The fact that we’re discussing the presence of a video should be evidence enough that there was one, I don’t think the actual video needs to remain.
It isn't though, people say all kinds of nutty things on here.
The fact that we’re discussing the presence of a video should be evidence enough that there was one, I don’t think the actual video needs to remain.
It isn't though, people say all kinds of nutty things on here.
So in your hypothetical scenario of everyone saying nutty shit, a group of people who have literally never achieved consensus on anything have uniformly agreed to pretend there’s a video, and then debate its presence? No ma’am.
I’m not the morality police, but it‘s irritatingly disingenuous that you’re pretending your obsession with curating a museum of human oddity is motivated by concern for the kid.
The fact that we’re discussing the presence of a video should be evidence enough that there was one, I don’t think the actual video needs to remain.
It isn't though, people say all kinds of nutty things on here.
So in your hypothetical scenario of everyone saying nutty shit, a group of people who have literally never achieved consensus on anything have uniformly agreed to pretend there’s a video, and then debate its presence? No ma’am.
If cops can't use it as proof then it's not proof in any meaningful way. 🤷
The fact that we’re discussing the presence of a video should be evidence enough that there was one, I don’t think the actual video needs to remain.
It isn't though, people say all kinds of nutty things on here.
So in your hypothetical scenario of everyone saying nutty shit, a group of people who have literally never achieved consensus on anything have uniformly agreed to pretend there’s a video, and then debate its presence? No ma’am.
If cops can't use it as proof then it's not proof in any meaningful way. 🤷
It ain’t a smoking gun, dude. Your motives are transparent.
Now I’m no big city lawyer, but surely it’s not legal to post pics of someone else’s infant anywhere you want on the internet.
In any case, I second that this should be removed. It’s fucked up, and I think the kids wellbeing matters more than having some kind of library of evidence that CS is a bad mom.
The fact that we’re discussing the presence of a video should be evidence enough that there was one, I don’t think the actual video needs to remain.
video? i thought it was a picture of her. cs has shared these pictures, that's how people have them. and if the pics aren't up then who is to say we aren't a group of trolls targeting her for some stupid online bs?
Now I’m no big city lawyer, but surely it’s not legal to post pics of someone else’s infant anywhere you want on the internet.
In any case, I second that this should be removed. It’s fucked up, and I think the kids wellbeing matters more than having some kind of library of evidence that CS is a bad mom.
The fact that we’re discussing the presence of a video should be evidence enough that there was one, I don’t think the actual video needs to remain.
video? i thought it was a picture of her. cs has shared these pictures, that's how people have them. and if the pics aren't up then who is to say we aren't a group of trolls targeting her for some stupid online bs?
There’s a YT vid in Lena’s thread, but idk if its an actual video or just a photo compilation. Haven’t watched it.
I dunno man, still think it’s too fucked up to stay here even if that means less “evidence”. I don’t think the cops really give a shit about amateur hour CSI, I’m sure they’ve got their own methods.
Now I’m no big city lawyer, but surely it’s not legal to post pics of someone else’s infant anywhere you want on the internet.
In any case, I second that this should be removed. It’s fucked up, and I think the kids wellbeing matters more than having some kind of library of evidence that CS is a bad mom.
The fact that we’re discussing the presence of a video should be evidence enough that there was one, I don’t think the actual video needs to remain.
video? i thought it was a picture of her. cs has shared these pictures, that's how people have them. and if the pics aren't up then who is to say we aren't a group of trolls targeting her for some stupid online bs?
There’s a YT vid in Lena’s thread, but idk if its an actual video or just a photo compilation. Haven’t watched it.
I dunno man, still think it’s too fucked up to stay here even if that means less “evidence”. I don’t think the cops really give a shit about amateur hour CSI, I’m sure they’ve got their own methods.
what about her friends and family, people that unknowingly enabled and support her disgusting lifestyle? she could easily pretend she was being harassed by randoms otherwise...what about potential clients that may google her to see if she is a good lawyer...it's like a big red flag for anyone who checks her out
Now I’m no big city lawyer, but surely it’s not legal to post pics of someone else’s infant anywhere you want on the internet.
In any case, I second that this should be removed. It’s fucked up, and I think the kids wellbeing matters more than having some kind of library of evidence that CS is a bad mom.
The fact that we’re discussing the presence of a video should be evidence enough that there was one, I don’t think the actual video needs to remain.
video? i thought it was a picture of her. cs has shared these pictures, that's how people have them. and if the pics aren't up then who is to say we aren't a group of trolls targeting her for some stupid online bs?
There’s a YT vid in Lena’s thread, but idk if its an actual video or just a photo compilation. Haven’t watched it.
I dunno man, still think it’s too fucked up to stay here even if that means less “evidence”. I don’t think the cops really give a shit about amateur hour CSI, I’m sure they’ve got their own methods.
what about her friends and family, people that unknowingly enabled and support her disgusting lifestyle? she could easily pretend she was being harassed by randoms otherwise...what about potential clients that may google her to see if she is a good lawyer...it's like a big red flag for anyone who checks her out
You both have great points, and I'm sure we can all agree on one thing. We, all care about the well being of this baby, so-
We want friends and family to recognize the baby enough as evidence of what quintasia is doing, but-
We don't want strangers abusing the babies image or anything like that, as to respect the privacy of the baby.
So, let's put up pictures of the baby with a blurred face instead of the video with the face, so that friends and family can recognize the baby, but we also maintain some of the babies dignity
