Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 22 posts
Posts: 511
0 votes RE: genetic data does not p...

what? this pisses me off, i lost my job to this shit and my grandma was sick

it should piss everybody off. these scientist are trying everything to lead people away from the lab creation explanation. what do you think would happen if everyone knew this pandemic was funded by the China, US, and France (and other countries) and created in a lab just because they could. BTW this research was under the guise of vaccine production. well guess what, no fucking vaccine

This gain of function research is dangerous and should be stopped. The arrogance to think we can contain nature. Just look at the history of accidental lab related virus releases.

The scientific evidence points to a lab created virus, not a natural one. One of the biggest points supporting lab creation is natural selection.

If you look at SARS-1 2003, you see a virus jump from animals to humans. You see an animal virus significantly mutating to adapt itself to human cells. You can see this in the genetics. The natural selection is obvious. SARS-2 2019 is not like this. It came out in 2019 already best fit for humans. Why is this? because in the lab, the scientist use human cells to force mutations at an accelerated rate. cool huh?

and then the scientists pat each other on the back by writing papers and giving talks.

 

Posts: 331
0 votes RE: genetic data does not p...

The avatar really suits you.... There's no consensus that the virus came from a lab. The nice thing with google is that you can find research to support whatever conclusion you want to draw, as long as you operate under confirmation bias.

Every research that doesn't support your conclusions is a conspiracy.

Posts: 511
0 votes RE: genetic data does not p...

The avatar really suits you.... There's no consensus that the virus came from a lab. The nice thing with google is that you can find research to support whatever conclusion you want to draw, as long as you operate under confirmation bias.

Every research that doesn't support your conclusions is a conspiracy.

Your avatar does not suit you.

 

There is no science for the consensus. Only conjecture and speculation from the "experts ".

The "experts" have a conflicts of interest they are not stating in their vague science-less papers.

The conflict of interest is that, if this virus is from a lab, which I think it is, the "experts" are out of work. Gain of function research will stop.

 

I would like to see some science disputing the facts about the virus.

Do you have any science to add for an argument against the lab position? I would like to see it.

There is building compelling evidence for lab created virus that is being ignored.

A third party neutral to the effect of the outcome needs to be looking into this.

A small group of scientist are using science to find the truth.

 

The media is biased for other reasons and google has nothing to do with this.

 

 

Posts: 511
0 votes RE: genetic data does not p...

 

This is a very powerful argrument for the lab origin. Australian's have been working on this.

Posts: 511
0 votes RE: genetic data does not p...

Finally, scientist come out from the bullshit financially biased consensus. the probability of this SARS-CoV-2 virus coming from nature is about ZERO.

The lab leak consensus is growing.

 

 

good fucking job. these scientist are fighting against a mob of corrupt scientist that do not want their funding sources to dry up. The TRUTH must be told!

 

 

Posts: 511
0 votes RE: genetic data does not p...

A couple of updates

 

more evidence has come out that the RDB is very well adapted to human ACE2 receptors. They did a good job at training this thing to infect humans. more lab creation evidence.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.17.157982v1

 

Also there has been a mutation in the RBD that appears to have increased the infectivity and possibly cause already infected individuals to be able to be infected again. No immunity in some.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.20.161323v1

sucks for a vaccine development if its true. kinda like the flu vaccine, does not quite work.

 

Some other news, it may be that many more people got infected with this virus than first thought. The Ro may be in the order of 6 or so, which is crazy high.

 

Remember this virus attacks the heart, lungs, kidneys, nerves, blood vessels, prostate, testis, brain, placenta, liver, intestines, list goes on and on. you dont want this virus. the long term effect of this man made virus are unknown 

 

 

Posts: 1319
1 votes RE: genetic data does not p...
Sven said: 

what? this pisses me off, i lost my job to this shit and my grandma was sick

it should piss everybody off. these scientist are trying everything to lead people away from the lab creation explanation. what do you think would happen if everyone knew this pandemic was funded by the China, US, and France (and other countries) and created in a lab just because they could. BTW this research was under the guise of vaccine production. well guess what, no fucking vaccine

This gain of function research is dangerous and should be stopped. The arrogance to think we can contain nature. Just look at the history of accidental lab related virus releases.

