Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 14 posts
0 votes

site would be dead af without me


Posts: 1511

admit it

Posts: 1111
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...

Prove it

go away for 30 days and see if it's still here

I Took The Liberty Of Fertilizing Your Caviar.
last edit on 7/2/2019 4:53:49 AM
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...

Why would I leave? This is my territory and what I e-fought for for years. I changed S-C and it now even stands on different ground, it was all an elaborate plan disguised as attention whoring.

And even after I told you old-casts this, you will continue to tag along like the meek people you are :]. Hey, even the Discord losers old-casts lurk here, SC has become that interesting because of the more recent additions of users.

Thanks for being so co-operative and staying despite having taken the obvious L with the whole CP spam war, which you have often called "facade" out of spite. Without you old-casts, there would be nobody left to ridicule. The newer generations have thick skin, don't take the site seriously and are reasonable.

last edit on 7/2/2019 8:53:40 AM
Posts: 566
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...
Cawk said: 

Why would I leave? This is my territory and what I e-fought for for years. I changed S-C and it now even stands on different ground, it was all an elaborate plan disguised as attention whoring.

And even after I told you old-casts this, you will continue to tag along like the meek people you are :]. Hey, even the Discord losers old-casts lurk here, SC has become that interesting because of the more recent additions of users.

Thanks for being so co-operative and staying despite have taken the obvious L with the whole CP spam war, which you have often called "facade" out of spite. Without you old-casts, there would be nobody left to ridicule. The newer generations have thick skin, don't take the site seriously and are reasonable.

 wow, being in Jim's shadow really got to you

I am with you, even unto the end of the age
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...
Kestrel said: 
Cawk said: 

Why would I leave? This is my territory and what I e-fought for for years. I changed S-C and it now even stands on different ground, it was all an elaborate plan disguised as attention whoring.

And even after I told you old-casts this, you will continue to tag along like the meek people you are :]. Hey, even the Discord losers old-casts lurk here, SC has become that interesting because of the more recent additions of users.

Thanks for being so co-operative and staying despite have taken the obvious L with the whole CP spam war, which you have often called "facade" out of spite. Without you old-casts, there would be nobody left to ridicule. The newer generations have thick skin, don't take the site seriously and are reasonable.

 wow, being in Jim's shadow really got to you

 wow, i really got to an old-cast

It doesn't need to be pointed out, I already know I piss off those people in question just by being here, making pedophilic posts and displaying my lack of care about social status. The best thing about it is, I don't cross the line to be banned and easily gotten disposed of. I fuck with loop-holes, it leaves janitors in an indecisive state of action.

With that said, I lack the troll vibe that Jim has, this makes him very likable. Also I was not around for long before I started being banned on sight, and when I was, I was a troubled kid who made 0 effort to be liked, just like now.

Posts: 1937
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...

Life would be ded without ur cuteness cawk chan

2:48Spatial Mind The guy was sticking his dick in an infants mouth, it was so fucking disturbing
Posts: 32850
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...
Cawk said: 

Why would I leave?

To commit to a social experiment to see what'd happen without you. 

I already know the place would survive with you taking said month hiatus, so I see no reason for you to bother, but that would at least be the "why". 

This is my territory and what I e-fought for for years. I changed S-C and it now even stands on different ground, it was all an elaborate plan disguised as attention whoring.

I think you'd stand to make more sense to people if you were more honest about how adaptive instead of rigid that your tactics and allegiances are. 

And even after I told you old-casts this, you will continue to tag along like the meek people you are :]. Hey, even the Discord losers old-casts lurk here, SC has become that interesting because of the more recent additions of users.

Yeah you seem a lot more excited to socialize with SC now, instead of before when you wanted EC to have nothing to do with SC at all

Thanks for being so co-operative and staying despite having taken the obvious L with the whole CP spam war, which you have often called "facade" out of spite. Without you old-casts, there would be nobody left to ridicule.

The new cast isn't subject to your mockery? 

The newer generations have thick skin, don't take the site seriously and are reasonable.

Hah

Not "taking something seriously" is independent of if they can handle it or not. In one hand it can be a natural response, but in the other it's just an act of self-protection. They're also equally prone to tag along behaviors, but their bandwagon uses a slightly different fuel than the older one (a lot of old cast are converting their bandwagon towards the newer fuel though). 

This crowd you're celebrating are a large part of the "Why can't we all just get along?" infection, and I for one thought you'd be more against that than for it. For the majority they aren't "reasonable", they're conflict-avoidant and think they can just hover around watching others beef it instead of them, and unlike the old cast that were browbeaten into different forms of submission, many of the newer folk are too afraid to really get their hands dirty in the first place (even my cleaner kind of dirty). The older group was more of an open vector for wounds, which made them more inherently honest, while now we're dealing with a period of shrouding their jade and shade with memes and group-based protections. 

