Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

I'm pretty androgynous tho:)

The parts of yourself you emphasize are mostly fem, but how you do it is somewhat aggressive. 

I'd still mostly lump that in with femininity, as fems being "secondary" is mostly a symptom of cultural conditioning. 

boss ass bitch:p

What's wrong with calling you a liberated woman? 

 I like being the boss lol but I am a free spirit as long as i am able to act on that then I feel liberated yes:)

Turncoat said: 

Add on top of that aspects of individual reputation (like how Ed can appeal to the cameos of old cast still) and having accusations work as establishing statements (defending yourself and not addressing the point can both sell that the original accuser was right) and gullibility becomes more of an expectation. 

 

Edvard is a joke, really. Somebody, whose name shall not be mentioned, asked me for advice on how they could make Edvard send them money. XD

The old-cast left for the most part, some hang out on Discord but are irrelevant around here. What's for sure is Edvard does not have the amount of influence on the site anymore as he used to have.

If you want to see how rampantly gullibility's been able to run here (and CC), check the Jim + CS drama's peanut galleries. A few too many people were fully ready to accept some nutty stories as truth simply because neither of them corrected them. They didn't even need proof. This in many respects has shown me that more people seem gullible as opposed to less, that those who aren't gullible are the ones more worth focusing on.

Who believed Jim was drugging CS and holding her captive? Delora came up with the whole story out of nowhere, she's primarily psychotic I'd say, but likely gullible too. Bohemian played along/proved her wrong to calm her crazy ass down. PalePeach believed it, I don't remember if anyone else did.

Jim's/CS' case proves my point further.

TLDR; If they aren't willing to put in the effort, they're easier to push through less-than legitimate means. 

 Being apathetic =/= gullible.

I can't think of 1 currently regular male member who's gullible.

SC has had naive ones, such as TheSocio and Cadaver, but they weren't gullible. They were normies and weeded out by SC's natural selection, as it should be.

aubrieta said: 

lol im not really a trannie cawk i was joking in that other thread. not that I have anything against trannies especially not lovely ones like tc:) 

 I don't think you're gullible.

Cawk said: 

aubrieta said: 

lol im not really a trannie cawk i was joking in that other thread. not that I have anything against trannies especially not lovely ones like tc:) 

 I don't think you're gullible.

 oh thank you:)

Cawk said:

Being apathetic =/= gullible.

You see, that's just it; I wouldn't say it's all apathy. Only a few people here actually accomplish it genuinely while the vast majority try to force it in one way or another. 

It's in how they try to force it that allows them to be open towards said gullibility. 

SC has had naive ones, but they weren't gullible.

Definitely more naive than gullible, but I'd still say gullibility's pretty high here. Maybe less blatant from some who don't want to look incorrect, but they will still carry the ideas and show that off in smaller ways. 

Who believed Jim was drugging CS and holding her captive?

A few too many people... 

It's like as if their research criteria was just over which they'd prefer to believe. 

 Drop some names then TC

Good said: 

 Drop some names then TC

Beg me. 

you're the ones who are gullible 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

 Drop some names then TC

Beg me. 

I only beg hot women in leather with a whip in their hands

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

 Drop some names then TC

Beg me. 

I only beg hot women in leather with a whip in their hands

Whips tho?