Sociopath Community

Good said: 

Funny, this is exactly your problem. I understand you completely, its just irrelevant bullshit.

But also these fallacies are bullshit, without context explanation, as they are not always true and can be used to manipulate the debate.

If you see it as irrelevant bullshit, then you don't understand me completely (beyond maybe some Nihilism arguments). 

Why do you figure that I want Roplox, just Roplox, unbanned? 

so don't post these pictures to me again, because I will just mock you next time.

And don't fucking take detail and blow it out of proportion. I don't care if I said that you wanted to ban them both or just one. It doesn't matter you pathetic loser.

It's two separate people who each did different things though, it's not fair to just target everyone involved because of said involvement. 

There's no reason to ban Roplox. 

My post is exactly the same, with the exact same meaning, either way. If it's to prove I am emotional when posting, well jeez, I don't know what gave it way, was it the 1st or the 1000 insult? It's like you are proving yet another irrelevant argument. 

You kept trying to tell people you weren't being emotional though. 

This is why YOU ARE A WASTE OF TIME. This entire post of mine, above the line here, brings nothing to any conversation and does nothing to further any debate, it's just to refute your baseless, stupid, and arrogant assumptions. The only reason it is made is for this segment below the line. To serve as an example of what bullshit arguments you make.

It would further it if you'd seperate Roplox from Chaos. 

Turncoat said: 

My post is exactly the same, with the exact same meaning, either way. If it's to prove I am emotional when posting, well jeez, I don't know what gave it way, was it the 1st or the 1000 insult? It's like you are proving yet another irrelevant argument. 

You kept trying to tell people you weren't being emotional though. 

No, I didn't. At least this time, I don't remember before. What however I have said before and I will now, is that me being emotional, is.... <drum rolls> irrelevant! <ba-dum-tss>!

Because my actions are still logical. I just don't pretend to be emotionless. And I enjoy it very much.

Your dead ass website could only use more members and activity, keep em

Good said: 

Because my actions are still logical. I just don't pretend to be emotionless. And I enjoy it very much.

I fail to see how it's logical to ban Roplox unless he continues posting the same dox over and over. 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Because my actions are still logical. I just don't pretend to be emotionless. And I enjoy it very much.

I fail to see how it's logical to ban Roplox unless he continues posting the same dox over and over. 

I fail to see why you think i have any emotional response towards roplox. I think he is retarded, but thats very common thought i have around here. Chaos is the one i am more annoyed at. And the one more likely to be unbanned due to logical reasoning. I still think it makes more sense he is banned too though.

I already explained why he(roplox) was banned. That is also the reason he is to stay banned, that should be self-explanatory.

AlmightyJim said: 

Your dead ass website could only use more members and activity, keep em

 then vote it so

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Because my actions are still logical. I just don't pretend to be emotionless. And I enjoy it very much.

I fail to see how it's logical to ban Roplox unless he continues posting the same dox over and over. 

I fail to see why you think i have any emotional response towards roplox.

If there's no emotional response towards Roplox, then you're fine with unbanning? 

I think he is retarded, but thats very common thought i have around here.

Indeed, it's part of this place's charm. 

We all think ourselves the guests to the circus (other than the narcs who assume ringleader), but everyone else sees us among the main attractions on display here. As long as everyone here feels like power-leveling without questioning the lack of cages we'll always have lolcow milk. 

Chaos is the one i am more annoyed at. And the one more likely to be unbanned due to logical reasoning. I still think it makes more sense he is banned too though.

The guy could have waited before reporting the site if he cared about it, I have no sympathy there. You can also check his chat/post history here to see more about who you're dealing with, as so far from my own end he seems to talk about how much he doesn't care for it here. 

By contrast anti-pedo sentiments have been a voice here and there's a mild dox history here that's embellished much over word-of-mouth, so Roplox's behaviors are practically expected. 

I already explained why he(roplox) was banned. That is also the reason he is to stay banned, that should be self-explanatory.

Did I miss him doing anything more than being beneath your standard of intelligence and posting a dox? 

Does "unban both" count as an "unban roplox" vote? 

Because TC, there was a complaint to the host, because someone made a dox here, which is against their TOS. Do I have to spell it out? So to get the site back I have to ban the doxxer.
I fucking swear I already wrote this. 2 other times.

Good said: 

Because TC, there was a complaint to the host, because someone made a dox here, which is against their TOS. Do I have to spell it out? So to get the site back I have to ban the doxxer.
I fucking swear I already wrote this. 2 other times.

Their TOS is against doxes? Well shit, then we need a new one, maybe whatever Kiwi uses. 

Is it still a dox if it doesn't reveal their identity though? 

Wait, either it's the same host or I'm screwing something up. 

Does this mean they're subject to the same problem..? 

Edit: Yep.