This men and women divisiveness thing is just weird. There is good in both and we know this. sheeesh
Just because you had a few bad encounters doesn't mean all bad. stating the obvious.
Until you look at the stats, such as who commits the vast majority of violent crimes.
This men and women divisiveness thing is just weird. There is good in both and we know this. sheeesh
Just because you had a few bad encounters doesn't mean all bad. stating the obvious.
Until you look at the stats, such as who commits the vast majority of violent crimes.
You know who else commits violent crimes disproportionately? Schizos. Kill all schizos.
This men and women divisiveness thing is just weird. There is good in both and we know this. sheeesh
Just because you had a few bad encounters doesn't mean all bad. stating the obvious.
Until you look at the stats, such as who commits the vast majority of violent crimes.
You know who else commits violent crimes disproportionately? Schizos. Kill all schizos.
Stats claim otherwise, you're likely referencing post Sybil hype.
This men and women divisiveness thing is just weird. There is good in both and we know this. sheeesh
Just because you had a few bad encounters doesn't mean all bad. stating the obvious.
Until you look at the stats, such as who commits the vast majority of violent crimes.
You know who else commits violent crimes disproportionately? Schizos. Kill all schizos.
Stats claim otherwise, you're likely referencing post Sybil hype.
Of course you don't cite anything.
Here's a source. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4905518/
Now kindly kill yourself.
This men and women divisiveness thing is just weird. There is good in both and we know this. sheeesh
Just because you had a few bad encounters doesn't mean all bad. stating the obvious.
Until you look at the stats, such as who commits the vast majority of violent crimes.
no doubt men are more violent, women just love that smell of testosterone. Chemistry or whatever you want to call it. they love men because its natural. most do anyway, there are always exceptions. they love us and we love them, so it works
This men and women divisiveness thing is just weird. There is good in both and we know this. sheeesh
Just because you had a few bad encounters doesn't mean all bad. stating the obvious.
Until you look at the stats, such as who commits the vast majority of violent crimes.
no doubt men are more violent, women just love that smell of testosterone. Chemistry or whatever you want to call it. they love men because its natural. most do anyway, there are always exceptions. they love us and we love them, so it works
So have a few 'roided up Jocks running in a giant hamster wheel with apparatus set up to bottle their smell. With time this compound can potentially be synthesized as a perfume, or more likely an Olfactory Marketing Enhancer similarly to how real estate agents bake cookies before showing off a home.
What is natural now can be adapted in a new direction over enough generations of shifted gregarious values.
Does violence towards themselves count as a 'Violent Crime' in this statistic?
Why don't you read the article, dumbass. And no it doesn't.
It's clear you didn't even click on the link. It says clearly
"Violent crime (any criminal conviction for homicide, assault, robbery, arson, any sexual offense, illegal threats, or intimidation)."
You don't even have to scroll down.
It's clear that as eloquent you want to be, you're a lot more pseudoscientific than Spatial.
Does violence towards themselves count as a 'Violent Crime' in this statistic?
Why don't you read the article, dumbass. And no it doesn't.
When I skimmed it I guess I skipped the portion that defined it:
Violent crime (any criminal conviction for homicide, assault, robbery, arson, any sexual offense, illegal threats, or intimidation).
This makes me wonder what their convictions were in particular, like how many of these ended up legitimate homicides and assaults.
I've been led to believe that most expressions of Schizophrenia tend to harm inwards unless their psychotic break's that severe. In most cases they're overloading and can't really function well enough like that to be a legitimate threat towards anyone other than themselves. The combination of that with substances definitely makes sense when it as a disorder is highly prone to self-medicating in order to try to keep themselves under control, but considering that they also list 'sexual offense, illegal threats, or intimidation' I'm wondering what the spread is like within this criteria.
That being said I'd venture that Men (around 49.2% of people) are overall a bigger threat to humanity than Schizophrenics (around 1% of people), and as we learn to cure disorders we will be ridding the world of the problem. Naturally it'd make more sense to address the bigger issue first, namely the one that's over fourty-nine times larger that continues to plague us to this day.
It's clear you didn't even click on the link. It says clearly
If I didn't click the link then why did I know they used the phrase 'Violent Crime' a ton?
Your logic makes no sense, clearly I must have clicked it if I put little quotey marks around it. In this case when I skimmed through it I accidently overlooked the portion that defined their idea of what constitutes a 'Violent Crime', which is what I was asking over.