The scientific evidence points to a lab created virus, not a natural one. One of the biggest points supporting lab creation is natural selection.

If you look at SARS-1 2003, you see a virus jump from animals to humans. You see an animal virus significantly mutating to adapt itself to human cells. You can see this in the genetics. The natural selection is obvious. SARS-2 2019 is not like this. It came out in 2019 already best fit for humans. Why is this? because in the lab, the scientist use human cells to force mutations at an accelerated rate. cool huh?

and then the scientists pat each other on the back by writing papers and giving talks.

 

I really appreciate Trump for pointing out who is to blame when it comes to this, he straight up called the guilty party out. There are alot of clowns on this site who hate him because the people around them hate him and they said hes a bad fascist mysogine on reddit and tumblr but UN betrayed the world and alot of world leaders also were too passive about it.

Posts: 511
0 votes RE: genetic data does not p...
Sven said: 

what? this pisses me off, i lost my job to this shit and my grandma was sick

it should piss everybody off. these scientist are trying everything to lead people away from the lab creation explanation. what do you think would happen if everyone knew this pandemic was funded by the China, US, and France (and other countries) and created in a lab just because they could. BTW this research was under the guise of vaccine production. well guess what, no fucking vaccine

This gain of function research is dangerous and should be stopped. The arrogance to think we can contain nature. Just look at the history of accidental lab related virus releases.

The scientific evidence points to a lab created virus, not a natural one. One of the biggest points supporting lab creation is natural selection.

If you look at SARS-1 2003, you see a virus jump from animals to humans. You see an animal virus significantly mutating to adapt itself to human cells. You can see this in the genetics. The natural selection is obvious. SARS-2 2019 is not like this. It came out in 2019 already best fit for humans. Why is this? because in the lab, the scientist use human cells to force mutations at an accelerated rate. cool huh?

and then the scientists pat each other on the back by writing papers and giving talks.

 

I really appreciate Trump for pointing out who is to blame when it comes to this, he straight up called the guilty party out. There are alot of clowns on this site who hate him because the people around them hate him and they said hes a bad fascist mysogine on reddit and tumblr but UN betrayed the world and alot of world leaders also were too passive about it.

Posts: 511
0 votes RE: genetic data does not p...

More virologist wake the fuck up and figure out this virus is a lab created chimeric virus accident OR released on purpose to create the fall of the CCP.

https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/the-case-is-building-that-covid-19-had-a-lab-origin/

By Jonathan Latham, PhD and Allison Wilson, PhD

The Case Is Building That COVID-19 Had a Lab Origin

 

Posted Image

 

 

China has gathered over 2000 wild viruses from bats, pangolins and other animals.

Gain of function research  is routinely done making these viruses more transmittable and more deadly

Chimeric viruses are assembled from the best known sources like a frankenstein monsters.

A bat coronavirus backbone, a pangolin spike protein and insert a furin cleavage site for good luck. after this you have the making of a SARS-COV-2 killing pandemic.

 

"a lab escape is by far the leading hypothesis to explain the origins of Sars-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic."

fuck your sheeple financially biased consensus, fucking pathetic

 

 

Posts: 2510
0 votes RE: genetic data does not point to wet market transmission of the v...

The avatar really suits you.... There's no consensus that the virus came from a lab. The nice thing with google is that you can find research to support whatever conclusion you want to draw, as long as you operate under confirmation bias.

Every research that doesn't support your conclusions is a conspiracy.

 This guy is a fucking moron. This is what is wrong with science today. I mean, who does science by consensus? The earth was flat once by consensus. Sven was a genius. RIP.

FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! FEAR!
10 / 22 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.