Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

ddddddd said: 

Change frightens you? 

Change is great, but the speed of it has far less get done. It also makes it a lot easier to not actually listen when what's being said's only showing like 13 lines of chat at a time without scrolling. 

The sense of permanence with forum posting has it stay there, resonating with the readers even if someone spams nonsense following it. It's easier to quote and refer to, and rather than a constant fight for dominance of quantity it becomes a matter of quality and clarification. 

 Says the guy that fills every post he has with paragraphs of pseudologic

I can tell who is and isn't reading it usually through how they respond. 

 Why do you expect people to read your posts when you say so much low quality garbage?

Quality's relative, and I get enough pats on the back for it to counteract this strike of yours. 

At first glance, you seem smart. And then the logical loopholes become apparent.

Like which?

 Like your racism. Your pats on the back are because of your big words and paragraphs that no one bothers to read. People that actually pay attention don't think so.

There's a difference between the "wow you're so smart"/"you're not as smart at you think"s, and the people questioning portions of the narrative in ways that show they were focusing. 

I've thrown in nonsense sentences mid-rant before to see if anyone'd pick it out, like a litmus test for their focus and capacity. 

Turncoat said: 

There's a difference between the "wow you're so smart"/"you're not as smart at you think"s, and the people questioning portions of the narrative in ways that show they were focusing. 

I've thrown in nonsense sentences mid-rant before to see if anyone'd pick it out, like a litmus test for their focus and capacity. 

 You have so much nonsense that I dont have time to respond to all of them tbh. If you reread my replies to you, you'll notice plenty of examples of me picking apart your logical fallacies.

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

There's a difference between the "wow you're so smart"/"you're not as smart at you think"s, and the people questioning portions of the narrative in ways that show they were focusing. 

I've thrown in nonsense sentences mid-rant before to see if anyone'd pick it out, like a litmus test for their focus and capacity. 

 You have so much nonsense that I dont have time to respond to all of them tbh. If you reread my replies to you, you'll notice plenty of examples of me picking apart your logical fallacies.

You likely just can't comprehend it from it being leagues beyond your ability, as I have addressed your strikes over fallacy but I guess that, too, was dropped from being too heavy to hold. 

It's fine though, not everyone's meant to get it, in fact missing points is often how you find newer conclusions. If you understood what I understood, you wouldn't be 'you' anymore. 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

There's a difference between the "wow you're so smart"/"you're not as smart at you think"s, and the people questioning portions of the narrative in ways that show they were focusing. 

I've thrown in nonsense sentences mid-rant before to see if anyone'd pick it out, like a litmus test for their focus and capacity. 

 You have so much nonsense that I dont have time to respond to all of them tbh. If you reread my replies to you, you'll notice plenty of examples of me picking apart your logical fallacies.

You likely just can't comprehend it from it being leagues beyond your ability, as I have addressed your strikes over fallacy but I guess that, too, was dropped from being too heavy to hold. 

It's fine though, not everyone's meant to get it, in fact missing points is often how you find newer conclusions. If you understood what I understood, you wouldn't be 'you' anymore. 

 The narc rage begins. Got anything else?

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

There's a difference between the "wow you're so smart"/"you're not as smart at you think"s, and the people questioning portions of the narrative in ways that show they were focusing. 

I've thrown in nonsense sentences mid-rant before to see if anyone'd pick it out, like a litmus test for their focus and capacity. 

 You have so much nonsense that I dont have time to respond to all of them tbh. If you reread my replies to you, you'll notice plenty of examples of me picking apart your logical fallacies.

You likely just can't comprehend it from it being leagues beyond your ability, as I have addressed your strikes over fallacy but I guess that, too, was dropped from being too heavy to hold. 

It's fine though, not everyone's meant to get it, in fact missing points is often how you find newer conclusions. If you understood what I understood, you wouldn't be 'you' anymore. 

 The narc rage begins. Got anything else?

Considering that you don't even try to argue against it, not really. 