As I've said before, we're all participants of this freak circus, no one person here isn't a carnival attraction. 


TLDR; The new way is one of cowardice and deflection, while the old way was so triggered they couldn't help themselves. It's how they make unspoken agreements through synergistic issues as an ingroup that stands to change the culture the most. 

Cawk said:
With that said, I lack the troll vibe that Jim has, this makes him very likable.
Being affable is the ultimate weapon, imo. You can do terrible things and people will still want to like you, even compromising themselves and their values at points to see it done. 

Being likable is how to garner sympathy, and for Jim it's allowed a little bit of ghosting time to have himself be forgiven by much of the bandwagon overtime. He's also a very interesting case where he shows us that not sucking up to people and doing seemingly deplorable things is almost an independent factor from likability. 

It is odd to watch people behave as if they were waiting for an excuse to demonize him... only to have it fade in a day or three and have things be business as usual. It sells "triggered" harder when they revert away from it later. 
 
Also I was not around for long before I started being banned on sight, and when I was, I was a troubled kid who made 0 effort to be liked, just like now.

You do kinda remind me of a smarter version of Wilechaser. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 7/2/2019 7:59:52 PM
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...
Cawk said: 

Why would I leave?

To commit to a social experiment to see what'd happen without you. 

Do you know what rhetorical questions are? That was one.



I already know the place would survive with you taking said month hiatus, so I see no reason for you to bother, but that would at least be the "why". 

It would survive, no doubt. But have low activity, this is what I meant by "dead af": LOW ACTIVITY.

 

This is my territory and what I e-fought for for years. I changed S-C and it now even stands on different ground, it was all an elaborate plan disguised as attention whoring.

I think you'd stand to make more sense to people if you were more honest about how adaptive instead of rigid that your tactics and allegiances are. 

I did not lie when I wrote that I wanted to cause a change in SC.

And even after I told you old-casts this, you will continue to tag along like the meek people you are :]. Hey, even the Discord losers old-casts lurk here, SC has become that interesting because of the more recent additions of users.

Yeah you seem a lot more excited to socialize with SC now, instead of before when you wanted EC to have nothing to do with SC at all

It's not like SC came to stay as regulars anyway. I was looking for options to save the project, while you were waiting, doing absolutely nothing, afraid to take action and possibly make mistakes.

Waiting is not always bad, but yours was.

Thanks for being so co-operative and staying despite having taken the obvious L with the whole CP spam war, which you have often called "facade" out of spite. Without you old-casts, there would be nobody left to ridicule.

The new cast isn't subject to your mockery? 

I get along with the "new-cast" or rather, SC inhabitants, with nearly if not all of them, just fine.

My "closest to old-cast behavior" like Ed described me, will continue on. I don't have a reason to attack anyone who plays by my music. With that said, I won't even need to go that far down the road when there's laughing stock, old-cast users like Ed or Tony.

The newer generations have thick skin, don't take the site seriously and are reasonable.

Hah

Not "taking something seriously" is independent of if they can handle it or not. In one hand it can be a natural response, but in the other it's just an act of self-protection. They're also equally prone to tag along behaviors, but their bandwagon uses a slightly different fuel than the older one (a lot of old cast are converting their bandwagon towards the newer fuel though). 

This crowd you're celebrating are a large part of the "Why can't we all just get along?" infection, and I for one thought you'd be more against that than for it. They aren't "reasonable", they're conflict-avoidant and think they can just hover around watching others beef it instead of them, and unlike the old cast that were browbeaten into different forms of submission, many of the newer folk are too afraid to really get their hands dirty in the first place (even my cleaner kind of dirty). The older group was more of an open vector for wounds, which made them more inherently honest, while now we're dealing with a period of shrouding their jade and shade with memes. 

As I've said before, we're all participants of this freak circus, no one person here isn't a carnival attraction. 


TLDR; The new way is one of cowardice and deflection, while the old way was so triggered they couldn't help themselves. 

Old-cast Discord niggas are nothing like you described, nor are Edvard, Tony or you. You aren't even willing to post a nigress who acts like hot shit's dox, man. LMFAO Who are you to call others cowards and shit? Must've been a projection.

You do kinda remind me of a smarter version of Wilechaser. 

 How so? I've heard that name but didn't know the person well.

Posts: 32850
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...
Cawk said: 

I already know the place would survive with you taking said month hiatus, so I see no reason for you to bother, but that would at least be the "why". 

It would survive, no doubt. But have low activity, this is what I meant by "dead af": LOW ACTIVITY. 

When would you say SC had high activity? 

This is my territory and what I e-fought for for years. I changed S-C and it now even stands on different ground, it was all an elaborate plan disguised as attention whoring.

I think you'd stand to make more sense to people if you were more honest about how adaptive instead of rigid that your tactics and allegiances are. 

