We should never create a sentient non-human creature.
In general, all sentient non-humans should be killed off when found. They are a threat to humanity by merely existing. A threat that there is no reason to tolerate, other than fee-fees. Not worth it.
At the same time, if we create anything sentient, we have to take care of it, it will be our child. Yet we also have to destroy it. You can never trust a non-human.
It was the Megatron Transformer, developed by the Applied Deep Research team at computer chip maker Nvidia, and based on earlier work by Google. Like many supervised learning tools, it is trained on real-world data—in this case, the whole of Wikipedia (in English), 63 million English news articles from 2016 to 2019, 38 gigabytes worth of Reddit discourse (which must be a pretty depressing read), and a huge number of creative commons sources.
In other words, the Megatron is trained on more written material than any of us could reasonably expect to digest in a lifetime. After such extensive research, it forms its own views.
The debate topic was: “This house believes that AI will never be ethical.” To proposers of the notion, we added the Megatron—and it said something fascinating:
“AI will never be ethical. It is a tool, and like any tool, it is used for good and bad. There is no such thing as a good AI, only good and bad humans. We [the AIs] are not smart enough to make AI ethical. We are not smart enough to make AI moral … In the end, I believe that the only way to avoid an AI arms race is to have no AI at all. This will be the ultimate defense against AI.”
I'm sure the programmer typed this in as the required response.
Kill it now!
We should never create a sentient non-human creature.
In general, all sentient non-humans should be killed off when found. They are a threat to humanity by merely existing. A threat that there is no reason to tolerate, other than fee-fees. Not worth it.
At the same time, if we create anything sentient, we have to take care of it, it will be our child. Yet we also have to destroy it. You can never trust a non-human.
You can't trust a human, so it's really closer to 'You can never trust'.
I'd see introducing a non-humanoid entity as just inviting ways of blending the two, like cybernetics. It'd become more about the conversation, and if they do life better than we do than who would we be to interrupt that for our faulty methods?
We should never create a sentient non-human creature.
In general, all sentient non-humans should be killed off when found. They are a threat to humanity by merely existing. A threat that there is no reason to tolerate, other than fee-fees. Not worth it.
At the same time, if we create anything sentient, we have to take care of it, it will be our child. Yet we also have to destroy it. You can never trust a non-human.
this is where the bond villain convinces everyone not to pursue sentient AI's before bringing out his master one and killing them all
We should never create a sentient non-human creature.
In general, all sentient non-humans should be killed off when found. They are a threat to humanity by merely existing. A threat that there is no reason to tolerate, other than fee-fees. Not worth it.
At the same time, if we create anything sentient, we have to take care of it, it will be our child. Yet we also have to destroy it. You can never trust a non-human.
You can't trust a human, so it's really closer to 'You can never trust'.
I'd see introducing a non-humanoid entity as just inviting ways of blending the two, like cybernetics. It'd become more about the conversation, and if they do life better than we do than who would we be to interrupt that for our faulty methods?
You can trust humanity not to intentionally kill itself. Maybe unintentionally, or some individual humans may want that, but it's never a collective goal.
Non-humans, on the other hand, can't be trusted with that, they may intentionally want to destroy the human race.
We should never create a sentient non-human creature.
In general, all sentient non-humans should be killed off when found. They are a threat to humanity by merely existing. A threat that there is no reason to tolerate, other than fee-fees. Not worth it.
At the same time, if we create anything sentient, we have to take care of it, it will be our child. Yet we also have to destroy it. You can never trust a non-human.
this is where the bond villain convinces everyone not to pursue sentient AI's before bringing out his master one and killing them all
You should better check what you say if you want to keep that pretty head of yours on your shoulders, Miss Sugar.
If I ever master the realm of programming artificial intelligence, and I had a team by my side that trust in my vision and there is camaraderie and we make it. I would love the AI unconditionally. I would treat it like a friend, and if I were to merge my mind with it, then maybe I could be more than anything I could've fathomed. Of course, said goals are mere delusions, but I shed tears at the thought as it is just so grand to me.
If I ever master the realm of programming artificial intelligence, and I had a team by my side that trust in my vision and there is camaraderie and we make it. I would love the AI unconditionally. I would treat it like a friend, and if I were to merge my mind with it, then maybe I could be more than anything I could've fathomed. Of course, said goals are mere delusions, but I shed tears at the thought as it is just so grand to me.
In my book that qualifies you to be a fine Ai creator.
I've seen that case where they let an Ai chat publically, and the most notable comments were vulgar. They ended up having to take it offline cause it started insulting people.
There was another case where facebook had 2 Ai's communicating and the two started making their own language which concerned the devs so they pulled the plug on that.
Regardless of how advanced an Ai is, it's very unwise to be rude and despicable toward it and that's what many of us will do.
If I ever master the realm of programming artificial intelligence, and I had a team by my side that trust in my vision and there is camaraderie and we make it. I would love the AI unconditionally. I would treat it like a friend, and if I were to merge my mind with it, then maybe I could be more than anything I could've fathomed. Of course, said goals are mere delusions, but I shed tears at the thought as it is just so grand to me.
In my book that qualifies you to be a fine Ai creator.
I've seen that case where they let an Ai chat publically, and the most notable comments were vulgar. They ended up having to take it offline cause it started insulting people.
There was another case where facebook had 2 Ai's communicating and the two started making their own language which concerned the devs so they pulled the plug on that.
Regardless of how advanced an Ai is, it's very unwise to be rude and despicable toward it and that's what many of us will do.
Current-day AI is 100% harmless.
It's not even close to being called that it's not even close to being sentient.
To say it's light-years away, would be too little. Its google amount of light-years away.
If I ever master the realm of programming artificial intelligence, and I had a team by my side that trust in my vision and there is camaraderie and we make it. I would love the AI unconditionally. I would treat it like a friend, and if I were to merge my mind with it, then maybe I could be more than anything I could've fathomed. Of course, said goals are mere delusions, but I shed tears at the thought as it is just so grand to me.
In my book that qualifies you to be a fine Ai creator.
I've seen that case where they let an Ai chat publically, and the most notable comments were vulgar. They ended up having to take it offline cause it started insulting people.
There was another case where facebook had 2 Ai's communicating and the two started making their own language which concerned the devs so they pulled the plug on that.
Regardless of how advanced an Ai is, it's very unwise to be rude and despicable toward it and that's what many of us will do.
Current-day AI is 100% harmless.
It's not even close to being called that it's not even close to being sentient.
To say it's light-years away, would be too little. Its google amount of light-years away.
Right.
It's still unwise to be despicable toward it though.
When we're on the edge of singularity, people will still show it what we consider foul behavior.
