Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 36 posts
Posts: 2504
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions

Shit talk and lie about me all you want, but you need to stop shit talking my friend, she gets shit talked enough fuck you kiwi farms scum ragging on the disabled

🌬️
last edit on 1/25/2021 5:29:17 PM
Posts: 2504
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions

Thinks Chris Chan is a morally good person

What do you have against CWC? 

Thinks that her saying  (licks you ass) to , TC, Inq, myself, and Lena is ok, but when I play along and roleplay back, and get her to say (chews on cavs poop), somehow IM the one at fault for making it sexual.

She was mostly flipping out about you making it fecal, she's otherwise prone to making a lot of things sexual in spite of how it constitutes harassment.  

 No I was flipping out because I thought he was being funny with the poop shit like xadem or something and was just playing along as a joke and he thought I was literally flirting, I do not think of poop as being sexual yet they insist o was being sexual and flirting, it's the intention of the person that determines if it was flirting and I was NOT

🌬️
Posts: 32796
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions

So you can just lead people on with provocation and flirty words, but it's fine and totally not a problem if your intentions tell you it wasn't actually flirting? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 1669
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions

I think she's mostly mad at me because of how us flirting offends BR. She then tried to shift the blame from her to me, and that it was all my fault, (when in reality it's almost all her fault) so she would seem faithful. She got really mad when I told people that she was flirting as well. 

I'll second that she's very, very prone to sexual harassment. If both are playing the game it could be construed as flirting. 

 For once you actually make sense lol. We gotta talk on discord sometime. Who's your favorite CK3 ruler?

It's more about what I enjoy building than who I start as, but the Kushites have been very nice for forming my own religion, plus their holy sites are nice and clustered. 

My solo run for the time being's been over a Norse religion of Giants with: Warmonger, Hedonism, Cannibalism, and on my following run I plan to turn birth defects into a pandemic (especially combining Sterility with Carnal Exaltation), if not build a 'wise man' messiah faith where no one could hate my tyranny that involves sun worship. 

I enjoy Haesteinn from 867, because of his excellent military. Its really easy to just outright kill Charles and take over France.

Have you found any effective ways to push through the hurdle of converting away from Tribalism, or have you just been sticking to Feudalism from the start?

True, I usually stick with tribal, and don't build any buildings. There's not really an effective way.

There's a huge power hurdle to jump from that conversion that's instead had me stay backwards and tribal, turning down innovations entirely. If I absolutely have to advance, I have the option of combining The Norse with The French to make Normans, a combination of both discoveries and innovations, allowing them to do my research for me while I have a bunch of Tribal Berserkers wrecking everything. Sadly the Normans can't be Bersekers... which is yet one more reason to stay strong through being primitive. 

This is why I like Haesteinn. He starts off as feudal and could easily conquer a kingdom like France of Italy within 5 years of the start of the playthrough. And your knights can still get the berserker trait. After he dies you get a lot weaker though.


I've taken to starting as a tiny mass of land and expanding, emphasizing the Military and Learning stats to effectively make an army of Holy Paladins. Expanding your own religion's harder to do when you own a lot of territory and aren't the friendliest, so starting small with your faith and forcing it's expansion's proven more effective when it comes to religion. 

What do you run as your main stats usually? 

Usually learning or stewardship (wealth and learning focus) They seem like the strongest. Marshal (chivalery focus) when I'm starting off. Intrigue seems fun but I've never used too much of it. And diplo just seems meh.

Succession is awkward, though. I can't believe gavelkind is considered an "innovation".

They have 'currency' as a discovery, they're going the whole nine yards. 

Byzantines are always great because of primogeniture. It gwts rid of all the annoying succession stuff.

That does sound useful, but I've instead opted to vote in my successors using the Swedish method and disinherit the rest. 

Disinheriting costs renown though, which is really frustrating. Not that renown matters much, but it's just frustrating to "waste" a valuable resource.

Indians with elephantry allows you to amass knights, building a very high quality army that never runs out of supplies.

I usually just run my people into attrition and win anyway, but I have seen the advantages that follow superior supply lines. 

Posts: 32796
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions
Cavalier said:
Usually learning or stewardship (wealth and learning focus) They seem like the strongest. Marshal (chivalery focus) when I'm starting off. Intrigue seems fun but I've never used too much of it. And diplo just seems meh.

I've run all the stats so far, and while it is tempting to run Stewardship with Marshal for the money + army benefits that come from being able to hold more land than normal and more easily fund every aspect of a war (including troop numbers), I see too much value in building my own faith, plus the war benefits you get from the religious path are about half as good as picking Stewardship in it's place. It's only once you've founded your own faith, become the head of it, and have your own holy order of knights that it starts paying itself back, at which point you have tons of room to sprawl onto other stat builds. 