I did not lie when I wrote that I wanted to cause a change in SC. 

I dunno, this stinks of justification to me. 

What's wrong with your motives being about garnering attention or respect? 

Thanks for being so co-operative and staying despite having taken the obvious L with the whole CP spam war, which you have often called "facade" out of spite. Without you old-casts, there would be nobody left to ridicule.

The new cast isn't subject to your mockery? 

I get along with the "new-cast" or rather, SC inhabitants, with nearly if not all of them, just fine. 

My "closest to old-cast behavior" like Ed described me, will continue on. I don't have a reason to attack anyone who plays by my music. With that said, I won't even need to go that far down the road when there's laughing stock, old-cast users like Ed or Tony. 

I suppose the main difference here is a lack of personal investment from the newer people through a lack of exposure and different context. The new cast could be jarred just as readily as the old cast (if not many of them more so) over the same old issues if their environment and context enabled them to do so. 

The only way you'd really know if they were "playing by your music" would be to be a proper scourge again and see if they still like you down the line. The only ones who've been "truly tested" are those who actually had to deal with you over the years, and in a way I think those who are alright with you from old cast are the ones that at least somewhat get your tune (or they're doing that "y the dramah guise" fakery). 

New or Old here it's still common for us to have our heads up our own asses expressed largely through emotional contradictions, but what each group feels entitled to differs strongly based on the when. Those who joined later were not a part of many past chapters of drama, so the portions about you they're liable to focus on will instead be from their own timeline. 

In the end you don't really know how strong or weak the new peeps are, because you've yet to really test them. The values between the two aren't actually that different from each other, just their understanding of what the website's about. 

The newer generations have thick skin, don't take the site seriously and are reasonable.

Hah

Not "taking something seriously" is independent of if they can handle it or not. In one hand it can be a natural response, but in the other it's just an act of self-protection. They're also equally prone to tag along behaviors, but their bandwagon uses a slightly different fuel than the older one (a lot of old cast are converting their bandwagon towards the newer fuel though). 

This crowd you're celebrating are a large part of the "Why can't we all just get along?" infection, and I for one thought you'd be more against that than for it. They aren't "reasonable", they're conflict-avoidant and think they can just hover around watching others beef it instead of them, and unlike the old cast that were browbeaten into different forms of submission, many of the newer folk are too afraid to really get their hands dirty in the first place (even my cleaner kind of dirty). The older group was more of an open vector for wounds, which made them more inherently honest, while now we're dealing with a period of shrouding their jade and shade with memes. 

As I've said before, we're all participants of this freak circus, no one person here isn't a carnival attraction. 


TLDR; The new way is one of cowardice and deflection, while the old way was so triggered they couldn't help themselves. 

Old-cast Discord niggas are nothing like you described, nor are Edvard, Tony or you.

We weren't browbeaten into forms of submission that ultimately made most of us too jaded for real fighting, and therefor more open to accepting New-Cast avoidance tactics? The older group hasn't in many regards proven that they're willing to get their hands dirty when pushed (my cleaner kind or otherwise) by comparison to the new folk? The older group isn't an open vector for social woundings by comparison to the overly guarded new ways? The older group doesn't sell you "so triggered they can't help themselves"? 

Cool, I guess old cast is pretty buff then. 

You aren't even willing to post a nigress who acts like hot shit's dox, man. LMFAO Who are you to call others cowards and shit? Must've been a projection. 

I really thought you would have understood my explanation for why my way works, but I guess you even now still can't get it. 

Jim got it within a few posts. 

You do kinda remind me of a smarter version of Wilechaser. 

 How so? I've heard that name but didn't know the person well.

He had a lot of similar reasons to rebel against people from some similar tendencies for triggering and a similar reputation, but he was a lot more of a childish tantrumer than you are. He also had the "0 effort to be liked" compensation response thing, but his behavior unflinchingly sold childish and dumb instead of your angle towards appearing smart and daunting. 

You both expected to be seen as the bad guy because of who they are (as opposed to who you are purely), and as a result you both tried to fuck with the user base for some sense of personal fulfillment. The style exhibited by both has undercurrents of a socially defeatist mindset that stands to prove that they're above such constraints, but yeah, he'd respond more youthfully, like a young Sinister or TPG, purely through emotionally driven spam, while you've clearly taken a page out of Jim's tactics and prefer to sit there reminding us that you could do that at any time. From seeming young, Wilechaser did not have any poise walls, just reactivity. 

The rest of it's just a feeling, like a knee-jerk reaction mentally, which has no real bearing beyond explaining how I came to that conclusion. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 7/2/2019 8:49:36 PM
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: site would be dead af w...
Cawk said: 

I already know the place would survive with you taking said month hiatus, so I see no reason for you to bother, but that would at least be the "why". 

It would survive, no doubt. But have low activity, this is what I meant by "dead af": LOW ACTIVITY. 

