Sociopath Community

A coalition of non elected economic powerhouses are what runs this world and they have done so for the last 150 years. They are the single greatest enemy to human innovation, prosperity and way of life. And they are sick demented people who are religiously warped around hedonism. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. 

There is an entire wave of media that trys to convey and warn about this force subtly but it was heard on deaf ears. 

Kestrel said: 

A coalition of non elected economic powerhouses are what runs this world and they have done so for the last 150 years. They are the single greatest enemy to human innovation, prosperity and way of life. And they are sick demented people who are religiously warped around hedonism. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. 

There is an entire wave of media that trys to convey and warn about this force subtly but it was heard on deaf ears. 

It's a scapegoat to ignore Capitalism. 

all you have to do is buy stocks, then you can become one of the evil "Big Business" owners.

evil Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, evil

Turncoat said: 

Kestrel said: 

A coalition of non elected economic powerhouses are what runs this world and they have done so for the last 150 years. They are the single greatest enemy to human innovation, prosperity and way of life. And they are sick demented people who are religiously warped around hedonism. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. 

There is an entire wave of media that trys to convey and warn about this force subtly but it was heard on deaf ears. 

It's a scapegoat to ignore Capitalism. 

 I give plenty of blame to capitalism. It's why I advocate fascism. The inevitable death of every democracy is a corporate shadow aristocracy. 

As far as the Jews go, I had some questions about it. My main one was that if "DA JOOZ" was real it'd be an unprecedented amount of coordination over centuries and across the planet. It's true. They're bonded by both blood and religion to pursue these goals. They're highly nepotistic and in their religious doctrine quite clearly explains non jews(gentiles) are to be extorted, exploited and manipulated like cattle to achieve their ends. They are literally a manipulative might makes right religion, it's canon in their religion for a Rabbi to out word God.

And it shows not only in their repeated expulsions in over 100 countries for trying to subvert governments but in their duality in politics today. They radically push ideas they wont harbor in their own borders and have asserted themselves as a socially immune group despite being such a disproportionately large holder of power for their size

Also, the Nazis have real reasons to hate the Jews as they did. I'm not sure what your knowledge of post WW1 Germany was, the conditions of the weimar republic and the communist civil war started by Jews. 

holmes said: 

all you have to do is buy stocks, then you can become one of the evil "Big Business" owners.

Stock owners are just a symptom. 

Kestrel said: 

Turncoat said: 

Kestrel said: 

A coalition of non elected economic powerhouses are what runs this world and they have done so for the last 150 years. They are the single greatest enemy to human innovation, prosperity and way of life. And they are sick demented people who are religiously warped around hedonism. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. 

There is an entire wave of media that trys to convey and warn about this force subtly but it was heard on deaf ears. 

It's a scapegoat to ignore Capitalism. 

I give plenty of blame to capitalism. It's why I advocate fascism.

That's the mistake then. 

Fascism will utilize capitalism once it's in their hands again, just like any other party. The truly 'counter-culture' view opposes the tools as opposed to "the enemy that uses them", as otherwise you risk becoming the very people you're fighting. 

Antifascism is itself inherently fascist other than it's promise of the choices that fascism doesn't offer. Fascism says "be like this", while anti-fascism simply says "don't be what they tell you to be", but what's making the modern times weird is over how the Left's once counter-culture views are now culture, while the views that once predominated society now feel like the minority. 

The inevitable death of every democracy is a corporate shadow aristocracy. 

Democracy has always been the illusion to keep other interests going. The only change in the present age is over how transparent it's become. 

Roger Stone is already out of jail to help fight against the current Biden campaign. Money and connections win, and it's not about sides beyond immediate convenience and invested history. 

As far as the Jews go, I had some questions about it. My main one was that if "DA JOOZ" was real it'd be an unprecedented amount of coordination over centuries and across the planet. It's true. They're bonded by both blood and religion to pursue these goals.

I will admit that they're a lot more self-segregationalist than a lot of other cultural choices, but any collection of people who want to reflect a sense of history is going to appear this pushy. 

They're highly nepotistic and in their religious doctrine quite clearly explains non jews(gentiles) are to be extorted, exploited and manipulated like cattle to achieve their ends.

To what ends though varies, a lot. Any organization that has persisted through time is going to have hardened rhetoric. 