I'll take this as you admitting defeat, looking for a way to worm out of circumstances rather than attempt to grasp the material. I both do and don't blame you for it, doing so over your lack of a willingness to try and not doing so over how it's a big mountain to climb. 

When you're more willing to try, we can have an actual discussion, but as long as you stay at the edges like this afraid of a public confrontation where you may end up overstepping your boundaries we aren't going to get much further. 

"In order to raise your sword, you must first lower your shield."

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

There's a difference between the "wow you're so smart"/"you're not as smart at you think"s, and the people questioning portions of the narrative in ways that show they were focusing. 

I've thrown in nonsense sentences mid-rant before to see if anyone'd pick it out, like a litmus test for their focus and capacity. 

 You have so much nonsense that I dont have time to respond to all of them tbh. If you reread my replies to you, you'll notice plenty of examples of me picking apart your logical fallacies.

You likely just can't comprehend it from it being leagues beyond your ability, as I have addressed your strikes over fallacy but I guess that, too, was dropped from being too heavy to hold. 

It's fine though, not everyone's meant to get it, in fact missing points is often how you find newer conclusions. If you understood what I understood, you wouldn't be 'you' anymore. 

 The narc rage begins. Got anything else?

Considering that you don't even try to argue against it, not really. 

I'll take this as you admitting defeat, looking for a way to worm out of circumstances rather than attempt to grasp the material. I both do and don't blame you for it, doing so over your lack of a willingness to try and not doing so over how it's a big mountain to climb. 

When you're more willing to try, we can have an actual discussion, but as long as you stay at the edges like this afraid of a public confrontation where you may end up overstepping your boundaries we aren't going to get much further. 

"In order to raise your sword, you must first lower your shield."

 "not really"

*proceeds to write 2 paragraphs*

Its not really about winning or losing. Its that I dont want to waste my time arguing with a narcissist that spews illogical bs. Correcting you will push you to be more defensive and illogical.

Cavalier said: 

 Says the guy that fills every post he has with paragraphs of pseudologic

 Leave TC alone. He has his degree in psychology now, so if he wants to think he's Sigmund Freud - that's his perogative XD

Slimey said: 

Cavalier said: 

 Says the guy that fills every post he has with paragraphs of pseudologic

 Leave TC alone. He has his degree in psychology now, so if he wants to think he's Sigmund Freud - that's his perogative XD

 I definitely struck his chord. He's not even using pseudologic anymore, just thinly veiled insultsm XD

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

There's a difference between the "wow you're so smart"/"you're not as smart at you think"s, and the people questioning portions of the narrative in ways that show they were focusing. 

I've thrown in nonsense sentences mid-rant before to see if anyone'd pick it out, like a litmus test for their focus and capacity. 

 You have so much nonsense that I dont have time to respond to all of them tbh. If you reread my replies to you, you'll notice plenty of examples of me picking apart your logical fallacies.

You likely just can't comprehend it from it being leagues beyond your ability, as I have addressed your strikes over fallacy but I guess that, too, was dropped from being too heavy to hold. 

It's fine though, not everyone's meant to get it, in fact missing points is often how you find newer conclusions. If you understood what I understood, you wouldn't be 'you' anymore. 

 The narc rage begins. Got anything else?

Considering that you don't even try to argue against it, not really. 

I'll take this as you admitting defeat, looking for a way to worm out of circumstances rather than attempt to grasp the material. I both do and don't blame you for it, doing so over your lack of a willingness to try and not doing so over how it's a big mountain to climb. 

When you're more willing to try, we can have an actual discussion, but as long as you stay at the edges like this afraid of a public confrontation where you may end up overstepping your boundaries we aren't going to get much further. 

"In order to raise your sword, you must first lower your shield."

 "not really"

*proceeds to write 2 paragraphs*

It'd be empty without a closing statement, don't you agree? 

I see you backpeddling out and I thought I'd show you the door with a little complimentary advice. 

Its not really about winning or losing. Its that I dont want to waste my time arguing with a narcissist that spews illogical bs. Correcting you will push you to be more defensive and illogical.

Then why are you spending so much time on it?