Sociopath Community

Whorechata said: 

Kestrel said: 

Whorechata said: 

Isn't white superiority partly about black lives being inferior or subhuman? 

 White nationalism isn't the same as white supremacy. It's often a blurred line. However, I am a firm supporter that Whites should be allowed to celebrate being the lead innovators of most of history. You can do that within good graces without being racist.

 

 White nationalism may not be the same as white supremacy but when you tote about a symbol that was used in the Nazi party one would think that there is a belief that the person displaying that would have which is that there are always those inferior to them, or subhuman and this would give and encourage racist views. 

 

 It's no different than being apart of the conservative or democratic party but not endorsing all their ideals.

QuietBeef said: 

Kestrel said: 

Whorechata said: 

Isn't white superiority partly about black lives being inferior or subhuman? 

 White nationalism isn't the same as white supremacy. It's often a blurred line. However, I am a firm supporter that Whites should be allowed to celebrate being the lead innovators of most of history. You can do that within good graces without being racist.

 

 Can you? Because I think Asians might have something to say about whites being the "lead innovators of most of history". And Arabs. And pre-plague Central and South Americans.

 It's nothing on the achievements of whites and their place behind them in the progress race of history is a constant one.

Whorechata said: 

Kestrel said: 

Whorechata said: 

Isn't white superiority partly about black lives being inferior or subhuman? 

 White nationalism isn't the same as white supremacy. It's often a blurred line. However, I am a firm supporter that Whites should be allowed to celebrate being the lead innovators of most of history. You can do that within good graces without being racist.

 

 White nationalism may not be the same as white supremacy but when you tote about a symbol that was used in the Nazi party one would think that there is a belief that the person displaying that would have which is that there are always those inferior to them, or subhuman and this would give and encourage racist views. 

They're not too far apart when it comes to descending down the racial staircase. 

It sounds like a technicality, but it is technically a distinction. While both have an essence of pride in their own stances and note the divisions between races, only one of them has gone far enough to allow themselves to actually start ranking them. 

I'm sure if he were challenged to present the merits of other cultures that it'd not be that difficult, right? 

Kestrel said: 

QuietBeef said: 

 What do you consider "family values"?

I have to elaborate more to paint the full picture. I believe our government and society is mainly dictated by the flow of corporate wealth and lobbying. The country is not for the people, the country is not for national values, it is for profit and has been so for a long time. The corporate shadow aristocracy we have today is the inevitable fate of every democracy. We need to break from this system that exploits us and only keeps a facade of these rights to keep us placated.

'For Profit' is our Nationalist Values.

QuietBeef said: 

Kestrel said: 

QuietBeef said: 

 What do you consider "family values"?

 I have to elaborate more to paint the full picture. I believe our government and society is mainly dictated by the flow of corporate wealth and lobbying. The country is not for the people, the country is not for national values, it is for profit and has been so for a long time. The corporate shadow aristocracy we have today is the inevitable fate of every democracy. We need to break from this system that exploits us and only keeps a facade of these rights to keep us placated.

 So family values is your term for a society less influenced by corporate interests? I don't quite understand.

 I was implying we need a system that adheres more by traditional family values and national. Which include integrity and a higher value on the traditional family structure instead of monetary values.

Kestrel said: 

QuietBeef said: 

Kestrel said: 

Whorechata said: 

Isn't white superiority partly about black lives being inferior or subhuman? 

 White nationalism isn't the same as white supremacy. It's often a blurred line. However, I am a firm supporter that Whites should be allowed to celebrate being the lead innovators of most of history. You can do that within good graces without being racist.

 

 Can you? Because I think Asians might have something to say about whites being the "lead innovators of most of history". And Arabs. And pre-plague Central and South Americans.

 It's nothing on the achievements of whites and their place behind them in the progress race of history is a constant one.

 Wow. You should read up on history. I recommend starting with China.

Kestrel said: 

QuietBeef said: 

Kestrel said: 

QuietBeef said: 

 What do you consider "family values"?

 I have to elaborate more to paint the full picture. I believe our government and society is mainly dictated by the flow of corporate wealth and lobbying. The country is not for the people, the country is not for national values, it is for profit and has been so for a long time. The corporate shadow aristocracy we have today is the inevitable fate of every democracy. We need to break from this system that exploits us and only keeps a facade of these rights to keep us placated.

 So family values is your term for a society less influenced by corporate interests? I don't quite understand.

 I was implying we need a system that adheres more by traditional family values and national. Which include integrity and a higher value on the traditional family structure instead of monetary values.

 But what is "traditional family structure" to you?

QuietBeef said: 

Kestrel said: 

QuietBeef said: 

Kestrel said: 

Whorechata said: 

Isn't white superiority partly about black lives being inferior or subhuman? 

 White nationalism isn't the same as white supremacy. It's often a blurred line. However, I am a firm supporter that Whites should be allowed to celebrate being the lead innovators of most of history. You can do that within good graces without being racist.

 

 Can you? Because I think Asians might have something to say about whites being the "lead innovators of most of history". And Arabs. And pre-plague Central and South Americans.

 It's nothing on the achievements of whites and their place behind them in the progress race of history is a constant one.

 Wow. You should read up on history. I recommend starting with China.

 China while they discovered gun powder never utilized it's potential and instead sold it to focus on porcelain. They had their advances but it's a dim comparison to the innovation of whites over the course of history.

QuietBeef said: 

Kestrel said: 

QuietBeef said: 

Kestrel said: 

QuietBeef said: 

 What do you consider "family values"?

 I have to elaborate more to paint the full picture. I believe our government and society is mainly dictated by the flow of corporate wealth and lobbying. The country is not for the people, the country is not for national values, it is for profit and has been so for a long time. The corporate shadow aristocracy we have today is the inevitable fate of every democracy. We need to break from this system that exploits us and only keeps a facade of these rights to keep us placated.

 So family values is your term for a society less influenced by corporate interests? I don't quite understand.

 I was implying we need a system that adheres more by traditional family values and national. Which include integrity and a higher value on the traditional family structure instead of monetary values.

 But what is "traditional family structure" to you?

 Nuclear family. What else?