Lol
Systematic stated: source post
BT: 2, 7, 42, --> 44 <--
Really, asshole? :P Even if this was a poke at asexualism, it would logically be "no condom" and then that there's no prior "use" to "reuse".
Systematic stated: source post
BT: 2, 7, 42, --> 44 <--
Really, asshole? :P Even if this was a poke at asexualism, it would logically be "no condom" and then that there's no prior "use" to "reuse".