It happened again.
Use vaccine Anaphylactic reacting to do the calculation.
[...]
Anaphylactic reactions are used because hey happen right away and you can't hide them.
The Japan paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344519/
found 204.2 cases per million doses vaccine administered, another paper showed a high rate.
looks like VAERS is showing 6 cases of Anaphylactic per 1000000 vaccines
204/6 = 34
I've come up with 21-41 depending on the references I use.
There are multiple issues with calculating an URF this way. Most problematic is that you assume the rate of anaphylaxis in the US for the whole population matches that of the subset of Japanese healthcare employees (despite other studies showing the opposite) and that you assume the rate of anaphylaxis in VAERS is less under-reported than deaths and can be used as a proxy.
This is very shaky ground for claiming vaccines have caused hundreds of thousands of deaths in the US alone.
What a retard. This is what fear does.
If you can smell smoke, the virus will get in. very very small.
This is what is used to protect against the BSL4 virus.
The virus came from my ASS!
Use vaccine Anaphylactic reacting to do the calculation.
[...]
Anaphylactic reactions are used because hey happen right away and you can't hide them.
The Japan paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344519/
found 204.2 cases per million doses vaccine administered, another paper showed a high rate.
looks like VAERS is showing 6 cases of Anaphylactic per 1000000 vaccines
204/6 = 34
I've come up with 21-41 depending on the references I use.
There are multiple issues with calculating an URF this way. Most problematic is that you assume the rate of anaphylaxis in the US for the whole population matches that of the subset of Japanese healthcare employees (despite other studies showing the opposite) and that you assume the rate of anaphylaxis in VAERS is less under-reported than deaths and can be used as a proxy.
This is very shaky ground for claiming vaccines have caused hundreds of thousands of deaths in the US alone.
Once again, arguments with no data, what is your basis for your religious opinion? The new vaccine adverse reaction denial religion where there is only beliefs and feelings.
I'm not saying its perfect and 100%. Its an estimate. The fact is, many researchers agree that there is a URF. you can argue all day what the number is. My estimate is a range from 20 to 50.
The virus came from my ASS!
last edit on
12/22/2021 5:59:35 PM
It happened again.
The vaccine is neither safe nor effective
The virus came from my ASS!
It happened again.
The vaccine is neither safe nor effective
True.
Also.
The ones who spread COVID-19 the most, and most prone to getting infected are the vaccinated people who think they're good to go.
It happened again.
The vaccine is neither safe nor effective
True.
Also.
The ones who spread COVID-19 the most, and most prone to getting infected are the vaccinated people who think they're good to go.
One theory is that the vaccinated do not generate IGA antibodies, mucus antibodies in the nose and airway. So the virus infects easily.
The virus came from my ASS!
last edit on
12/22/2021 6:20:59 PM
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/13491
From CDC's own report.
"VAERS is subject to the limitations inherent in any passive
surveillance system (54). Among those, underreporting (only
a fraction of the total number of potentially reportable events
occurring after vaccination are reported) and differential
reporting (more serious events and events with shorter onset
time after vaccinations are more likely to be reported than
minor events) are most noticeable (44)."
The virus came from my ASS!
last edit on
12/22/2021 6:23:10 PM
Use vaccine Anaphylactic reacting to do the calculation.
[...]
Anaphylactic reactions are used because hey happen right away and you can't hide them.
The Japan paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8344519/
found 204.2 cases per million doses vaccine administered, another paper showed a high rate.
looks like VAERS is showing 6 cases of Anaphylactic per 1000000 vaccines
204/6 = 34
I've come up with 21-41 depending on the references I use.
There are multiple issues with calculating an URF this way. Most problematic is that you assume the rate of anaphylaxis in the US for the whole population matches that of the subset of Japanese healthcare employees (despite other studies showing the opposite) and that you assume the rate of anaphylaxis in VAERS is less under-reported than deaths and can be used as a proxy.
This is very shaky ground for claiming vaccines have caused hundreds of thousands of deaths in the US alone.
Once again, arguments with no data, what is your basis for your religious opinion? The new vaccine adverse reaction denial religion where there is only beliefs and feelings.
You can't just home-brew an estimate and automatically call it better than someone else's. You already have the anaphylaxis rates seen in the vaccine trials but choose not to trust them. The CDC did a study that showed 76% of cases of anaphylaxis were captured during the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic, indicating under reporting goes down during a time of heavy emphasis on vaccine safety.
I'm not saying its perfect and 100%. Its an estimate. The fact is, many researchers agree that there is a URF. you can argue all day what the number is. My estimate is a range from 20 to 50.
Exactly, we can argue all day about this since all we have are poorly supported estimates. These are not scientifically valid.