Sociopath Community

this is the only verse that you need to read to know that the bible is absolutely not cool with feminism, Turncoat

Romans 1:26-27

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

this is 100 percent evidence

you have no more argument left

this is the King James Version which is the most accurate and cherished English translation considered so by many

in verse 26 and 27 of Romans chapter 1 it clearly shows that both lesbianism and men being gay are equally just as bad as each other, with in fact lesbiansim looking as if it it being judged even worse than being gay because it says "even", as if that was ultra sinful and wrong and sinful, even more so than being gay

start reading and quoting from the King James Version, because it is the most accurate version and the one that I and many christians trust more than all of the other versions

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

That explanation on their part seems like a stretch, they're taking a single passage that itself also further emphasizes the male issue with it over the female one to mean that it's equal to the sheer emphasis they've stressed about men being immoral. Why did they feel the need to stress the word 'men' if it's in fact a lesson both genders are meant to learn, when that could just as easily be accomplished with unisex statements if not statements that address both in the same statement? 

If you take the texts by themselves there's a bizarre fixation against oppressing male homosexuality across the penmanship of multiple beings... while there is only a single passage that mostly just looks down upon women for it rather than equating them. 

Nah dude, if you look into the past history of humanity it is rare for women to be like crazy sex addicts and super lustful and no inhibitions, it is more of a recent trend

How recent is recent then..? 

There's plenty of history I can show you where women show a strong sexual drive. Haven't you ever heard the expression "Prostitution's the Oldest Profession"? 

The Bible doesn't really do any justice to women either, typically saying that to find a good and trustworthy wife is rare while also showing stories from names like Eve, Lilith, Jezebel, Herodias, Athaliah, Maacah, Delilah, Sitidos and many others serve as examples time after time as to how women can't be trusted to make decisions on their own. 

They have the audacity to say shit like: 

Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control. - 1 Timothy 2:11-15

To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.” - Genesis 3:16

The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. - 1 Corinthians 14:34

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

basically, IT IS EVEN MORE ABNORMAL FOR WOMEN TO BE SEXUALLY IMMORAL AND LUSTFUL THAN MEN, because men by nature have much higher sex drives

with women, we usually only develop high sex drives due to being abused especially in younger years

This is definitely not the only reason women can end up with higher sex drives. 

you know psychology Turncoat and you know this is true about human beings and about the female gender in particular

I've also seen from this so called 'Psychology' that women tend to present more openness than men to homosexual experiences, and that women tend to group together for a communal sense of safety. 

Lesbianism is more natural, and even The Bible seems to be pretty cool with it. It just seems to be an issue with dicks. 

it is only recently with the satanic feminism movement on the rise that women are developing super high sex drives and all of this stuff literally coming onto men and women and doing all sorts of abnormal female sexual behavior

You still haven't explained to me how Feminism is Satanic. 

because it is fake feminism, the "feminist movement"

 

true feminism is being a loving nurturing caring mother and helping to raise a family, which is what Jesus is encouraging me to become

 

soft and gentle and sweet and loving, and respectful to men, and loyal and faithful to their husbands

 

women were CREATED for men, to be their partners in helping to raise a family

 

THIS IS SO BASIC TURNCOAT

Feminism is about equality between the sexes, I don't know what you're going on about. 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

That explanation on their part seems like a stretch, they're taking a single passage that itself also further emphasizes the male issue with it over the female one to mean that it's equal to the sheer emphasis they've stressed about men being immoral. Why did they feel the need to stress the word 'men' if it's in fact a lesson both genders are meant to learn, when that could just as easily be accomplished with unisex statements if not statements that address both in the same statement? 

If you take the texts by themselves there's a bizarre fixation against oppressing male homosexuality across the penmanship of multiple beings... while there is only a single passage that mostly just looks down upon women for it rather than equating them. 

Nah dude, if you look into the past history of humanity it is rare for women to be like crazy sex addicts and super lustful and no inhibitions, it is more of a recent trend

How recent is recent then..? 

