A corporation can make their logo black, but when I make my face black it's called racism.
Does that seem right to you?
A corporation can make their logo black, but when I make my face black it's called racism.
Does that seem right to you?
When a company does it it's sympathetic, when a person does it it's cultural appropriation.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
A corporation can make their logo black, but when I make my face black it's called racism.
Does that seem right to you?
When a company does it it's sympathetic, when a person does it it's cultural appropriation.
Does that seem right to you?
Both cases are all about appearances anyway.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Both cases are all about appearances anyway.
Yes but which one's appropriating who?
Does that seem right to you?
Not sure you're even allowed to quote a black person tbh.
last edit on
6/5/2020 6:16:24 PM
Both cases are all about appearances anyway.
Yes but which one's appropriating who?
Disenfranchised minorities, like the Native American who sheds a manly tear as Berkshire walks through the town in an Indian Headdress.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Does that seem right to you?
Not sure you're even allowed to quote a black person tbh.
You can quote them in a white dialect, you just can't quote them in racial ebonics.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Both cases are all about appearances anyway.
Yes but which one's appropriating who?
Disenfranchised minorities, like the Native American who sheds a manly tear as Berkshire walks through the town in an Indian Headdress.
Ay foo, that ain't right, u feel me.