When would you say SC had high activity? 

It's slow by my standards. 1/2, if not more of the front page are my topics. Imagine I posted nothing at all.

This is my territory and what I e-fought for for years. I changed S-C and it now even stands on different ground, it was all an elaborate plan disguised as attention whoring.

I think you'd stand to make more sense to people if you were more honest about how adaptive instead of rigid that your tactics and allegiances are. 

I did not lie when I wrote that I wanted to cause a change in SC. 

I dunno, this stinks of justification to me. 

What's wrong with your motives being about garnering attention or respect? 

It wouldn't be the truth.

Thanks for being so co-operative and staying despite having taken the obvious L with the whole CP spam war, which you have often called "facade" out of spite. Without you old-casts, there would be nobody left to ridicule.

The new cast isn't subject to your mockery? 

I get along with the "new-cast" or rather, SC inhabitants, with nearly if not all of them, just fine. 

My "closest to old-cast behavior" like Ed described me, will continue on. I don't have a reason to attack anyone who plays by my music. With that said, I won't even need to go that far down the road when there's laughing stock, old-cast users like Ed or Tony. 

I suppose the main difference here is a lack of personal investment from the newer people through a lack of exposure and different context. The new cast could be jarred just as readily as the old cast (if not many of them more so) over the same old issues if their environment and context enabled them to do so. 

The only way you'd really know if they were "playing by your music" would be to be a proper scourge again and see if they still like you down the line. The only ones who've been "truly tested" are those who actually had to deal with you over the years, and in a way I think those who are alright with you from old cast are the ones that at least somewhat get your tune (or they're doing that "y the dramah guise" fakery). 

New or Old here it's still common for us to have our heads up our own asses expressed largely through emotional contradictions, but what each group feels entitled to differs strongly based on the when. Those who joined later were not a part of many past chapters of drama, so the portions about you they're liable to focus on will instead be from their own timeline. 

In the end you don't really know how strong or weak the new peeps are, because you've yet to really test them. 

Nobody even objects pedophilia anymore, it's become the norm. Remember how people absolutely went off at you for the "CP: Illegal or Wrong?" topic you had posted? That wouldn't happen again.

There's 3 groups of users currently:

1. Those who bear with me.

2. Those who try not to get involved with me.

3. Those who despise me.

I'm fine with both #1 and #2, though I'd fuck over #2 (blanc, Inquirer, Tryptamine, etc.) if I could just for the drama as they don't serve another purpose to me. I mock #3 (Edvard, Tony, Sugar, etc.) for sports regularly.

I "test" users every day, whether in chat or topics. It doesn't matter who, I tell them what I think, and that in reckless ways, going full CAPS and/or swearing.

The newer generations have thick skin, don't take the site seriously and are reasonable.

Hah

Not "taking something seriously" is independent of if they can handle it or not. In one hand it can be a natural response, but in the other it's just an act of self-protection. They're also equally prone to tag along behaviors, but their bandwagon uses a slightly different fuel than the older one (a lot of old cast are converting their bandwagon towards the newer fuel though). 

This crowd you're celebrating are a large part of the "Why can't we all just get along?" infection, and I for one thought you'd be more against that than for it. They aren't "reasonable", they're conflict-avoidant and think they can just hover around watching others beef it instead of them, and unlike the old cast that were browbeaten into different forms of submission, many of the newer folk are too afraid to really get their hands dirty in the first place (even my cleaner kind of dirty). The older group was more of an open vector for wounds, which made them more inherently honest, while now we're dealing with a period of shrouding their jade and shade with memes. 

As I've said before, we're all participants of this freak circus, no one person here isn't a carnival attraction. 


TLDR; The new way is one of cowardice and deflection, while the old way was so triggered they couldn't help themselves. 

Old-cast Discord niggas are nothing like you described, nor are Edvard, Tony or you.

We weren't browbeaten into forms of submission that ultimately made most of us too jaded for real fighting, and therefor more open to accepting New-Cast avoidance tactics? The older group hasn't in many regards proven that they're willing to get their hands dirty when pushed (my cleaner kind or otherwise)? The older group isn't an open vector for social woundings by comparison to the overly guarded new ways? The older group doesn't sell you "so triggered they can't help themselves"? 

Cool, I guess old cast is pretty buff then. 

You aren't even willing to post a nigress who acts like hot shit's dox, man. LMFAO Who are you to call others cowards and shit? Must've been a projection. 

I really thought you would have understood my explanation for why my way works, but I guess you even now still can't get it. 

Jim got it within a few posts. 

You've made it clear you won't post it in order to seem trustworthy to new users.

If you really think posting her dox won't hurt her more than not posting it, even on long-term, you're delusional.

It's ok, TC. Let's do a reverse move of what they did to you: Slide it to me, I'll post it. LUL

10 / 14 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.