Sociopath Community

You realize I studied this for 8 years? There are two  reasons why I reply to you in an unelaborate way:

1. I am not really interested in this discussion 

2. I am not on a computer and thus typing a lot etc is inconvenient

Your argumentation is very flawed. You seem to imply that what I say is based on some oversimplified dichotomous understanding of functionality, yet you basically say because she moved out she can't have ocd. That shit just doesn't make sense and you seem to have a very simple and linear understanding of all this. Also you do realize that this isn't law, yes? You can't just do the usual shit and go crazy on semantics to win the argument. 

Some of the worst psych practitioners the majority of us have seen were 8 year degree carriers, unless you mean you studied it on your own for 8 years? If so, I have more years than that on you. 😉

When you actually want to argue it instead of pussing out, let me know, otherwise I'll let you take your leave with what dignity you have left. As is you're reduced to strawmanning my argument into a more simplified form to feel better about yourself, which is a shame. 

I'm not saying a degree makes me a good therapist, not at all. But for me there is no point of discussing things that you clearly do not know enough about etc and I am not interested in having you copy and pasting definitions over definitions etc here and dissecting them etc. Please Turncoat, Im sure you know what you do, so have some sympathy for me with this. What I said in regards to ocd and mental illness is really not controversial at all and you can look it up etc. Since it can easily be verified and falsified only through semantic autism there is really no reason to discuss here further. What could be controversial however is that I said Crave had OCD. Here you have said she doesnt have it. I told you I can't know this, because I do not know her now. From a clinical perspective the fact that she moved out and studies now does not mean that she does not or did not have OCD. You clearly seemed not even to be aware of the fact that there is a type of ocd in the icd10 that is purely thought based. Even after I have proven this to you directly you seemed to try and dispute it. This is another example of you obsessively trying to be right when you are wrong, but OK, I want to keep it subject based. You try to say there was/is no clinically relevant suffering and thus there is no disorder. In my clinical impression some years ago I clearly felt that she is under much distress and anxiety because of her (at least at the time) unfounded ocd thoughts. That alone is sufficient to fulfill this criteria in the common diagnostic manuals. You seem to think one has to screw up their life etc for it to classify as a mental disorder, which is not true. Everything I say in regard to mental disorders or ocd any mental health person can verify to you and also the diagnostic manuals are helpful. Maybe don't just focus on ICD 10 but also look in literature. I can give you some authors. I am not trying to be belittling at this point, but there is really no reason to discuss or argue about these technical things further since these things are just facts that anyone can easily verify. 

ddddddd said: 

I'm not saying a degree makes me a good therapist, not at all. But for me there is no point of discussing things that you clearly do not know enough about etc and I am not interested in having you copy and pasting definitions over definitions etc here and dissecting them etc. Please Turncoat, Im sure you know what you do, so have some sympathy for me with this. What I said in regards to ocd and mental illness is really not controversial at all and you can look it up etc. Since it can easily be verified and falsified only through semantic autism there is really no reason to discuss here further. What could be controversial however is that I said Crave had OCD. Here you have said she doesnt have it. I told you I can't know this, because I do not know her now. From a clinical perspective the fact that she moved out and studies now does not mean that she does not or did not have OCD. You clearly seemed not even to be aware of the fact that there is a type of ocd in the icd10 that is purely thought based. Even after I have proven this to you directly you seemed to try and dispute it. This is another example of you obsessively trying to be right when you are wrong, but OK, I want to keep it subject based. You try to say there was/is no clinically relevant suffering and thus there is no disorder. In my clinical impression some years ago I clearly felt that she is under much distress and anxiety because of her (at least at the time) unfounded ocd thoughts. That alone is sufficient to fulfill this criteria in the common diagnostic manuals. You seem to think one has to screw up their life etc for it to classify as a mental disorder, which is not true. Everything I say in regard to mental disorders or ocd any mental health person can verify to you and also the diagnostic manuals are helpful. Maybe don't just focus on ICD 10 but also look in literature. I can give you some authors. I am not trying to be belittling at this point, but there is really no reason to discuss or argue about these technical things further since these things are just facts that anyone can easily verify. 

Damn dude, I thought you said you were on your phone. 

I'll format this shit and give it a real read later. 

Yeah I am. I made the effort because you called me a pussy. 

Turncoat said: 

ddddddd said: 

