I think we should inhabit mars first with monkeys and see how that goes
I recently ran into a person touting income equality for all.
So I asked him what exactly does this mean?
Basically he said that the top 1% are getting richer while the rest of the people are getting poorer. The income gap is getting larger.
I asked him why this is a problem and he had nothing to say.
I saw this Fox News segment where they asked some Bernie voter why they voted for him and they said something about income inequality, then the Fox news reporter pressed them and the voter was unable to rationalise her position and it became clear that she didn't really know much about anything. In that same Fox reports all Bernie supporters were painted to be exactly like that lowest common denominator.
Maybe stop arguing with idiots that will reinforce your preconceived bias if you can't even handle that.
So I ask you. Why is it a problem that the top 1% or 0.1% get richer while everybody else just gets a little bit richer?
That's a dishonest question, there wouldn't be an issue if everyone just got a little bit richer along with the top 1%.
Seems this has been used as a tool to push socialism. Somehow its unfair that the rich get richer? They dont deserve to get richer?
Seems the top 0.1% kinda got it figured out, while the rest maybe just dont care, are happy where they are, or a just are not smart enough to figure things out.
I mean, money is not everything right. As long as you are happy.
Capitalism rewards those that work harder smarter.
10% of the people have an IQ less the 83.
What do we do with people that dont or cant work harder and smarter? Do they deserve the same income as a Lawyer?
Income inequality by definition is less about the specific people becoming rich, it's a societal problem. It's also not a stable thing, income inequality has skyrocketed over the past decades and puts an increasingly larger strain on an increasingly larger amount of people. If you don't care about the greater implications for society, then fair enough I guess. But I'd like as many people as possible to do as well as possible. Do you really not see the issue with 1% of Americans projected to receive a quarter of the national income in a decade or two?
I think we should inhabit mars first with monkeys and see how that goes
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
i just have 750 a month and live on it and rent a room i live in with my husband and im ok
I guess the way you live is somewhat similar to Socialism.
It makes you and BR's right wing comments hit a little ironically though.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
6/20/2020 8:22:05 PM
would it not be good for the USA to take a minuscule slice off the top and give double the wealth of every other american? i dont see problems there.
Are you Robin Hood? Capitalism is good at pointing out who wins. I think this is a little about envy and human nature.
"Those rich people don't deserve to be rich, How dare they" Lets take from them that don't deserve and give to those that do. kinda pathetic huh?
yea that was pathetic white knight logic butchering of an honest question. theft lol what. they already give and take in both directions. doing away with that would result in abusive corporate practice like never before seen. why not do it in a way that benefits the country more instead of only a small handful of people? i am sure your boyfriend jeff will forgive you. anyways "anyone who thinks taxing any ultra wealthy entity 1 or 2 extra percents is just a jealous and unenlightened thief." remember when you said that? remember when i asked about human nature and capitalism? wow me neither maybe you should think less xd
i asked why not directly benefit every other person in the country? ever given a dollar to someone with nothing? it means nothing to you yet you did lots for them. theres zero sentiment against rich people in that idea lol. when half the country has nothing it just makes more sense to give them a dollar. this improves well being for half the american population while amazon don't even employ 1 million of them. so why not? direct benefit half the entire country versus you milking on jeff bezos cock and say the peasants should be grateful collecting the slobber that trickles down? lol its ok man im sure jeff will see this and reward you with amazon participation trophy even deeper inside your ass than at the moment =)
this doesn't solve penis envy, it just helps a lot of people. you brought that up i wonder why. i am not robin hood and you will not be in the top you are just a bootlicker faggot
last edit on
6/20/2020 11:37:33 PM
would it not be good for the USA to take a minuscule slice off the top and give double the wealth of every other american? i dont see problems there.
Are you Robin Hood? Capitalism is good at pointing out who wins. I think this is a little about envy and human nature.
"Those rich people don't deserve to be rich, How dare they" Lets take from them that don't deserve and give to those that do. kinda pathetic huh?
yea that was pathetic white knight logic butchering of an honest question. theft lol what. they already give and take in both directions. doing away with that would result in abusive corporate practice like never before seen. why not do it in a way that benefits the country more instead of only a small handful of people?
I'm not saying to do away with existing taxes. The government has incentivized growth over tax and give policies. The growth is due to the reinvestment of capital. This provides jobs.
Tax and give policies enable entitlement, which i despise.
What exactly are you proposing here? What would you do to benefit the country more than providing jobs? Although I do agree with you, the Amazon jobs do suck.
i am sure your boyfriend jeff will forgive you. anyways "anyone who thinks taxing any ultra wealthy entity 1 or 2 extra percents is just a jealous and unenlightened thief." remember when you said that? remember when i asked about human nature and capitalism? wow me neither maybe you should think less xd
lol, he's kinda ugly and not my type. so you are saying to tax an extra 2% and do what with the money?
i asked why not directly benefit every other person in the country? ever given a dollar to someone with nothing? it means nothing to you yet you did lots for them.
So you do want to tax the rich and give to the poor? no, i have never given a dollar to anyone. i have offered jobs for money and offered to spend the time to double back and buy food, but usually i get no takers on that. so i figure the beggars just want to buy booze or drugs
when you give money to people it degrades them and causes entitlement
theres zero sentiment against rich people in that idea lol. when half the country has nothing it just makes more sense to give them a dollar.
there you are with this giving again. i mean thats great. sounds like you care but im thinking you are doing more harm than good.
this improves well being for half the american population while amazon don't even employ 1 million of them. so why not?
they did not earn it, thats why. they will become entitled and think they actually deserve what they are getting.
Now taking some of that 2% money and enabling job creation, training, education. encouraging entrepreneurial activities. That would value society much more. Basically helping the lower 99% up, instead of lowering the 1% down. thats a win win.
direct benefit half the entire country versus you milking on jeff bezos cock and say the peasants should be grateful collecting the slobber that trickles down? lol its ok man im sure jeff will see this and reward you with amazon participation trophy even deeper inside your ass than at the moment =)
this doesn't solve penis envy, it just helps a lot of people. you brought that up i wonder why. i am not robin hood and you will not be in the top you are just a bootlicker faggot
lol, the 12 yo girl got a potty mouth. actually i like how you waited to the end to get all triggered.
i think the peasants should get smarter work hard and join in on the prosperity and not try to get something for nothing.