the experience will psychologically effect the person after. 

I would even go as far to say that if someone took advantage of a man's sex drive, by putting him in a situation to be able to have sex with them when they know he is super horny, even if he would have said no if they asked him before hand, and he has sex with them. I'd say that is a very grey area of consent. Not clear consent.

So that whole scenario with presenting yourself to a horny male dog to let them "choose" to fuck you already is not clear consent at all to me.

 

And that is all before getting into the part where a human and dog cannot be on the same intellectual level. There are things you know that the dog can't know. The dog can't know even if you explain it to them, because they can't talk.

That unequal ground is the same reason that children cannot consent to sex. Even if they say they do. The unequal ground that the two participants stand on makes true consent impossible.

 

 Another example like the one I gave above, would be presenting yourself to a young male child who is aroused, and allowing them to have sex with you. You could say the same thing in that situation, that they have free will. But it breaks consent. 

I understand this,  but since dogs are not human,  do you think that it actually traumatizes them ?  I mean,  comparing dogs to a human child-   just because some humans like to think of dogs as their children,  does not in any way shape or form mean that adult male dogs have a similar psychology to children like at all,  In my opinion  humans are just weird and try to personify dogs from my perspective  but....  They're dogs

JesusistheKing said: 

you judge when you should not,  and you do not even understand how G...

 Shut the fuck up. I so didn't.

don't see how male dogs could be harmed or why they'd feel negative emotions. sometimes people will do things to keep the dog erect; that's probably unpleasant for them. female dogs might find the experience unpleasant if a human penetrates them—there's a large phallus difference (no pun intended)