There's plenty of history I can show you where women show a strong sexual drive. Haven't you ever heard the expression "Prostitution's the Oldest Profession"? 

The Bible doesn't really do any justice to women either, typically saying that to find a good and trustworthy wife is rare while also showing stories from names like Lilith, Jezebel, Herodias, Athaliah, Maacah, Delilah, Sitidos and many others serve as examples time after time as to how women can't be trusted to make decisions on their own. 

They have the audacity to say shit like: 

---

Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control. - 1 Timothy 2:11-15

To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.” - Genesis 3:16

The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. - 1 Corinthians 14:34

---

 

they didn't have high sex drives just because, they did it for money 

I brought up prostitution in this thread, you must have not read what I wrote about it, I said it was the only normal form of aexual immorality for women in the past until recent times, and then I said except for probably during the times of Noah

JesusistheKing said: 

this is the only verse that you need to read to know that the bible is absolutely not cool with feminism, Turncoat

 

Romans 1:26-27

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

 

 

this is 100 percent evidence

 

you have no more argument left

 

this is the King James Version which is the most accurate and cherished English translation considered so by many

 

 bump

Romans 1:26 literally calls lesbianiam a vile affection lol

you have been defeated, Turncoat

😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊✝️😁

I love being right

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

That explanation on their part seems like a stretch, they're taking a single passage that itself also further emphasizes the male issue with it over the female one to mean that it's equal to the sheer emphasis they've stressed about men being immoral. Why did they feel the need to stress the word 'men' if it's in fact a lesson both genders are meant to learn, when that could just as easily be accomplished with unisex statements if not statements that address both in the same statement? 

If you take the texts by themselves there's a bizarre fixation against oppressing male homosexuality across the penmanship of multiple beings... while there is only a single passage that mostly just looks down upon women for it rather than equating them. 

Nah dude, if you look into the past history of humanity it is rare for women to be like crazy sex addicts and super lustful and no inhibitions, it is more of a recent trend

How recent is recent then..? 

There's plenty of history I can show you where women show a strong sexual drive. Haven't you ever heard the expression "Prostitution's the Oldest Profession"? 

The Bible doesn't really do any justice to women either, typically saying that to find a good and trustworthy wife is rare while also showing stories from names like Lilith, Jezebel, Herodias, Athaliah, Maacah, Delilah, Sitidos and many others serve as examples time after time as to how women can't be trusted to make decisions on their own. 

They have the audacity to say shit like: 

---

Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control. - 1 Timothy 2:11-15

To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.” - Genesis 3:16

The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. - 1 Corinthians 14:34

---

they didn't have high sex drives just because, they did it for money 

Are you seriously trying to tell me about how all women's sex drives work? 

Even outside of behavioral reasons or reasons of one's environment there's even women with higher T-counts that are typically more DTF than their Estrogenic counterparts. 

I brought up prostitution in this thread, you must have not read what I wrote about it, I said it was the only normal form of aexual immorality for women in the past until recent times, and then I said except for probably during the times of Noah

What?

I don't get how you can think that women would only desire sex if they were abused. 

JesusistheKing said: 

Romans 1:26 literally calls lesbianiam a vile affection lol

It just calls it unpleasant and unnatural, that's it. 

Compare this to passages in relation to men and it discusses how they'll die and suffer, emphasizing their gender repeatedly in the list of things to not fall prey to only when it comes to matters of homosexuality. 

The emphasis must mean something. 

JesusistheKing said: 

in verse 26 and 27 of Romans chapter 1 it clearly shows that both lesbianism and men being gay are equally just as bad as each other, with in fact lesbiansim looking as if it it being judged even worse than being gay because it says "even", as if that was ultra sinful and wrong and sinful, even more so than being gay

 

start reading and quoting from the King James Version, because it is the most accurate version and the one that I and many christians trust more than all of the other versions

 

 bump

you ignoring the very clear obvious plain as day evidence just makes you look stupid, vile affections means vile affections



sorry my dude