Last summer psychopathic woman kills husband. This summer uses teenage boys as sex toys with the threat if they don't agree she will see to that they are kicked out of the country. They still rat her out and are lately brutally beaten. This fall, her mother and father are attacked, the man dies and the woman survives. She (the daughter) and her less than half her age BF flees the country but are caught in Norway.
Sorry about crappy machine translates:
When Eskilstuna Kurirens reporters confronts her with her face is clearly visible and that the person she names have tattoos that are not visible on the film - she argues that this woman has used the cover cream to not her tattoos visible. A moment later in the conversation, she says that the woman in the film made use of bleaching cream to remove the tattoos which does not comply with newly shot images on her unnamed woman.
When I read different forums where this is discussed, I notice a trend. Many people indeed call her a psychopath. But it is like they all have the same misconception. They go like "She seems psychopathic because she committed several weird crimes, but what is not psychopathic is that she is sloppy, and did not plan ahead". Isn't it that true with true psychopathy, that you actually lack good planning skills?