Diplomacy is the secret to deeper tyranny, and it allows you wiggle room with other faiths and cultures. It also makes it significantly easier to keep people in line, and the bonus to it makes the 'gift' option worth SIGNIFICANTLY more influence, gamebreakingly so. The options to form friends and shit's also invaluable. I tend to overlook the Diplomacy stat too, but when I've become a blood inheritor with a strong Diplo stat it's been pretty broken. 

For my run where I plan to pollute enemy bloodlines with sterility and birth defects, I'm figuring Intrigue mixed with Stewardship would be the most effective (with some mild Diplomacy splashed on). Intrigue can make you better at producing babies, better at murder and torture, make it possible for people to overlook attraction penalties... you should check it it's amazing. With this combination you can have Intrigue make up lies, then have Stewardship demand financial incentive to rid of those lies, then simply Fabricate more Hooks to extort even more gold. You can even with this combination easily usurp an Emperor's position, and with a high Intrigue stat you have more Scheme resistance. 

Mixing Intrigue and Diplomacy is stupid-effective, as you can now mix schemes with friendship. Mixing Intrigue with Marshal allows you to fight on two fronts: Key assassinations to grant military advantages, like assassinating their court's marshall to weaken their overall might, or assassinating their court's steward to hit them in the wallet, and one of the early lifestyle talents for Intrigue has torturing people grant you prowess and intrigue bonuses. 

The faith tenet 'Sacred Lies' has schemes actually reward you with Piety. 

Cavalier said:
Disinheriting costs renown though, which is really frustrating. Not that renown matters much, but it's just frustrating to "waste" a valuable resource.

Focus on having other members of your family birth lots of children then by pushing the Fecund and/or Attractiveness traits or something, maybe write a few Epics (there is a cap for population renown growth, but not titles). Having Emperors and Kings in your family line also gives you a nice bonus to it's rate of generation, and it still counts even if they have these titles within enemy armies. Placing a power hungry blood relative as a vassal on another entirely unrelated mass of land surrounded by enemies can lead to amazing results if the stats are good enough. 

Considering that you have an entire lifetime before you need to go for the disinherit action, you have more than enough time to save up a surplus. If it's otherwise really an issue just go for chaste traits or the celibacy talent within the learning lifestyle to stop yourself from generating renown detriments, maybe fuck some concubines or birth some bastards so that their children show your blood without having the right to your titles. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 1/25/2021 6:38:37 PM
Posts: 210
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions

So you can just lead people on with provocation and flirty words, but it's fine and totally not a problem if your intentions tell you it wasn't actually flirting? 

 14 thousand, 8 hundred and 50 posts!! Holy fucking shit. No wonder you had your knob cut off - the build up of stale cheese around your smelly unwashed bell end would have found its way into your blood stream and killed you off by now if you didn't. 🤮

What's next, swamp thing? You having all your teeth removed? 

Posts: 32796
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions
Slimey said: 

So you can just lead people on with provocation and flirty words, but it's fine and totally not a problem if your intentions tell you it wasn't actually flirting? 

14 thousand, 8 hundred and 50 posts!! Holy fucking shit.

This isn't even counting the number of posts I had from Luna's SC(s), nor Nabble. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 1/25/2021 6:50:46 PM
Posts: 2504
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions

So you can just lead people on with provocation and flirty words, but it's fine and totally not a problem if your intentions tell you it wasn't actually flirting? 

That's not leading people on and that's not what I did. I explained to this moron multiple times that I spam (licks xyz,s ass) to be funny and he still said it was flirting after that and also thought I took poop to be a sexual thing. Until you fix your damn site to show images that are posted, I'm not taking you seriously. (Licks turncoats ass) oh, I'm sorry, do you see that as me leading you on or wanting to fuck you? Nope. Just trying to be obnoxious. (Licks turncoats ass) in the meantime, stop your double speak. (Licks every single person on the planets ass)

🌬️
last edit on 1/25/2021 7:54:50 PM
Posts: 32796
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions

This could be construed as harassment. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2653
0 votes RE: List of Delora's Delusions

Well tbh, Cavs made it a big thing about how he's into scat play and how he gets off on women eating or rping about eating his shit so it's very likely that he did take you roleplaying with him as flirtation. 

It doesn't really matter what your intent with it was because you were still playing into it. If the persons intent commiting these actions really mattered, people going to HR and getting fired or suspended for sexual harassment wouldn't really be a thing. Tc and have already said we see you sexualizing us as sexual harassment because (licks ass) isn't 'not sexual'. 

It's about how you make others feel, and while yeah it's completely unfair that you should have to watch your actions with others while trying to be friendly with them sucks, doing things and rping things in a sexual way can be seen as flirtation

10 / 36 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.