I tried to earn some snark about that $10.00, but I don't see a point in this debate where I'm 'uncomfortable to admit but which I have to concede' specifically. We're coming at this from very opposite angles and even areas where I could potentially end up agreeing with him he keeps intentionally vague or otherwise incomplete.
Like what areas? I think you're unable to agree with him because you have a bias.
I mean I'm working off of years of data collection on the guy, connecting older things he's mentioned from former topics to form a larger conclusion than just over what's in this topic alone. To me this has been more about a case study dig through how he sees the symbol of flowers, alongside whatever other tangents came from it to learn more about his opinion by contrast to my own.
You know, sort of like you do for Inquirer.
Naturally when you're choosing to focus more on the individual rather than the subject itself over a basis of collected history it's going to reflect some level of bias in the discussion. I also didn't really see either of us as holding the other to a professional standard when it came to this banter, inviting the room for more means of discourse than we might otherwise see, as if we were I'd imagine us both poking more at the portions that serve to tangent from the discussion rather than us both feeding them.
I can't really demonstrate it very quantitatively. However, I rarely, if ever, see you concede anything. I'm also inclined to take your response as further evidence. I think you understand that, in order to get anywhere in a conversation, you should start from somewhere where you do agree.
Wait why?
I understand going at it from a point of following the same rules of discourse, if that counts as an agreement then yeah that's sensible, but if two people are going at it from opposite viewpoints then the only room for concession is to seek it out through continued discussion.
The guy makes defining anything he's talking about like pulling teeth.
Yet, I never see you do that. You're smart, though, and so I think it's not that you're unaware.
What I saw from SpatialMind were at least attempts to reason through evidence. Whether that evidence was flawed or not, I don't care so much about
His evidence is barely anecdotal, I'd opt to use another word for it entirely.
From you, I didn't see much of that. It was mostly re-iterating what SpatialMind was saying, trying to infer intent behind his words (somehow his intent seems to always turn out to be less than flattering in your analysis).
From what I've seen of his behavior, if he isn't pushed while simultaneously being supported by another party he'll keep what his true meaning is close to his chest. He needs to feel challenged in order to find that spark that gets him typing and he needs cheerleaders in order to keep that steam alive. At multiple points in this topic he's tried to leave important portions intentionally vague while practically leaning on the 'common sense' fallacy through implication to do most of the heavy lifting for him.
I reckon TC is drawing conclusions about me to make himself look better than he really is.
Anyone who truthfully collected data on my behavior in SC would list the following..
- I sympathize with the doxxed. Especially if the doxxed individual is afraid. I'll write to them suggesting that there isn't really anything to be afraid of. I never knew pink very well, but I wasn't impressed with TC power tripping and contacting her place of residence and making a big show of it.
- I'm Kind. When I gave Jim $50 in crypto, it was during a time when him myself and Trypt were chatting. Jim was talking about his current struggle and how he's starving. When I offered to help Jim, I told him even though this is possibly a scam, I'll send some aid just in case it isn't. Long story short it's widely believed that I was foolish to send anything to Jim and that he tricked me etc. An epic tale of me getting punk'd. In my opinion $50 is a small toll to pay to know if I was going to watch a man burn when I couldn't done something.
- I fought a Cancer patient. There was once a member known as TNP, for some reason threatened to hunt me down and kill me. This was after I was doxxed. Another time he went on how he would chew me up like a dog chews a bone. I told him "You may not have deserved your illness, but you sure as hell are earning it". All of a sudden Alia and Ed doubled down on their harassment against me, and TNP turned on Alia stating how he's grateful I'm not treating him like a handicapped person or treating him accordingly because he's ill. Let the record show, that TNP and I set aside out differences and our relations became loving. Despite that, it went on for years that I cursed a cancer patient as though I were pleased with his illness.
- I was rude to Alia Some members say I treated her like shit because she doxxed me. That isn't true, my dox is still up and running and we can see that my relationship with Alia was somewhat cordial for 3 months. It was when she waited until my Birthday midnight sharp to dox children in my family before I started shredding her mind. Ed's complaint was that she wasn't used to being treated that way. Over time Alia became less popular and ignored before she left SC. Ed, who would also suck on Alia's anus vowed to be more mortal enemy. On a side note, despite Ed's passionate rage toward me, TC does more more dirty, no arguing that.
- I don't like bullies. And the bullies don't seem to like me either.
And the list goes on. I invite TC to list everything he thinks I've done wrong, he won't. The community would be able to authenticate his claims and surely deem them false.
My track record is by far cleaner than TC's record, while his history is filled with multiple counts of betrayal, doxxing, harassment, delusions, tantrums, suicide threat, and the big one.... Homosexuality ! ( jk, but the rest is true. I'm indifferent to people's sexual preferences, TC is clearly a bisexual tranny btw. And yes I'm aware my sense of humor probably annoys TC. )
As for flowers. As I've said I'm indifferent to them and it's known use cases. While other children boast about getting flowers, the children in my life boast about getting something cool + the flowers, granted other people in the child's circle will give them flowers, which are soon forgotten and discarded.
This does not mean I hate flowers, and if I did hate flowers as one here assumed, it shouldn't spiral off into battle. I did find this debate ridiculous.
My message to you Legga. Well done. I'm glad when people can make sense of what's laid before them. You've been around for awhile and like everyone else you have your own track record of me, so it's funny when TC even tries to play that card with you.
