Lenalee said:Press it all you want, I know who I am and what I'm capable of and I'd never get into a relationship with a cheater. How you get em is how they leave you and i believe Karma is a thing.What are your views on karma?
Shit you earn based on your actions and behaviors and that this all affects your next lifetime.
You're cool with reincarnation but you can't believe in Astrology?
Hate horoscopes
Why?
"If this doesn't apply to you today then maybe it's for someone else, check back next time!"
It's just a bunch of vague stuff that can apply to anyone. Cold reading and stuff. Kinda like psychic readings and tarot cards can be the same sometimes and i can throw in some childhood shit about it, but it's stuff with no actual science behind it
Predictive astrology is distinct from psychological astrology. Do you hate both or just the tabloid horoscope side of it?
Sigh
Both.
lol Most people who don't believe in astrology don't feel this strongly about it. Did you grow up with an annoying astrologer or something? XD
Predictive, I agree. As well as the idea of psychological astrology being directly the result of stars and planets themselves. But the stars and planets are merely a clock for a cycle, an understandable misattribution by early civilizations trying to account for observable patterns while using the sky as their calendar. That said, is there something you find not sound about the idea that environmental conditions would influence fetal development on a cycle? Nature already functions on a seemingly endless web of cycles, one that blatantly affects the development of other living organisms, I see no reason we'd be different, our bodies were designed of and within the same system. We can even observe it affecting our neurological function in adulthood, through things like cyclical sunlight deficiency, both in ourselves and other mammals. It stands to reason that in our extremely malleable and receptive early development stages, we'd be even more susceptible to the influence of these cycles. There are already more studies being done connecting birth season and even birth month to heightened and lowered likelihoods of traits both mental and physical. The research is scant so far, but it's there at all, and it's growing. Some of which has plainly correlated with commonly accepted astrological data. There's a tremendous amount still unknown about the human brain, I think simply saying the science isn't there for it yet far from rules out the possibility.
Even if you think most of it is hokey exaggerations and confirmation bias, there could at the very least, easily be scientific roots for the practice. A number of ancient mystical traditions rooted in science in some form. Such as shamans making predictions based on bird behavior. Taken as purely magical/spiritual in its day, and certainly expounded upon beyond its realistic bounds, but much of it based in legitimate reading of the patterns of animals more sensitive to the movements of nature than ourselves, using them to predict things like natural disasters with some degree of accuracy. As astrology is based on cycles within nature, it could easily be argued that the entire practice arose from early people recognizing valid patterns of likelihood in human behavior and assuming, as they typically did, that it was the work of a higher power. (Which I'd argue is true, since I see nature as God, and many of them did too, but I suppose that's beside the point.)