Many instead see it as fine to never "show their secrets" to such people, to let them live uninformed lives. For those who choose to simply never have other people embrace their ideals, are they really political criminals? 

They are literally a manipulative might makes right religion, it's canon in their religion for a Rabbi to out word God.

A lot have left Jewish faiths over how organized they'd want their marriages to otherwise be, over how groupthink their local variant of the culture has shown itself to be. 

This does not make Judaism wrong, but it shows flaws if their own people are questioning how rigid the structure is, as would make sense for any rigid structure. 

And it shows not only in their repeated expulsions in over 100 countries for trying to subvert governments but in their duality in politics today. They radically push ideas they wont harbor in their own borders and have asserted themselves as a socially immune group despite being such a disproportionately large holder of power for their size

So your point is simply over how enough of them are financially successful enough to push others? 

If others were doing as well as they were, would you expect them to not tug at the strings? To say it's all "The Jews" is stupid, but to say "The Jews have nothing to do with this" is ignorant too. Obviously they have ties in the right places, and obviously their faith has quite the self-centered focus, but looking at a few winners and judging the entire faith on it is just observing how one is doing better than others, not if one is right or wrong. It's just responding to the power struggle instead of the ideology. 

Turncoat said: 

I will admit that they're a lot more self-segregationalist than a lot of other cultural choices, but any collection of people who want to reflect a sense of history is going to appear this pushy. 

Not quite as much as the Jews. They literally are reaffirmed by the two largest religions in the world and their own that they are God's chosen people. They're a very inclusive group and see it as their birth right to exploit others. In their doctrine it states that at some point in their biblical timeline every Jew will have 2800 gentile slaves. They have no problem guiding you because they truly believe it's their place to.

They're highly nepotistic and in their religious doctrine quite clearly explains non jews(gentiles) are to be extorted, exploited and manipulated like cattle to achieve their ends.

To what ends though varies, a lot. Anything organization that has persisted through time is going to have hardened rhetoric. 

Many instead see it as fine to never "show their secrets" to such people, to let them live uninformed lives. For those who choose to simply never have other people embrace their ideals, are they really political criminals? 

I'm not sure what entirely you're getting at here, but I would say it's very odd Judaism forbids outsiders from knowing Jewish intent. And that Jews actively try to hire other Jews in mass. 

They are literally a manipulative might makes right religion, it's canon in their religion for a Rabbi to out word God.

A lot have left Jewish faiths over how organized they'd want their marriages to otherwise be, over how groupthink their local variant of the culture has shown itself to be. 

This does not make Judaism wrong, but it shows flaws if their own people are questioning how rigid the structure is, as would make sense for any rigid structure. 

Not every Jew is like this. But it's the billionaire Jews at the top, already corrupted by power that take it to a whole other level. Imagine being born into more wealth than your grand children could spend and raised to believe you are God's chosen people to rule over others.

And it shows not only in their repeated expulsions in over 100 countries for trying to subvert governments but in their duality in politics today. They radically push ideas they wont harbor in their own borders and have asserted themselves as a socially immune group despite being such a disproportionately large holder of power for their size

So your point is simply over how enough of them are financially successful enough to push others? 

If others were doing as well as they were, would you expect them to not tug at the strings? To say it's all "The Jews" is stupid, but to say "The Jews have nothing to do with this" is ignorant too. Obviously they have ties in the right places, and obviously their faith has quite the self-centered focus, but looking at a few winners and judging the entire faith on it is just observing how one is doing better than others, not if one is right or wrong. It's just responding to the power struggle instead of the ideology. 

 It's all the Jews. If you aren't a Jew, you play ball with them, you dont go against their interest and by proxy you are an extension of them. They are the biggest stick and have been for sometime.

Kestrel said: 

Turncoat said: 

I will admit that they're a lot more self-segregationalist than a lot of other cultural choices, but any collection of people who want to reflect a sense of history is going to appear this pushy. 

Not quite as much as the Jews.

I just see a combination of historically ingrained racism and power, and it's validity is left questionable over how easily they're made to be a scapegoat (maybe they do it too as fake anti-Jews as to enable others pitying their group, who's to say). Give that same power to other -ists though and it'd just change the flavor of the same food, as at it's core it's just about what's believed while in a position of power. 

