Leak it anonymously, if you know how. I'm pretty interested actually you make it seem like they just discovered how to hyperdrive in space.They said the patent is publicly available to read. It's just that nobody except the patent holders can realise it.
Bruh. Can you link it Crim?
No because then some faggot would inform the company holding the patent that someone is being a sneaky snake behind their backs
What would you dispute exactly? Ownership? They own the patent.
If you mean to go public with someone else's patent, prepare for lawsuits. You'd be sacrificing yourself for your idealism.
I would dispute the legality of the patent. No one should own logical conclusions. This is, it's like trying to patent data trees or fucking flow charts, but just a bit more technical.
you can dispute patents, and I think I could explain things in a simplified way fairly well, I would have a very strong case.
Leak it anonymously, if you know how. I'm pretty interested actually you make it seem like they just discovered how to hyperdrive in space.They said the patent is publicly available to read. It's just that nobody except the patent holders can realise it.
Bruh. Can you link it Crim?
No because then some faggot would inform the company holding the patent that someone is being a sneaky snake behind their backs
Tiny chance but her choice
What would you dispute exactly? Ownership? They own the patent.
If you mean to go public with someone else's patent, prepare for lawsuits. You'd be sacrificing yourself for your idealism.
I would dispute the legality of the patent. No one should own logical conclusions. This is, it's like trying to patent data trees or fucking flow charts, but just a bit more technical.
you can dispute patents, and I think I could explain things in a simplified way fairly well, I would have a very strong case.
If it's purely ethical, it really is up to you. Life is short so whichever way you decide to go should be the one you don't regret
What would you dispute exactly? Ownership? They own the patent.
If you mean to go public with someone else's patent, prepare for lawsuits. You'd be sacrificing yourself for your idealism.
I would dispute the legality of the patent. No one should own logical conclusions. This is, it's like trying to patent data trees or fucking flow charts, but just a bit more technical.
you can dispute patents, and I think I could explain things in a simplified way fairly well, I would have a very strong case.
If it's purely ethical, it really is up to you. Life is short so whichever way you decide to go should be the one you don't regret
I wonder if you'll end up on the news if you actually did it. Then we'd all know who you are
What would you dispute exactly? Ownership? They own the patent.
If you mean to go public with someone else's patent, prepare for lawsuits. You'd be sacrificing yourself for your idealism.
I would dispute the legality of the patent. No one should own logical conclusions. This is, it's like trying to patent data trees or fucking flow charts, but just a bit more technical.
you can dispute patents, and I think I could explain things in a simplified way fairly well, I would have a very strong case.
If it's purely ethical, it really is up to you. Life is short so whichever way you decide to go should be the one you don't regret
I wonder if you'll end up on the news if you actually did it. Then we'd all know who you are
She said it's a fundamental invention. So maybe it's a device to make you less of a fucking faggot?
What would you dispute exactly? Ownership? They own the patent.
If you mean to go public with someone else's patent, prepare for lawsuits. You'd be sacrificing yourself for your idealism.
I would dispute the legality of the patent. No one should own logical conclusions. This is, it's like trying to patent data trees or fucking flow charts, but just a bit more technical.
you can dispute patents, and I think I could explain things in a simplified way fairly well, I would have a very strong case.
If it's purely ethical, it really is up to you. Life is short so whichever way you decide to go should be the one you don't regret
I wonder if you'll end up on the news if you actually did it. Then we'd all know who you are
I'm secretly Trump, thanks for betting on me kid :)))
What would you dispute exactly? Ownership? They own the patent.
If you mean to go public with someone else's patent, prepare for lawsuits. You'd be sacrificing yourself for your idealism.
I would dispute the legality of the patent. No one should own logical conclusions. This is, it's like trying to patent data trees or fucking flow charts, but just a bit more technical.
you can dispute patents, and I think I could explain things in a simplified way fairly well, I would have a very strong case.
If it's purely ethical, it really is up to you. Life is short so whichever way you decide to go should be the one you don't regret
I wonder if you'll end up on the news if you actually did it. Then we'd all know who you are
I'm secretly Trump, thanks for betting on me kid :)))
Looks like you have it in the bag, just don't fuck it up now...
