For the US, ever since gay marriage passed so too has the perception of which side has 'power' (the switch from "In God We Trust" to "PC Culture"). As a result, similar to when women and races gained increased rights, corporate interests have shifted in order to keep their pockets full, so said corporate interests will usually reflect as sellouts towards the politics of the time. It's like how our presidents still can't claim to be anything but Christian; if they don't reflect the times they'll be left behind by them.
I mostly see you blaming The Jews for being rich winners that don't want to share their wealth (yet you ignore groups like the Skull & Bones Society or Freemasons), and I see you attacking 'Choice' groups as if they'd be just as non-inclusive.
When it comes to "sides", I tend to prefer whichever side allows further Freedom/'Degeneracy' when it comes to the individual, as while antifascist action is arguably fascist in it's own right their overall message is one of allowing people to make (questionable) choices. Effectively, the censor in leftist hands wants to remove message power from people who'd try to tell others how to live, while the right meanwhile doesn't like being told what they can and can't say. They both desire a platform to speak on uninterrupted but see what the other is doing as repressive. It's always been this way, but the perception of power has shifted.
TLDR; The "Jewish Problem" when it comes to what's current is just a mirror of corporate wishy washy choices of convenience framed within a history of culturally safeguarded wealth, and what they're responding to is a shift in power from the right to the left just like what everyone else with money is doing right now.