CS
Loona
Blanc
PalePeach
Scarlett
What do they have in common?
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
They're all women.
The more straight forward ones who don't like things that seem "too complicated" or "too slow" to them are an easy gateway for gullibility through their room for blunders. I'd say this is largely unisex but I swear the males ask sliiiightly less questions and otherwise try to default towards "neutral" with people more often (which allows them to be repeatedly used).
If they've made a habit out of complaining about how much they dislike indirect forms of communication, they likely resent it for a reason.
TLDR is high octane fuel for bandwagons, and people who don't want to work hard (and are overall less "invested"), if they aren't completely reclused anyway, are the most easily steered. Add on top of that aspects of individual reputation (like how Ed can appeal to the cameos of old cast still) and having accusations work as establishing statements (defending yourself and not addressing the point can both sell that the original accuser was right) and gullibility becomes more of an expectation.
If you want to see how rampantly gullibility's been able to run here (and CC), check the Jim + CS drama's peanut galleries. A few too many people were fully ready to accept some nutty stories as truth simply because neither of them corrected them. They didn't even need proof. This in many respects has shown me that more people seem gullible as opposed to less, that those who aren't gullible are the ones more worth focusing on.
TLDR; If they aren't willing to put in the effort, they're easier to push through less-than legitimate means.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
6/27/2019 1:38:15 AM
They didn't even need proof.
Inquirer proof?
A shadow not so dark.
I'm pretty androgynous tho:)
The parts of yourself you emphasize are mostly fem, but how you do it is somewhat aggressive.
I'd still mostly lump that in with femininity, as fems being "secondary" is mostly a symptom of cultural conditioning.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
I'm pretty androgynous tho:)
The parts of yourself you emphasize are mostly fem, but how you do it is somewhat aggressive.
I'd still mostly lump that in with femininity, as fems being "secondary" is mostly a symptom of cultural conditioning.
boss ass bitch:p
What's wrong with calling you a liberated woman?
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