I see the "enemies of the Jews" exaggerating a lot of claims, but there are environmental ties to one's racial history that reflect pre-equality, the notions of "Old Money" that give their next generations room to thrive differently, and that's going to take decades to peel off. To deny that would be like denying decades of wealth disparity between white and black people in the US, there's obviously money divides between different groups that are tied into one's racial history as a matter of the history of their environment despite the leaps and bounds that have otherwise been made in accordance to racial equality.

Effectively, they did well enough in history as a race that others can disguise the problems of wealth and class as if it were a racial matter purely. In new hands, wealth and class wouldn't work too differently, so I reiterate that it's worth focusing more on the tools than the users of said tools. 

They literally are reaffirmed by the two largest religions in the world and their own that they are God's chosen people.

Every religion thinks they're chosen unless they think they're anti-chosen, which is honestly the same thing when it comes to self-indulgence potential. 

We aren't shit, they aren't shit, what matters is where the money and titles are labeled as belonging. In another's hands I doubt it'd really be that different, and when you look into where their names extend it tends to be closer to media and businesses centered around places where their population is higher. 

They're a very inclusive group and see it as their birth right to exploit others.

Are we seeing that word differently or something? From what I've seen they don't want to include anyone who isn't blood-related, similar to Native American self-segregation. 

In their doctrine it states that at some point in their biblical timeline every Jew will have 2800 gentile slaves. They have no problem guiding you because they truly believe it's their place to.

Anything in a faith that claims bizarre numbers doesn't carry weight to me beyond how much the person believes in it. 

They're highly nepotistic and in their religious doctrine quite clearly explains non jews(gentiles) are to be extorted, exploited and manipulated like cattle to achieve their ends.

To what ends though varies, a lot. Anything organization that has persisted through time is going to have hardened rhetoric. 

Many instead see it as fine to never "show their secrets" to such people, to let them live uninformed lives. For those who choose to simply never have other people embrace their ideals, are they really political criminals? 

I'm not sure what entirely you're getting at here, but I would say it's very odd Judaism forbids outsiders from knowing Jewish intent. And that Jews actively try to hire other Jews in mass. 

What secretive group wants 'outsiders' to know what's going on? There's multiple that make faith bait out of perceived secrecy (like Freemasons, and Scientology), and their entire charm is over how your bloodline or membership entitles you to certain secrets that effectively lock you in as if you owed them for your own sunken investment. 

They are literally a manipulative might makes right religion, it's canon in their religion for a Rabbi to out word God.

A lot have left Jewish faiths over how organized they'd want their marriages to otherwise be, over how groupthink their local variant of the culture has shown itself to be. 

This does not make Judaism wrong, but it shows flaws if their own people are questioning how rigid the structure is, as would make sense for any rigid structure. 

Not every Jew is like this. But it's the billionaire Jews at the top, already corrupted by power that take it to a whole other level. Imagine being born into more wealth than your grand children could spend and raised to believe you are God's chosen people to rule over others.

Give this wealth to another organized 'race' and it wouldn't be that different. We have an understanding of what strategies move sheep, do you expect that those tactics moving into another's hands would lead to a difference in policy beyond their immediate concerns and aesthetic? 

We need to address the tools, they're the problem. It's not like they're the only ones trying to steer people right now. 

And it shows not only in their repeated expulsions in over 100 countries for trying to subvert governments but in their duality in politics today. They radically push ideas they wont harbor in their own borders and have asserted themselves as a socially immune group despite being such a disproportionately large holder of power for their size

So your point is simply over how enough of them are financially successful enough to push others? 

If others were doing as well as they were, would you expect them to not tug at the strings? To say it's all "The Jews" is stupid, but to say "The Jews have nothing to do with this" is ignorant too. Obviously they have ties in the right places, and obviously their faith has quite the self-centered focus, but looking at a few winners and judging the entire faith on it is just observing how one is doing better than others, not if one is right or wrong. It's just responding to the power struggle instead of the ideology. 

It's all the Jews. If you aren't a Jew, you play ball with them, you dont go against their interest and by proxy you are an extension of them. They are the biggest stick and have been for sometime.

I've noticed you pushing this "If you accept their label, you're just as guilty as their worst offender" rhetoric. 

Where does that come from? I don't understand it, I would not blame someone for their affiliation beyond what they've done in it's name and the room to question their ideology. I for instance do not blame you for everything that Right Wing Fascism has done, that'd be insane, you had nothing to do with it beyond carrying a similar banner.