I'm not saying a degree makes me a good therapist, not at all. But for me there is no point of discussing things that you clearly do not know enough about etc and I am not interested in having you copy and pasting definitions over definitions etc here and dissecting them etc. Please Turncoat, Im sure you know what you do, so have some sympathy for me with this. What I said in regards to ocd and mental illness is really not controversial at all and you can look it up etc. Since it can easily be verified and falsified only through semantic autism there is really no reason to discuss here further. What could be controversial however is that I said Crave had OCD. Here you have said she doesnt have it. I told you I can't know this, because I do not know her now. From a clinical perspective the fact that she moved out and studies now does not mean that she does not or did not have OCD. You clearly seemed not even to be aware of the fact that there is a type of ocd in the icd10 that is purely thought based. Even after I have proven this to you directly you seemed to try and dispute it. This is another example of you obsessively trying to be right when you are wrong, but OK, I want to keep it subject based. You try to say there was/is no clinically relevant suffering and thus there is no disorder. In my clinical impression some years ago I clearly felt that she is under much distress and anxiety because of her (at least at the time) unfounded ocd thoughts. That alone is sufficient to fulfill this criteria in the common diagnostic manuals. You seem to think one has to screw up their life etc for it to classify as a mental disorder, which is not true. Everything I say in regard to mental disorders or ocd any mental health person can verify to you and also the diagnostic manuals are helpful. Maybe don't just focus on ICD 10 but also look in literature. I can give you some authors. I am not trying to be belittling at this point, but there is really no reason to discuss or argue about these technical things further since these things are just facts that anyone can easily verify. 

Damn dude, I thought you said you were on your phone. 

I'll format this shit and give it a real read later. 

 Your average post is literally 1000 times harder to read than this.

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

ddddddd said: 

I'm not saying a degree makes me a good therapist, not at all. But for me there is no point of discussing things that you clearly do not know enough about etc and I am not interested in having you copy and pasting definitions over definitions etc here and dissecting them etc. Please Turncoat, Im sure you know what you do, so have some sympathy for me with this. What I said in regards to ocd and mental illness is really not controversial at all and you can look it up etc. Since it can easily be verified and falsified only through semantic autism there is really no reason to discuss here further. What could be controversial however is that I said Crave had OCD. Here you have said she doesnt have it. I told you I can't know this, because I do not know her now. From a clinical perspective the fact that she moved out and studies now does not mean that she does not or did not have OCD. You clearly seemed not even to be aware of the fact that there is a type of ocd in the icd10 that is purely thought based. Even after I have proven this to you directly you seemed to try and dispute it. This is another example of you obsessively trying to be right when you are wrong, but OK, I want to keep it subject based. You try to say there was/is no clinically relevant suffering and thus there is no disorder. In my clinical impression some years ago I clearly felt that she is under much distress and anxiety because of her (at least at the time) unfounded ocd thoughts. That alone is sufficient to fulfill this criteria in the common diagnostic manuals. You seem to think one has to screw up their life etc for it to classify as a mental disorder, which is not true. Everything I say in regard to mental disorders or ocd any mental health person can verify to you and also the diagnostic manuals are helpful. Maybe don't just focus on ICD 10 but also look in literature. I can give you some authors. I am not trying to be belittling at this point, but there is really no reason to discuss or argue about these technical things further since these things are just facts that anyone can easily verify. 

Damn dude, I thought you said you were on your phone. 

I'll format this shit and give it a real read later. 

 Your average post is literally 1000 times harder to read than this.

Is not, mine has excessive paragraphing to split the ideas apart. 

Can't you tell the difference? 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

ddddddd said: 

I'm not saying a degree makes me a good therapist, not at all. But for me there is no point of discussing things that you clearly do not know enough about etc and I am not interested in having you copy and pasting definitions over definitions etc here and dissecting them etc. Please Turncoat, Im sure you know what you do, so have some sympathy for me with this. What I said in regards to ocd and mental illness is really not controversial at all and you can look it up etc. Since it can easily be verified and falsified only through semantic autism there is really no reason to discuss here further. What could be controversial however is that I said Crave had OCD. Here you have said she doesnt have it. I told you I can't know this, because I do not know her now. From a clinical perspective the fact that she moved out and studies now does not mean that she does not or did not have OCD. You clearly seemed not even to be aware of the fact that there is a type of ocd in the icd10 that is purely thought based. Even after I have proven this to you directly you seemed to try and dispute it. This is another example of you obsessively trying to be right when you are wrong, but OK, I want to keep it subject based. You try to say there was/is no clinically relevant suffering and thus there is no disorder. In my clinical impression some years ago I clearly felt that she is under much distress and anxiety because of her (at least at the time) unfounded ocd thoughts. That alone is sufficient to fulfill this criteria in the common diagnostic manuals. You seem to think one has to screw up their life etc for it to classify as a mental disorder, which is not true. Everything I say in regard to mental disorders or ocd any mental health person can verify to you and also the diagnostic manuals are helpful. Maybe don't just focus on ICD 10 but also look in literature. I can give you some authors. I am not trying to be belittling at this point, but there is really no reason to discuss or argue about these technical things further since these things are just facts that anyone can easily verify. 

Damn dude, I thought you said you were on your phone. 

I'll format this shit and give it a real read later. 

 Your average post is literally 1000 times harder to read than this.

Is not, mine has excessive paragraphing to split the ideas apart. 

Can't you tell the difference? 

Can anybody with an unbiased opinion back me up on this. 

Crave was never doxed on SC and I don't recall her ever talking about OCD, you might be confusing her for someone else tbh

D7 just did a wall of text which is difficult to read cos no paragraphs and i gave up while TC does write a lot and can suddenly make paragraphs out of one sentence it's not as difficult to read as an actual wall of text.