Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 20 posts
0 votes

New social hierarchy of SC will be decided with the election


Posts: 5402

People who abstained from voting in election poll are automatically at the bottom of the barrel, alongside blanc

Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...

I never vote in those stupid things lol

I posted my prediction on the thread  :P

Posts: 2479
1 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...

Wow this is not fair to violent felons at all.

Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...
Xena said: 

I never vote in those stupid things lol

I posted my prediction on the thread  :P

You posted your prediction two hours ago, and as such have been disqualified. Even if you had voted, it wouldn't have mattered. Voting was possible BEFORE the election only. 

Your ignorance on US politics is as vast as a Saharan bedouin's curly black haired arse. 

Posts: 33591
0 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...

It'd be something else if the mail-in ballots give Trump an unexpected edge. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...
Xadem said: 
Xena said: 

I never vote in those stupid things lol

I posted my prediction on the thread  :P

You posted your prediction two hours ago, and as such have been disqualified. Even if you had voted, it wouldn't have mattered. Voting was possible BEFORE the election only. 

Your ignorance on US politics is as vast as a Saharan bedouin's curly black haired arse. 

 lol I posted my prediction in chat around this time yesterday.

I only bothered with your silly thread bc you edgy socios are so ridiculously conservative it's almost like trolling to tell you we're libs

Posts: 33591
0 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...
Xena said: 
Xadem said: 
Xena said: 

I never vote in those stupid things lol

I posted my prediction on the thread  :P

You posted your prediction two hours ago, and as such have been disqualified. Even if you had voted, it wouldn't have mattered. Voting was possible BEFORE the election only. 

Your ignorance on US politics is as vast as a Saharan bedouin's curly black haired arse. 

 lol I posted my prediction in chat around this time yesterday.

I only bothered with your silly thread bc you edgy socios are so ridiculously conservative it's almost like trolling to tell you we're libs

What proportion of this website do you figure leans right as opposed to left? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 3222
0 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...

It'd be something else if the mail-in ballots give Trump an unexpected edge. 

 If they do or not Trump will still battle the ballots that are being counted after the deadline.

Mail in voters were told the deadline to send their ballots, those who followed suit had their mail in ballots counted. That's how it's always been. 

Posts: 33591
0 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...

It'd be something else if the mail-in ballots give Trump an unexpected edge. 

 If they do or not Trump will still battle the ballots that are being counted after the deadline.

I mean he figures that, no matter what, if he doesn't win then it must be fraud. He expressed the same at the end of the 2016 election right before he won, planning for TrumpTV as his consolation prize to ignore the shame of losing after someone gave him a scare about Russia and China's room to rig our votes (yet Trump chose to cancel the voter fraud investigation after he won, convenient). If he loses initially, then a recount is necessary to undo the corruption, while if he wins then he'll insist instead that they don't do a recount so that the left won't "steal it"

Like a classic narc, he's framed it where it's only corruption if he loses, regardless of how it happens. It's using convenient narratives to defend against the potential ego damages, even if said narratives have the room to sweep him towards places he didn't prepare for later. He's also quick to suspect others are cheating from it being his own M.O.

Mail in voters were told the deadline to send their ballots, those who followed suit had their mail in ballots counted. That's how it's always been. 

There's been reports of Trump supporter printing companies running out of mail-in ballots from having not thought to print enough, and there's all sorts of other rigmarole being thrown forward to slow down if not stop people. 

Having more time's better in the long run, it means we can be more thorough. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 11/5/2020 12:38:55 AM
Posts: 2647
1 votes RE: New social hierarchy of...
Xena said: 
Xadem said: 
Xena said: 

I never vote in those stupid things lol

I posted my prediction on the thread  :P

You posted your prediction two hours ago, and as such have been disqualified. Even if you had voted, it wouldn't have mattered. Voting was possible BEFORE the election only. 

Your ignorance on US politics is as vast as a Saharan bedouin's curly black haired arse. 

 lol I posted my prediction in chat around this time yesterday.

I only bothered with your silly thread bc you edgy socios are so ridiculously conservative it's almost like trolling to tell you we're libs

What proportion of this website do you figure leans right as opposed to left? 

 2/3 to 3/4 at least.

You're a Dem, MissC is a Liberal. Teeps is ultra right wing, WW vascillates wildly between left and right like any creature who's had its wings pulled off... The Swedes usually lean social democrat bc they're Swedes, but I'm assuming you only mean the Americans, right?

I'm too lazy to list them all lol

Gimme a list of active American members and I'll tell you what their political stripes are.

10 / 20 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.