Sociopath Community

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

 What you qualify as spam isn't really the same as others though. 

 You're dunce.

That'll be all now. 

Just remembering some of the shit you deleted while mod...

 As usual you'll be the only one claiming the darndest things about me.

So now you're saying you didn't delete what you'd call spam? 

In Luna's SC spam was allowed, it wasn't up to me to delete spam and I never did.

Agree to disagree I guess, this road went nowhere before even with literal screenshots. 

Are you suggesting you came at me with this before, with screenshots ?

And you're saying you have screenshots of me deleting spam or something ?

Very tired of how you keep asking these things like you've never heard it before, but I'm trying to remind myself that you aren't doing this on purpose. 

There's logs of you arguing with Edvard over how you were doing all the work while he sat around doing nothing, there's the screenshot I have of you deleting the BBCBoingo topic, and there's plenty of logs of you changing your story over how much work you did. 

The mod log showed merit in your argument with Ed, he didn't really do too much work when it came to deleting topics, but Luna was lazy so that often left you to pick up the slack. If what you're claiming is otherwise true the copy/paste reposting I was doing would have been undisturbed. 

And let me guess, only you'll remember it, just like you're the only one who remembers me doxxing and hurting people.

When even your own support network is justifying why it's okay for you to dox those you have, rather than that you never did it, I should feel as if I don't really need to do more. The only other people you have who defend you are those who otherwise didn't read it. 

It surely wouldn't have been in Luna's SC. You went rogue when I was modded then about 3 months later Luna destroyed SC.

I'll ask, show the screenshots ( But you'll squirm away saying how you won't cause you did it a million times )

Have you not thought to ask yourself why I claim to have done so much already when talking with you? 

Have you noticed how I don't have to do that when talking to other people? 

Golden_Eagle said: 

But yes, you're really dumb dude. Not trying to insult you.

You're attempting to lower your perception of the antagonist so that you have an easier time disengaging, I've seen you fall on ad homs for similar reasoning before. 

 Does it surprise you that my perception of you is already low ?

No, nor does it surprise me when you see people on 'my team' as suddenly worse people. It's what you do so that you don't have to take perceived opposition seriously, protecting an otherwise fragile ego from bruising. You even repeat a bandwagon appeal towards how 'No one says _________', which then becomes 'You only say __________ because of TC' and 'No one in real life says these things about me'. 

It's true, I do see people on 'your team' as worse people.

Do you see how you use that though to not risk taking their critique seriously? Even people you claim to be friendly with you'll completely turn on if you presume they're agreeing with me, like that time you misunderstood what Xena was talking about and felt attacked. 

She was repeatedly trying to reassure you that she wasn't attacking you, but as usual you weren't really reading what was being said. 

Your use of the bandwagon and two-team splits is a defense mechanism. 

That thing you posted with Lena saying how I don't read posts and just make assumptions ? That's untrue and it was uncalled for, while she was losing her shit over what someone else said.

How is it untrue? 

See though, you're already doing an ad hom strike to rationalize why someone would have poor things to say about you. Rather than internalize that that's where she chose to take the argument you'll instead go out of your way to make character statements with the express goal of invalidating their claims, rather than going after the claims themselves. 

You layer on excuses for why the bad things said about you aren't real, and when that doesn't work you turn away from the conversation and seem to willfully forget that the talk even took place. 

Basically it's clear to me that you're deluded, and you'll stop at nothing to paint me in a negative light. Like a cancer I have to cut you out

It's more like chronic fact checking, your reinvention of history is strangely irksome. From my point of view you are the one who is deluded, but I'm attempting to practice sympathy towards you in it's place over how this isn't something that seems to be in your control, nor something you can adapt out of through experience. 

I'm working on trying to not respond to you over how you're clearly a victim of your own defense mechanisms. You do these reinventions to preserve yourself, and my constantly repeating the truth to you isn't really helping it sink in. 

Golden_Eagle said: 

It's similar to how you handle your Flying Monkeys rationalization; It has to be about them so that what they say about you no longer carries weight. 

 First I'll mention the Flying Monkeys phenomenon is a real psychological study.

It's your convenient excuse for when you feel that the bandwagon has turned against you.

You have rationalized every potential stage of people having opinions over you as to never have to take a critique seriously. 

Eventually I had enough so I ditched. The rest in my humble opinion is monkey business. 

Again, not how I heard it.