Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 50 posts
Posts: 32800
0 votes RE: The end of SC?

 I  tend to divide it by seasons, usually only looking at it in smaller allotments of time only when prompted over it.

To attempt to measure it we'd need something a bit more concrete though. The seasonal effect is important to take into account but we'd able to see it by comparing past years' activity at the same month and day.

I'd figure that defining the mean of this site's activity would be how to find a bar, and even then I'd still insist on splitting it down to the seasons instead of just a single average. 

Down to the day's how to get the data completely accurate, but is it worth that amount of effort when what it'd return wouldn't be too different from a larger span of time? I don't need to know how often Legga signs in every 14th of March to see website activity, and even that would be ignoring if something was different about one year's March 14th over another's. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 507
0 votes RE: The end of SC?

It strikes me as better to find the mean for each month individually. While we don't need to know day-by-day activity we still need a tangible and clearly defined way to measure this activity per month. Do you have a suggestion? Mine would probably be something like the amount of unique posters with more than ~10 posts in that month.

Posts: 32800
0 votes RE: The end of SC?

It strikes me as better to find the mean for each month individually. While we don't need to know day-by-day activity we still need a tangible and clearly defined way to measure this activity per month.

Yeah, splitting it down to twelve wouldn't be terrible, and for seasonal averages we'd just need to convert it from base 12 to base 4. 

Do you have a suggestion? Mine would probably be something like the amount of unique posters with more than ~10 posts in that month.

I'd need to think on it. 

From my own older calculations for users' posts per day, I'd found challenges once it got to people with tons of puppets. Turquie for example is one unique user who offers tons of activity to the website, but she's done it under the... "guise" of tons of different names. 

We all still recognized it as her, but it puts strain on the data collection side of things. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 5/17/2020 3:33:50 PM
Posts: 511
0 votes RE: The end of SC?

luna had passion and fire. the new owner is as lethargic and boring as a cucumber 

 

she did/does have passion and fire, it was her narcissism ad personal involvement that was her downfall. spending her own money for a bunch of sociopaths, hahahahahahahaha. im so happy she woke up and is doing better. good job luna.

the new owner has taken advise and is staying out of the drama, not getting personally involved with butthurt narcs and sociopaths is a good idea. the site has a better chance of survival this way. although i have no idea why someone would spend their own money to maintain a site like this. must be ego or out of spite for luna. this will soon fade

 

Posts: 817
0 votes RE: The end of SC?
Fake Blanc said: 

How many "Ends" has it been now? 

Not talking about a definitive end, but a slow death that it can be felt as we get fewer and fewer users, and a big part of old users left. This place used to be a Warzone.

I seriously need to start charging people a dollar every time I have to hear this nonsense, I'd have a rather solid trust fund by now. 

This place has downtime, just be patient or make a fool out of yourself to lure them back. 

 Sometimes I wonder why not create something original, or at least half original, with a new brand name or w/er. It's like you depend solemnly on what '' Has Been '' of SC and not what it's in fact nowadays: a former shadow of what it used to be.

Move on. This place will always belong to Luna, you are just pushing it for her. Like it was said before, a big slice of the users that made SC, SC, already left. 

This place can have a future of its own, but being a copycat won't make it work as it's already not.

Posts: 32800
0 votes RE: The end of SC?
Fake Blanc said: 

How many "Ends" has it been now? 

Not talking about a definitive end, but a slow death that it can be felt as we get fewer and fewer users, and a big part of old users left. This place used to be a Warzone.

I seriously need to start charging people a dollar every time I have to hear this nonsense, I'd have a rather solid trust fund by now. 

This place has downtime, just be patient or make a fool out of yourself to lure them back. 

Sometimes I wonder why not create something original, or at least half original, with a new brand name or w/er. It's like you depend solemnly on what '' Has Been '' of SC and not what it's in fact nowadays: a former shadow of what it used to be.

Culture is built on the back of it's own history. 

Without history there's nothing, no weight, no substance, just a reddit. 

Move on. This place will always belong to Luna, you are just pushing it for her. Like it was said before, a big slice of the users that made SC, SC, already left. 

This place can have a future of its own, but being a copycat won't make it work as it's already not.

What would you build in it's place? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 19
0 votes RE: The end of SC?

luna got her traffic by stealing it from a popular blog and then leveraging search engine optimization.

she also created drama on many other forums raising attention for her forum

if we rebrand, someone will need to cover marketing

Posts: 1111
0 votes RE: The end of SC?

Luna didn't steal traffic from the blog. The forum was connected to the blog. Luna rebuilt the forum but then Ed complained to ME about someone being banned (I think) and SC was cut-off from the blog lol. But that would've happened anyhow. 

SC attracted some interesting people. If you found SC on your own you were meant to. Jesus had plans for you. The users that stuck around had a combination of traits maybe because of the subject matter idk

I Took The Liberty Of Fertilizing Your Caviar.
Posts: 32800
0 votes RE: The end of SC?

Luna didn't steal traffic from the blog. The forum was connected to the blog. Luna rebuilt the forum but then Ed complained to ME about someone being banned (I think) and SC was cut-off from the blog lol. But that would've happened anyhow. 

It wasn't Edvard, it was Piles. 

In some ways though it would have made more sense if it was Alter, she actually used M.E.'s blog. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 5/18/2020 6:36:40 PM
Posts: 184
2 votes RE: The end of SC?

the chick above is so smart and educated, someone upvote her post before she od again xddd

10 / 50 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.