Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 331
-1 votes RE: Intelligent Design

Major, your giving off the vibe that your beliefs are very fragile and you don't know enough to argue for them so you are panicking in the face of logic that doesn't align with them completely.

Do I? It wasn't my intention to give off that vibe. I meant to give a different one. I'm lacking in many ways as a person... I'm sorry for wanting to dick your girl, I know I'm not worthy. But for all my faults, I'm still a man of reason.

I laugh in the face of logic, not panic in front of it. I don't know why you'd insinuate otherwise.

Posts: 2815
1 votes RE: Intelligent Design
I laugh in the face of logic

 Clearly.

Sc is pretty boring.
Posts: 331
0 votes RE: Intelligent Design
PalePeach said:
You are getting very emotional and making arguments based on assumptions that weren't even in her point.
That's where you're wrong, my young lesbian lady. The simulation argument relies on a subtle assumption that we can modify reality. That doesn't apply to intelligent design as she defined it.
Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: Intelligent Design
Xena said: 
 Add to that the fact that there have been at least 3 major extinction events where life miraculously returned

 There have been 5 know major extinction events, and several minor ones. We are currently in the Sixth, known to be caused by human activity. Life didn't "return" persay because it never completely left. Some forms of life have survived each extinction: Crocodiles are known as the only large reptile to survive the  Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event and Sharks have survived the last 4 consecutively. Both are good examples of species who's ancestors remained because they survived in a niche that was simply unimpacted by the cause of the great extinction.

The Ordovician–Silurian extinction events saw the end of 70% of species
The Permian–Triassic extinction event, the largest of all time saw the end of 90-96% of all species on earth,
There has never been a point when all life on earth was killed then life spontaneously started again.

Humans, Cats, Bears, all mammals; are descendants of tiny mouse like creatures that were small enough to survive the extinction of the dinosaurs.

With much of life on earth gone, the few who survive multiply quickly with little competition until they run into each other.

 lol little one, what is your damage?

This is the third time I've caught you trying harder than hard to turn my musings about some happening I'm not particularly attached to into smthg to fight about. You've hilariously misquoted me again.

And no, we're not in the middle of an extinction event rn. We might possibly be looking at the beginning of one. But we're still breeding like flies on shit. 100 000 deaths due to COVID 19 is a walk in the park.

As for the other species we've been killing off... maybe. That depends on how you define "extinction event."

 

What's the point you're arguing, anyway? There's no need to go bottom up with it bc I've considered myself an agnostic for most of my life. An argument about whose imaginary friends are better is one of the dumbest reasons I can think of to have a war, commit genocide, or even waste an afternoon squabbling on a forum.

Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: Intelligent Design

Are you saying that you believe there's no way aliens could have intentionally stirred the pot to aid our evolution, and you believe that it was all an accident?

Posts: 2647
-1 votes RE: Intelligent Design

Now why don't you go out and breathe some fresh air and let me talk with the hot brainiac. 

You'll have to Chad harder than this if you want to impress her, or you'll have to be able to afford her price. 

 Peach is a sex worker?

Posts: 2647
-1 votes RE: Intelligent Design
Xena said: 

That's the most compelling argument I've heard so far for the existence of a Divine Being.

However, it still does jack shit to explain why I should subscribe to some form of patriarchal monotheism.

 

 

Xena said: 

That's the most compelling argument I've heard so far for the existence of a Divine Being.

The being doesn't have to be divine, it could just be a civilization that has reached technological maturity. 

 

 

 

Xena said: 
Xena said: 

 

 

 Yes. I'm rather fond of the "Children of Space Dust and Time" hypothesis. 

It holds that around 2/3 of the way through our planet's 14 to 15(?) billion year history, a meteor carrying DNA from some other part of the galaxy smashed into her, and impregnated the primordial ooze with what would evolve over the next 5billion years or so into every type of life we know, and many that we don't.

However, when scientists recreated the chemical reaction that would have eventually become living phytoplankton and such, they determined that the odds that the 'accident' of life was truly an accident were infinitesimal. Add to that the fact that there have been at least 3 major extinction events where life miraculously returned, and my skepticism doesn't know which way to turn.

 

THEN AGAIN, A WHOLE LOT CAN HAPPEN IN THE UNFATHOMABLE NUMBER OF AEONS  THAT ADD UP TO 5 BILLION YEARS.

Hint:  ^^ That's the key phrase .

 Don'tcha hate it when ppl start arguing after you've already stated a point that demonstrates your agreement with them? lol

 

 

 

Xena said: 

Or if you prefer...

 

 

;D

 

^^ There's the full discussion that whatserface cherrypicked with the apparent goal(?)  of tryinta be combative.

Just in case anybody missed it  :D

last edit on 4/11/2020 6:13:50 PM
Posts: 331
0 votes RE: Intelligent Design
Xena said: 

Major I love you so much, mwah mwah mwah

Thank you, my Italian sweetheart.

As for your question, I don't believe that aliens have created us.

Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: Intelligent Design
Xena said: 

Major I love you so much, mwah mwah mwah

Thank you, my Italian sweetheart.

As for your question, I don't believe that aliens have created us.

 :D

That question was for Peach, but that's ok. I always enjoy chatting with you  :)

You've also confirmed that cupcake is just a shitstirrer lol

 

Her response to me would indicate that she perceives me as wrong or inferior or w/e based on her attempt to twist my statements into a strong belief that aliens created us. Which she seems to be hotly disputing with a slightly slanted, tho mostly correct interpretation of the fossil record.

Her response to you contradicts that. If you're also saying that there's no way aliens created us, and she's blasting you for being so attached to your beliefs, then she shouldn't knock me for stating (what she believes after a fuckton of editing to be) the opposite opinion  :D :D

last edit on 4/11/2020 6:49:33 PM
Posts: 331
0 votes RE: Intelligent Design
Xena said: 

 :D

That question was for Peach, but that's ok. I always enjoy chatting with you  :)

You've also confirmed that cupcake is just a shitstirrer lol

 

Her response to me would indicate that she perceives me as wrong or inferior or w/e based on her attempt to twist my statements into a strong belief that aliens created us. Which she seems to be hotly disputing with a slightly slanted, tho mostly correct interpretation of the fossil record.

Her response to you contradicts that. If you're also saying that there's no way aliens created us, and she's blasting you for being so attached to your beliefs, then she shouldn't knock me for stating (what she believes after a fuckton of editing to be) the opposite opinion  :D :D

Oh good catch. What a hypocrite.

last edit on 4/11/2020 7:13:29 PM
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.